Reserve selection with minimum contiguous area restrictions: An application to open space protection planning in suburban Chicago

Biological Conservation

Volumn 142, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1617-1627

  Tóth, Sándor F ^a   Haight, Robert G ^b   Snyder, Stephanie A ^b   George, Sonney ^c   Miller, James R ^d   Gregory, Mark S ^e   Skibbe, Adam M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

0 1 Programming; Contiguity; Reserve design; Spatial optimization; Urban sprawl

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINANCIAL PROVISION; GRASSLAND; HABITAT CONSERVATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; METROPOLITAN AREA; NATURE RESERVE; OPEN SPACE; OPTIMIZATION; PERSISTENCE; RESERVE DESIGN; SUBURBAN AREA; TRADE-OFF;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67349143245     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.037     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alig, R.J., Platinga, A.J., Ahn, S.E., Kline, J.D., 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-587. USDArest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 92 p.
2. Cerdeira J.O., Gaston K.J., and Pinto L.S. Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 (2005) 183-192
3. Davis S.K. Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: effects of patch size, patch shape, and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in southern Saskatchewan. The Auk 121 (2004) 1130-1145
4. Fischer D.T., and Church R.L. Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science 49 (2003) 555-565
5. Forman R.T.T., Reineking B., and Hersperger A.M. Road traffic and nearby grassland bird patterns in a suburbanizing landscape. Environmental Management 29 (2002) 782-800
6. Grassland Conservation Council of British Columbia. (last accessed 19.01.09).
7. Helzer C.J., and Jelinski D.E. The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9 (1999) 1448-1458
8. Herkert J.R., Reinking D.L., Wiedenfeld D.A., Winter M., Zimmerman J.L., Jensen W.E., Finck E.J., Koford R.R., Wolfe D.H., Sherrod D.K., Jenkins M.A., Faaborg J., and Robinson S.K. Effects of prairie fragmentation on the nest success of breeding birds in the midcontinental United States. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 587-594
9. Herkert J.R, Sample D.W., Warner, R.E., 1996. Management of Midwestern grassland landscapes for the conservation of migratory birds. In: Thompson, F.R., III, (Ed.), Managing Midwestern Landscapes for the Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Birds. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. GTR-NC-187. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, pp. 89-116.
10. Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse, 2009. Illinois State Geological Survey, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, State of Illinois. (last accessed 19.01.09).
11. © 1997-2007. 9 Rue de Verdun, 94253 Gentilly CEDEX, France and ILOG, Inc., 1195 W. Fremont Ave., Sunnyvale, California 94087, USA.
12. Johnson D.H., and Igl L.D. Area requirements of grassland birds: a regional perspective. The Auk 118 (2001) 24-34
13. Johnston R.G., and Temple S.A. Assessing habitat quality for birds nesting in fragmented tallgrass prairies. In: Verner J.A., Morrison M.L., and Ralph C.J. (Eds). Wildlife 2000 (1986), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI 245-250
14. Johnston R.G., and Temple S.A. Nest predation and brood parasitism of tallgrass prairie birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 54 (1990) 106-111
15. Kilburn P.D. The forest-prairie ecotone in northeastern Illinois. American Midland Naturalist 62 (1959) 206-217
16. Kingsland S.E. Creating a science of nature reserve design: perspectives from history. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 61-69
17. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
18. Marianov V., ReVelle C.S., and Snyder S.A. Selecting compact habitat reserves for species with differential habitat size needs. Computers and Operations Research 35 (2008) 475-487
19. Miller J.R. Restoration, reconciliation, and reconnecting with nature nearby. Biological Conservation 127 (2006) 356-361
20. Moilanen A. Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. The American Naturalist 165 (2005) 695-706
21. Moilanen A., Franco A.M.A., Early R.I., Fox R., Wintle B., and Thomas C.D. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272 (2005) 1885-1891
22. Nalle D.J., Arthur J.L., and Sessions J. Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Forest Science 48 (2002) 59-68
23. Nelson H.K., and Duebbert H.F. New concepts regarding the production of waterfowl and other gamebirds in areas of diversified agriculture. Proceedings of the International Congress of Game Biology 11 (1974) 385-394
24. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B 269 (2002) 2437-2441
25. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Selection of a minimum-boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270 (2003) 1487-1491
26. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Designing a conservation reserve network with minimal fragmentation: a linear integer programming approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 (2005) 193-202
27. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research 54 (2006) 379-388
28. Önal H., and Wang Y. A graph theory approach for designing conservation reserve networks with minimal fragmentation. Networks 52 (2008) 142-152
29. Openlands Project. 1999. Under Pressure: Land Consumption in the Chicago Region, 1998-2028. Openlands Project, Chicago, IL.
30. Pareto V. Manuel d'Economie Politique. 2nd ed. (1909), Marcel Giard, Paris
31. Polasky S. You can't always get what you want: conservation planning with feedback effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (2006) 5245-5246
32. Pressey R.L., Cabeza M., Watts M.E., Cowling R.M., and Wilson K.A. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22 (2007) 583-592
33. Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I., and Williams P.H. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 (1993) 124-128
34. Rebain S., and McDill M.E. Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effect of harvest opening size restrictions?. International Transactions in Operational Research 10 (2003) 499-513
35. Rebain S., and McDill M.E. A mixed-integer formulation of the minimum patch size problem. Forest Science 49 (2003) 608-618
36. ReVelle C.S., Williams J.C., and Boland J.J. Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 71-80
37. Rodrigues A.S.L., and Gaston K.J. Optimisation in reserve selection procedures - why not?. Biological Conservation 107 (2002) 123-129
38. Snyder S.A., Miller J.R., Skibbe A.M., and Haight R.G. Habitat acquisition strategies for grassland birds in an urbanizing landscape. Environmental Management 40 (2007) 981-992
39. Tóth S.F., McDill M.E., and Rebain S. Finding the efficient frontier of a bi-criteria, spatially-explicit harvest scheduling problem. Forest Science 52 (2006) 93-107
40. Tóth S.F., and McDill M.E. Promoting large, compact mature forest patches in harvest scheduling models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13 (2008) 1-15
41. Trust for Public Land and Land Trust Alliance, 2004. LandVote 2003: Americans Invest in Parks and Open Space. Trust for Public Land, Washington, DC.
42. Williams J.C. A zero-one programming model for contiguous land acquisition. Geographical Analysis 34 (2002) 330-349
43. Williams J.C., and ReVelle C.S. A 0-1 programming approach to delineating protected reserves. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23 (1996) 607-624
44. Williams J.C., and ReVelle C.S. Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research 104 (1998) 497-509
45. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S., and Levin S.A. Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 (2005) 163-181