Climate policy impacts on the competitiveness of energy-intensive manufacturing sectors

Energy Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 3052-3060

  Bassi, Andrea M ^a,b   Yudken, Joel S ^c   Ruth, Matthias ^d  

^a Millennium Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c High Road Strategies LLC ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Energy policy; Industry model

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE POLICY; COST-INCREASES; ENERGY INTENSITY; ENERGY INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES; ENERGY PRICES; ENERGY SOURCE; HEAT AND POWER; INDUSTRIAL USERS; INDUSTRY SECTORS; INTERNATIONAL MARKETS; MANUFACTURING SECTOR; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; PRICING POLICY; PRODUCTION ACTIVITY; US ECONOMY;

ALUMINA; COSTS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY POLICY; FOSSIL FUELS; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS; INDUSTRY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

COMPETITION;

CARBON; COMPETITIVENESS; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOSSIL FUEL; MANUFACTURING; PRICING POLICY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67349178623     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.055     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Canes, M., 2007. Why Cap & Trade is the Wrong Policy to Curb Greenhouse Gases for the United States. George C. Marshall Institute.
2. Davidsdottir B., and Ruth M. Pulp non-fiction: dynamic modeling of industrial systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 3 (2005) 191-211
3. Ellerman, et al. Emissions Trading in the US: Experience, Lessons, and Considerations for Greenhouse Gases (2003), Pew Center on Global Climate Change
4. Global Energy Services, 2005. The Impact of Energy and Environmental Policy Choices on US Manufacturing, US Economic Growth and Energy Markets. Prepared for National Association of Manufacturers, The Manufacturing Institute and the American Council for Capital Formation, Global Insight: Lexington, MA.
5. Hauser et al. 2008. Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design. World Resources Institute and Peterson Institute for International Economics.
6. McKinsey & Company and Ecofys, 2006. EU ETS Review, Report on International Competitiveness, European Commission, Directorate for Environment.
7. McKinsey Global Institute-MGI. Curbing Global Energy Demand Growth: The Energy Productivity Opportunity (2007), McKinsey&Company, San Francisco, CA
8. Morgenstern R.D., Aldy J.E., Herrnstadt E.M., Ho M., and Pizer W.A. Competitiveness Impacts on Carbon Dioxide Pricing Policies on Manufacturing (2007), Resources for the Future, Wasington
9. Morgenstern R.D., Ho M., Jhih-Shyang, and Zhang X. The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1825-1841
10. Nordhaus R., and Danish K. Designing a Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for the US (2003), Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA
11. Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.M., Jacoby, H.D., Gurgel, A.C., Metcalf, G.E., Sokolov, A.P., Holak, J.F., 2007. Assessment of US Cap-and-Trade Proposals. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 146.
12. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Pew Center on the States, 2007. Climate Change 101: Understanding and Responding to Global Climate Change.
13. Reinaud, J., 2005. Industrial Competitiveness Under the European Union Emissions Trade Scheme, IEA Information Paper, International Energy Agency.
14. Ruth M., Amato A., and Davidsdottir B. Impacts of market-based climate change policy on the US iron and steel industry. Energy Sources 22 3 (2000) 269-280
15. Ruth M., Amato A., and Davidsdottir B. Carbon emissions from US ethylene production under climate change policies. Environmental Science and Technology 36 2 (2002) 119-124
16. Ruth M., Davidsdottir B., and Amato A. Climate change policies and capital vintage effects: the cases of US pulp and paper, iron and steel and ethylene. Journal of Environmental Management 7 3 (2004) 221-233 June 2004
17. Ruth M., Davidsdottir B., and Laitner S. Impacts of energy and carbon taxes on the US pulp and paper industry. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 259-270
18. Scott, R.E., 1997. Accelerating Globalization? The Economic Effects of Climate Change Policies on US Workers. Economic Policy Institute, Washington DC.
19. Standard & Poor's DRI, 1998. The Impact of Meeting the Kyoto Protocol on Energy Markets and the Economy. Report prepared for UMWA-BCOA LMPCP Fund.
20. Sterman J.D. A skeptic's guide to computer models. In: Barney G.O., et al. (Ed). Managing a Nation: The Microcomputer Software Catalog (1988), Westview Press, Boulder, CO 209-229
21. Sterman J.D. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (2000), Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston
22. Sterman J.D., et al. Modeling the estimation of petroleum resources in the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 33 (1988) 219-249
23. US Census Bureau 2006a. Statistics for Industry Groups and Industries, 2006 (Annual Survey of Manufactures), M05(AS1) (Washington, DC: November 2006).
24. US Census Bureau 2006b. Statistics for Industry Groups and Industries, 2006 (Annual Survey of Manufactures). Washington, DC.
25. US Census Bureau, Statistics for Industry Groups and Industries, 2006c (Annual Survey of Manufactures), M05(AS1) (Washington, DC: November 2006).
26. US Congress, 2007a. America's Climate Security Act of 2007.
27. US Congress, 2007b. Low Carbon Economy Act of 2007: a bill to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the production and use of energy, and for other purposes.
28. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration-EIA, 2008a. Annual Energy Outlook 2008. DOE/EIA-0383(2008), Washington, DC.
29. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2008b. Energy Market and Economic Impacts of S. 2191, the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007, SR/OIAF/2008-01.
30. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2007. Energy Market and Economic Impacts of S. 1766, the Low Carbon Economy Act of 2007, SR/OIAF/2007-06.
31. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2002. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS).
32. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2006. Energy Market Impacts of Alternative Greenhouse Gas Intensity Reduction Goals, SR/OIAF/2006-01.
33. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2008c. Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO).
34. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration EIA, 2003. The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview 2003.
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2007. Energy Trends in Selected Manufacturing Sectors: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmentally Preferable Energy Outcomes, Final Report, Prepared by ICF International [EPA 100-R-07-003].
36. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2002. An Emerging Market for the Environment: A Guide to Emissions Trading.
37. World Resources Institute, 2008. Comparison of Legislative Climate Change Targets.