Further evaluation of the effects of motivating operations on preference assessment outcomes

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 660-669

  Chappell, Nick ^a   Graff, Richard B ^a,b   Libby, Myrna E ^a,b   Ahearn, William H ^a,b  

^a NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Motivating operations; Preference assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTISM; CASE REPORT; CONDITIONING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REINFORCEMENT; SATIETY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 67349169057     PISSN: 17509467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Carr J.E., Nicolson A.C., and Higbee T.S. Evaluation of a brief multiple stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 33 (2000) 353-357
2. DeLeon I.G., and Iwata B.A. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 29 (1996) 519-532
3. Fisher W., Piazza C.C., Bowman L.G., Hagopian L.P., Owens J.C., and Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 25 (1992) 491-498
4. Gottschalk J.M., Libby M.E., and Graff R.B. The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 33 (2000) 85-88
5. Laraway S., Snycerski S., Michael J., and Poling A. Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36 (2003) 407-414
6. Lohrmann-O'Rourke S., and Browder D.M. Empirically based methods to assess the preference of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation 103 (1998) 146-161
7. McAdam D.B., Klatt K.P., Koffarnus M., Dicesare A., Solberg K., Welch S., et al. The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 38 (2005) 107-110
8. Michael J. Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 33 (2000) 401-410
9. Pace G.M., Ivancic M.T., Edwards G.L., Iwata B.A., and Page T.J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 18 (1985) 249-255
10. Rincover A., Newsom C.D., Lovaas O.I., and Koegel R.L. Some motivational properties of sensory reinforcement with psychotic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 24 (1977) 312-323
11. Roane S.H., Vollmer T.R., Ringdahl, and Marcus B.A. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 31 (1998) 605-620
12. Vollmer R.T., and Iwata B.A. Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24 (1991) 279-291