Component and mode models for the short-term scheduling of combined-cycle units

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 976-990

  Liu, Cong ^a   Shahidehpour, Mohammad ^a   Li, Zuyi ^a   Fotuhi Firuzabad, Mahmoud ^b  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Combined cycle gas turbine; Component model; Mixed integer programming; Mode model; Short term unit commitment; State transition diagram

Indexed keywords

COMBINED-CYCLE GAS TURBINE; COMPONENT MODEL; MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MODE MODEL; SHORT-TERM UNIT COMMITMENT; STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM;

COGENERATION PLANTS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; ENGINES; GAS TURBINES; MARINE ENGINES; OPERATING COSTS; PLASMA WAVES; SCHEDULING; STEAM TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY;

INTEGER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 67349170756     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016501     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B. Lu and M. Shahidehpour, "Short-term scheduling of combined-cycle units," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1616-1625, Aug. 2004.
2. T. Li and M. Shahidehpour, "Price-based unit commitment: A case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2015-2025, Nov. 2005.
3. M. Shahidehpour, H. Yamin, and Z. Li, Market Operations in Electric Power Systems.. New York: Wiley, 2002.
4. M. Boyce, Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants New York: ASME, 2002.
5. Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States - 2004., [Online]. Available: www.nrdc.org/air/pollution/benchmarking/2004/benchmark2004.pdf.
6. R. Kehlhofer, Combined-Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants. Lilburn, GA: Fairmont, 1991.
7. D. Chase, Combined-Cycle Development, Evolution, and Future. [Online]. Available: www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/tech_docs/en/downloads/ ger4206.pdf.
8. A. Wood and B. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation and Control 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1996.
9. A. Cohen and G. Ostrowski, "Scheduling units with multiple operating modes in unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 497-503, Feb. 1996.
10. M. Bjelogrlic, "Inclusion of combined cycle plants into optimal resource scheduling," in Proc. 2000 IEEE PES Summer Meeting, pp. 189-195.
11. D. Streiffert, R. Philbrick, and A. Ott, "A mixed integer programming solution for market clearing and reliability analysis," in Proc. IEEE PES General Meeting, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 2724-2731.
12. R. Bixby and E. Rothberg, "Progress in computational mixed integer programming - A look back from the other side of the tipping point," Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 149, pp. 7-41, 2007.
13. H. Williams, Model Building in Mathematical Programming., 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 1999.
14. P. Pourbeik, "Modeling of combined-cycle power plants for power system studies," in Proc. 2003 IEEE PES General Meeting, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1308-1313.
15. C. Jones and J. Jacobs, III, Economic and Technical Considerations for Combined-Cycle Performance-Enhancement Options. [Online]. Available: www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/tech_docs/en/downloads/ger4200.pdf.
16. F. Gao and G. Sheble, "Economic dispatch algorithms for thermal unit system involving combined cycle units," in Proc. 15th Power Systems Computation Conf., 2005, pp. 1-6, Session 21, Paper 5.
17. M. Carrion and J. Arroyo, "A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1371-1378, Aug. 2006.
18. Y. Fu and M. Shahidehpour, "Fast SCUC for large-scale power systems," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2144-2151, Nov. 2007.