Sequential organization of speech in computational auditory scene analysis

Speech Communication

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 657-667

  Shao, Yang ^a   Wang, DeLiang ^a,b  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary time frequency mask; Computational auditory scene analysis; Sequential organization; Speaker quantization

Indexed keywords

BACKGROUND MODEL; BINARY TIME-FREQUENCY MASK; COMPUTATIONAL AUDITORY SCENE ANALYSIS; GENERIC MODELS; HUMAN LISTENERS; PERFORMANCE LEVEL; PRIOR INFORMATION; SEQUENTIAL GROUPING; SEQUENTIAL ORGANIZATION; SPEAKER MODEL; SPEAKER QUANTIZATION; SPEECH INTERFERENCE; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 67349134831     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barker J., Cooke M., and Ellis D. Decoding speech in the presence of other sources. Speech Comm. 45 1 (2005) 5-25
2. Ben, M., Blouet, R., Bimbot, F., 2002. A Monte Carlo method for score normalization in automatic speaker verification using Kullback-Leibler distances. In: Proc. ICASSP, Vol. I, pp. 689-692.
3. Bimbot F., Bonastre J., Fredouille C., Gravier G., Magrin-Chagnolleau I., Meignier S., Merlin T., Ortega-Garcia J., Petrovska-Delacretaz D., and Reynolds D.A. A tutorial on text-independent speaker verification. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 4 (2004) 430-451
4. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
5. Brungart D.S. Information and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 109 (2001) 1101-1109
6. Cherry E.C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 25 (1953) 975-979
7. Cooke, M.P., Lee, T.W., 2006. Speech separation and recognition competition. Available at .
8. Deng L., Droppo J., and Acero A. Dynamic compensation of Hmm variants using the feature enhancement uncertainty computed from a parametric model of speech distortion. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 13 (2005) 412-421
9. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., and Stork D.G. Pattern Classification. second ed. (2001), Wiley, New York
10. Dunn R.B., Reynolds D.A., and Quatieri T.F. Approaches to speaker detection and tracking in conversational speech. Digital Signal Process. 10 (2000) 93-112
11. Ellis D.P.W. Model-based scene analysis. In: Wang D.L., and Brown G.J. (Eds). Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications (2006), Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ 115-146
12. Furui S. Digital Speech Processing, Synthesis, and Recognition (2001), Marcel Dekker, New York
13. Helmholtz, H., 1863. On the Sensation of Tone (A.J. Ellis, Trans.), Second English ed., Dover Publishers, New York.
14. Hershey, J.R., Olsen, P.A., 2007. Approximating the Kullback-Leibler divergence between Gaussian mixture models. In: Proc. ICASSP, Vol. IV, pp. 317-320.
15. Hu, G., 2006. Monaural speech organization and segregation. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
16. Hu G., and Wang D.L. Monaural speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 15 (2004) 1135-1150
17. Hu G., and Wang D.L. An auditory scene analysis approach to monaural speech separation. In: Hansler E., and Schmidt G. (Eds). Topics in Acoustic Echo and Noise Control (2006), Springer, Heidelberg 485-515
18. Hu G., and Wang D.L. Segregation of unvoiced speech from nonspeech interference. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 124 (2008) 1306-1319
19. Huang X., Acero A., and Hon H. Spoken Language Processing (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
20. Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics (1968), Dover, New York
21. Kwon, S., Narayanan, S., 2004. Speaker model quantization for unsupervised speaker indexing. In: Proc. ICSLP, pp. 1517-1520.
22. Kwon S., and Narayanan S. Unsupervised speaker indexing using generic models. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 13 5 (2005) 1004-1013
23. Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. fifth ed. (2003), Academic, San Diego
24. Patterson, R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Holdsworth J., Rice P., 1988. An efficient auditory filterbank based on the gammatone function. APU Report 2341, Cambridge, UK, MRC Applied Psychology Unit.
25. Przybocki, M.A., Martin, A.F., 2004. NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation Chronicles. In: Proc. Odyssey 2004.
26. Quatieri T.F., and Danisewicz R.G. An approach to co-channel talker interference suppression using a sinusoidal model for speech. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38 (1990) 56-69
27. Raj B., Seltzer M.L., and Stern R.M. Reconstruction of missing features for robust speech recognition. Speech Comm. 43 (2004) 275-296
28. Reynolds D.A. Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. Speech Comm. 17 (1995) 91-108
29. Reynolds D.A., Quatieri T.F., and Dunn R.B. Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digital Signal Process. 10 (2000) 19-41
30. Rice J.A. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis (1995), Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA
31. Russell S., and Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. second ed. (2003), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
32. Shao, Y., 2007. Sequential organization in computational auditory scene analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
33. Shao, Y., Srinivasan, S., Wang, D.L., 2007. Incorporating auditory feature uncertainties in robust speaker identification. In: Proc. ICASSP, Vol. IV, pp. 277-280.
34. Shao Y., and Wang D.L. Model-based sequential organization in cochannel speech. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14 1 (2006) 289-298
35. Silva J., and Narayanan S. Average divergence distance as a statistical discrimination measure for hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14 3 (2006) 890-906
36. Srinivasan S., and Wang D.L. Transforming binary uncertainties for robust speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 15 7 (2007) 2130-2140
37. Varga A., and Steeneken H.J.M. Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. Noisex-92: a database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems. Speech Comm. 12 3 (1993) 247-251
38. Vasconcelos N. On the efficient evaluation of probabilistic similarity functions for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 50 7 (2004) 1482-1496
39. Wang D.L. On ideal binary mask as the computational goal of auditory scene analysis. In: Divenyi P. (Ed). Speech Separation by Humans and Machines (2005), Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA 181-197
40. Wang D.L. Feature-based speech segregation. In: Wang D.L., and Brown G.J. (Eds). Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications (2006), Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ 81-114
41. In: Wang D.L., and Brown G.J. (Eds). Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications (2006), Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ