Differential regulation of SERK, LEC1-Like and Pathogenesis-Related genes during indirect secondary somatic embryogenesis in grapevine

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 743-752

  Maillot, Pascale ^a   Lebel, Sylvain ^a   Schellenbaum, Paul ^a   Jacques, Alban ^a   Walter, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE HAUTE ALSACE   (France)

Author keywords

Grapevine; L1L; Pathogenesis Related genes; SERK; Somatic embryogenesis

Indexed keywords

2,4 DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PATHOGENESIS RELATED PROTEINS, PLANT; PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEINS, PLANT; PHYTOHORMONE; PROTEIN KINASE; SERK PROTEIN, PLANT; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COTYLEDON; EMBRYO INDUCTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GRAPE; METABOLISM; PLANT GENE; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; COTYLEDON; EMBRYONIC INDUCTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN KINASES; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES; VITIS;

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 67349168736     PISSN: 09819428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Alemanno L., Devic M., Niemenak N., Sanier C., Guilleminot J., Rio M., Verdeil J.-L., and Montoro P. Characterization of leafy cotyledon1-like during embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L. Planta 227 (2008) 853-866
2. Beuning L., Bowen J.H., Persson H.A., Barraclough D., Bulley S., and MacRae E.A. Characterisation of Mal d 1-related genes in Malus. Plant Mol. Biol. 55 (2004) 369-388
3. Breiteneder H., Pettenburger K., Bito A., Valenta R., Kraft D., Rumpold H., Scheiner O., and Breitenbach M. The gene coding for the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v. 1, is highly homologous to a pea disease resistance response gene. EMBO J. 8 (1989) 1935-1938
4. Busam G., Kassemeyer H.H., and Matern U. Differential expression of chitinases in Vitis vinifera L. responding to systemic acquired resistance activators or fungal challenge. Plant Physiol. 115 (1997) 1029-1038
5. Castro A.J., Carapito C., Zorn N., Magné C., Leize E., Van Dorsselaer A., and Clément C. Proteomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues subjected to herbicide stress. J. Exp. Bot. 56 (2005) 2783-2795
6. Chong J., Le Henanff G., Bertsch C., and Walter B. Identification, expression analysis and characterization of defense signaling genes in Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46 (2008) 469-481
7. Chugh A., and Khurana P. Gene expression during somatic embryogenesis-recent advances. Curr. Sci. 83 (2002) 715-730
8. Colcombet J., Boisson-Dernier A., Ros-Palau R., Vera C.E., and Schroeder J.I. Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASES1 and 2 are essential for tapetum development and microscope maturation. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 3350-3361
9. Croce P., Vannini C., and Bracale M. An easy and convenient method for maintenance of embryogenic cultures of Vitis vinifera. Vitis 44 (2005) 197-198
10. Das D.K., Reddy M.K., Upadhyaya K.C., and Sopory S.K. An efficient leaf-disc culture method for the regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and transformation of grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Cell Rep. 20 (2002) 999-1005
11. De Jong A.J., Cordewener J., Lo Schiavo F., Terzi M., Vandekerckhove J., Van Kammen A., and De Vries S.C. A carrot somatic embryo mutant is rescued by chitinase. Plant Cell 4 (1992) 425-433
12. De Jong F., Mathesius U., Imin N., and Rolfe B.G. A proteome study of the proliferation of cultured Medicago truncatula protoplasts. Proteomics 7 (2007) 722-736
13. Deloire A., Kraeva E., Mauro M.C., Bonnet E., and Bierne J. Immunodetection of chitinase-like and β-1,3-glucanase-like proteins secreted in vitro by embryogenic and non-embryogenic cells of grapevines. Vitis 1 (1997) 51-52
14. Domoki M., Györgyey J., Biro J., Pasternak T.P., Zvara A., Bottka S., Puskas L.G., Dudits D., and Fehér A. Identification and characterization of genes associated with the induction of embryogenic competence in leaf-protoplast-derived alafalfa cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759 (2006) 543-551
15. Fambrini M., Durante C., Cionini G., Geri C., Giorgetti L., Michelotti V., Salvini M., and Pugliesi C. Characterization of LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE gene in Helianthus annuus and its relationship with zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. Dev. Genes Evol. 216 (2006) 253-264
16. Fehér A., Pasternak T.P., and Dudits D. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 74 (2003) 201-228
17. Fernandes H., Pasternak O., Bujacz G., Bujacz A., Sikorski M., and Jaskolski M. Lupinus luteus Pathogenesis-related protein as a reservoir for cytokinin. J. Mol. Biol. 378 (2008) 1040-1051
18. Finkler C., Giacomet C., Muschner V.C., Salzano F.M., and Freitas L.B. Molecular investigations of pathogenesis-related Betv1 homologues in Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Genetica 124 (2005) 117-125
19. Fung R.W.M., Gonzalo M., Fekete C., Kovacs L.G., He Y., Marsh E., McIntyre L.M., Schachtman D.P., and Qiu W. Powdery mildew induces defense-oriented reprogramming of the transcriptome in a susceptible but not in a resistant grapevine. Plant Physiol. 146 (2008) 236-249
20. Gaj M.D. Direct somatic embryogenesis as a rapid and efficient system for in vitro regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 64 (2001) 39-46
21. Gaj M.D. Factors influencing somatic embryogenesis induction and plant regeneration with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Growth Regul. 43 (2004) 27-47
22. Gaj M.D., Zhang S., Harada J.J., and Lemaux P.G. Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 222 (2005) 977-988
23. Gambino G., Ruffa P., Vallania R., and Gribaudo I. Somatic embryogenesis from whole flowers, anthers and ovaries of grapevine (Vitis spp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 90 (2007) 79-83
24. Hecht V., Vielle-Calzada J.P., Hartog M.V., Schmidt E.D.L., Boutilier K., Grossniklaus U., and de Vries S.C. The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol. 127 (2001) 803-816
25. Heese A., Hann D.R., Gimenez-Ibanez S., Jones A.M.E., He K., Li J., Schroeder J.I., Peck S.C., and Rathjen J.P. The receptor-like kinase SERK3/BAK1 is a central regulator of innate immunity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 12217-12222
26. Helleboid S., Bauw G., Belingheri L., Vasseur J., and Hilbert J.L. Extracellular β-1,3-glucanases are induced during early somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium. Planta 205 (1998) 56-63
27. Helleboid S., Hendricks T., Bauw G., Inzé D., Vasseur J., and Hilbert J.L. Three major somatic embryogenesis related proteins in Cichorium identified as PR proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 51 (2000) 1189-1200
28. Hoffmann-Sommergruber K., Vanek-Krebitz M., Radauer C., Wen J., Ferreira F., Scheiner O., and Breiteneder H. Genomic characterization of members of the Bet v 1 family: genes coding for allergens and pathogenesis-related proteins share introns positions. Gene 197 (1997) 91-100
29. Hu H., Xiong L., and Yang Y. Rice SERK1 gene positively regulates somatic embryogenesis of cultured cells and host defense response against fungal infection. Planta 222 (2005) 107-117
30. Imin N., Nizamidin M., Daniher D., Nolan K.E., Rose R.J., and Rolfe B.G. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Explant cultures grown under 6-benzylaminopurine and 1-naphtaleneacetic acid treatments. Plant Physiol. 137 (2005) 1250-1260
31. Jellouli N., Ben Jouira H., Skouri H., Ghorbel A., Gourgouri A., and Mliki A. Proteomic analysis of tunisian grapevine cultivar Razegui under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 165 (2008) 471-481
32. Kasprzewska A. Plant chitinases-regulation and function. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 8 (2003) 809-824
33. Koistinen K.M., Soininen P., Venäläinen T.A., Häyrinen J., Laatikainen R., Peräkylä M., Tervahauta A.I., and Kärenlampi S.O. Birch PR-10c interacts with several biologically important ligands. Phytochemistry 66 (2005) 2524-2533
34. Kwaaitaal M.A.C.J., and de Vries S.C. The SERK1 gene is expressed in procambium and in immature vascular cells. J. Exp. Bot. 58 (2007) 2887-2896
35. Kwong R.W., Bui A.Q., Lee H., Kwong L.W., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., and Harada J.J. LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE defines a class of regulators essential for embryo development. Plant Cell 15 (2003) 5-18
36. Legrand S., Hendricks T., Hilbert J.L., and Quillet M.C. Characterization of expressed sequence tags obtained by SSH during somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium intybus L. BMC Plant Biol. 7 (2007) 27
37. Li J., Wen J., Lease K.A., Doke J.T., Tax F.E., and Walker J.C. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 110 (2002) 213-222
38. Liu J.J., and Ekramoddoullah A.K.M. The family 10 of plant pathogenesis-related proteins: their structure, regulation, and function in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 68 (2006) 3-13
39. Maillot P., Kieffer F., and Walter B. Somatic embryogenesis from stem nodal sections of grapevine. Vitis 45 4 (2006) 185-189
40. Markovic-Housley Z., Degano M., Lamba D., von Roepenack-Lahaye E., Clemens S., Susani M., Ferreira F., Scheiner O., and Breiteneder H. Crystal structure of a hypoallergenic isoform of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and its likely biological function as a plant sterol carrier. J. Mol. Biol. 325 (2003) 123-133
41. Marsoni M., Bracale M., Espen L., Prinsi B., Negri A.S., and Vannini C. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 27 (2008) 347-356
42. Martinelli L., Candioli E., Costa D., Poletti V., and Rascio N. Morphogenic competence of Vitis rupestris S. secondary somatic embryos with a long culture history. Plant Cell Rep. 20 (2001) 279-284
43. Martinelli L., Gribaudo I., Bertoldi D., Candioli E., and Poletti V. High efficency somatic embryogenesis and plant germination in grapevine cultivars Chardonnay and Brachetto a grappolo lungo. Vitis 40 (2001) 111-115
44. Martinelli L., and Mandolino G. Transgenic grapes (Vitis species. In: Bajaj Y.P.S. (Ed). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 325-338
45. Mogensen J.E., Wimmer R., Larsen J.N., Spangfort M.D., and Otzen D.E. The major birch allergen, Bet v 1, shows afinity for a broad spectrum of physiological ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 23684-23692
46. Morgana C., Di Lorenzo R., and Carimi F. Somatic embryogenesis of Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Sugraone) from stigma and style culture. Vitis 43 (2004) 169-173
47. Murashige T., and Skoog F. A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15 (1962) 473-497
48. Nair R.R., and Dutta Gupta S. High-frequency plant regeneration through cyclic secondary somatic embryogenesis in black pepper (Piper nigrum) L. Plant Cell Rep. 24 (2006) 699-707
49. Nam K.H., and Li J. BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 110 (2002) 203-212
50. Nolan K.E., Irwanto R.R., and Rose R.J. Auxin up-regulates MtSERK1 expression in both Medicago truncatula root-forming and embryogenic cultures. Plant Physiol. 133 (2003) 218-230
51. Perrin M., Gertz C., and Masson J.E. High efficiency initiation of regenerable embryogenic callus from anther filaments of 19-grapevine genotypes grown worldwide. Plant Sci. 167 (2004) 1343-1349
52. Polesani M., Desario F., Ferrarini A., Zamboni A., Pezzotti M., Kortekamp A., and Polverari A. cDNA-AFLP analysis of plant and pathogen genes expressed in grapevine infected with Plasmopara viticola. BMC Genomics 9 (2008) 142
53. Quiroz-Figueroa F.R., Rojas-Herrera R., Galaz-Avalos R.M., and Loyola-Vargas V.M. Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 86 (2006) 285-301
54. Raemakers C.J.J.M., Jacobsen E., and Visser R.G.F. Secondary somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding. Euphytica 81 (1995) 93-107
55. Raghavan V. Role of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in somatic embryogenesis on cultured zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis: cell expansion, cell cycling, and morphogenesis during continuous exposure of embryos to 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 1743-1756
56. Repka V., Kubikova J., and Fischerova I. Immunodetection of PR1-like proteins in grapevine leaves infected with Oidium tuckeri and in elicited suspension cultures. Vitis 39 (2000) 123-127
57. Robert N., Ferran J., Breda C., Coutos-Thévenot P., Boulay M., Buffard D., and Esnault R. Molecular characterization of the incompatible interaction of Vitis vinifera leaves with Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi: Expression of genes coding for stilbene synthase and class 10 PR protein. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107 (2001) 249-261
58. Robert N., Roche K., Lebeau Y., Breda C., Boulay M., Esnault R., and Buffard D. Expression of grapevine chitinase genes in berries and leaves infected by fungal or bacterial pathogens. Plant Sci. 162 (2002) 389-400
59. Rojas-Herrera R., and Loyola-Vargas V.M. Induction of a class III chitinase in foliar explants of Coffea arabica L. during somatic embryogenesis and wounding. Plant Sci. 163 (2002) 705-711
60. Romero-Puertas M.C., McCarthy I., Gomez M., Sandalio L.M., Corpas F.J., Del Rio L.A., and Palma J.M. Reactive oxygen species-mediated enzymatic systems involved in the oxidative action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 27 (2004) 1135-1148
61. Santos M.O., Romano E., Yotoko K.S.C., Tinoco M.L.P., Dias B.B.A., and Aragao F.J.L. Characterisation of the cacao somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase (SERK) gene expressed during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Sci. 168 (2005) 723-729
62. Schellenbaum P., Jacques A., Maillot P., Bertsch C., Mazet F., Farine S., and Walter B. Characterization of VvSERK1, VvSERK2, VvSERK3 and VvL1L genes and their expression during somatic embryogenesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Cell Rep. 27 (2008) 1799-1809
63. Schmidt E.D.L., Guzzo F., Toonen M.A.J., and de Vries S.C. A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 124 (1997) 2049-2062
64. Singla B., Tyagi A.K., Khurana J.P., and Khurana P. Analysis of expression profile of selected genes expressed during auxin-induced somatic embryogenesis in leaf base system of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and their possible interactions. Plant Mol. Biol. 65 (2007) 677-692
65. Somleva M.N., Schmidt E.D.L., and de Vries S.C. Embryogenic cells in Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) explants identified by cell tracking and by SERK expression. Plant Cell Rep. 19 (2000) 718-726
66. Srivastava S., Neil Emery R.J., Kurepin L.V., Reid D.M., Fristensky B., and Kav N.N.V. Pea PR10.1 is a ribonuclease and its transgenic expression elevates cytokinin levels. Plant Growth Regul. 49 (2006) 17-25
67. Thomas C., Meyer D., Himber C., and Steinmetz A. Spatial expression of a sunflower SERK gene during induction of somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42 (2004) 35-42
68. Van Hengel A.J., Tadesse Z., Immerzeel P., Schols H., van Kammen A., and de Vries S.C. N-Acetylglucosamine and glucosamine-containing arabinogalactan proteins control somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 125 (2001) 1880-1890
69. Van Loon L.C., and Van Strien E.A. The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 55 (1999) 85-97
70. Wen J., Vanek-Krebitz M., Hoffmann-Sommergruber K., Scheiner O., and Breiteneder H. The potential of Betv1 homologues, a nuclear multigene family, as phylogenetic markers in flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3 (1997) 317-333
71. Wielgoss A., and Kortekamp A. Comparison of PR1 expression in grapevine cultures after inoculation with a host- and a non-host pathogen. Vitis 45 (2006) 9-13
72. Wiweger M., Farbos I., Ingouff M., Lagercrantz U., and von Arnold S. Expression of Chia4-Pa chitinase genes during somatic and zygotic embryo development in Norway spruce (Picea abies): similarities and differencies between gymnosperm and angiosperm class IV chitinases. J. Exp. Bot. 54 (2003) 2691-2699