A D-optimal design approach to constrained multiresponse robust design with prioritized mean and variance considerations

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 237-245

  Kovach, Jami ^a   Cho, Byung Rae ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

D optimal design; Experimental restrictions and constraints; Mean and variance; Multiresponse robust design problems; Nonlinear goal programming; Optimal experimental designs

Indexed keywords

D-OPTIMAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL RESTRICTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS; MEAN AND VARIANCE; MULTIRESPONSE ROBUST DESIGN PROBLEMS; NONLINEAR GOAL PROGRAMMING; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MEASUREMENT THEORY; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICS;

DESIGN;

EID: 67349130825     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Atkinson A., Donev A., and Tobias R. Optimum experimental designs, with SAS (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Box G. Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations. Technometrics 30 1 (1988) 1-17
3. Box G.E.P., and Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 13 1 (1951) 1-45
4. Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Management models and industrial applications of linear programming, V. 2v. 2 (1961), John Wiley & Sons, New York
5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Ferguson R.O. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science 1 2 (1955) 138-151
6. Cho, B. R. (1994). Optimization issues in quality engineering, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Oklahoma.
7. Cho B.R., and Park C. Robust design modeling and optimization with unbalanced data. Computers and Industrial Engineering 48 2 (2005) 173-180
8. Del Castillo E., and Montgomery D.C. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 25 3 (1993) 199-204
9. Derringer G., and Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 12 4 (1980) 214-219
10. Forman E.H., and Gass S.I. The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An exposition. Operations Research 49 4 (2001) 469-486
11. Gass S.I. A process for determining priorities and weights for large scale linear goal programmes. Journal of the Operations Research Society 37 (1987) 779-785
12. Harrington E.C. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 21 10 (1965) 494-498
13. Hillier F.S., and Lieberman G.J. Introduction to operations research (2005), McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Ignizio J.P. Goal programming and extensions (1976), Lexington Books, Lexington, MA
15. Ignizio J.P., and Cavalier T.M. Linear programming (1994), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
16. Kackar R.N. Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology 17 4 (1985) 176-188
17. Khuri A.I., and Conlon M. Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics 23 4 (1981) 363-375
18. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 21 2 (1959) 272-319
19. Kiefer J. Optimum designs in regression problems, II. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 1 (1961) 298-325
20. Kiefer J., and Wolfowitz J. Optimum designs in regression problems. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30 2 (1959) 271-294
21. Kim K.J., and Lin D.K.J. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 30 1 (1998) 1-10
22. Kim Y.J., and Cho B.R. Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering 14 3 (2002) 355-363
23. Kovach J., and Cho B.R. A D-optimal design approach to robust design under constraints: A new design for six sigma tool. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage 2 4 (2006) 389-403
24. Kovach J., and Cho B.R. Constrained robust design experiments and optimization with the consideration of uncontrollable factors. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 38 1-2 (2008) 7-18
25. Kovach J., and Cho B.R. Solving multiresponse optimization problems using quality function based robust design. Quality Engineering 20 3 (2008) 346-360
26. Lee S.M. Goal programming for decision analysis (1972), Auerbach Publishers, Philadelphia
27. Lin D.K.J., and Tu W. Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 27 1 (1995) 34-39
28. Matlab. (2007). Available from: http://www.mathworks.com (accessed 4 January 2007).
29. Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
30. Montgomery D.C., Loredo E.N., Jearkpaporn D., and Testik M.C. Experimental designs for constrained regions. Quality Engineering 14 4 (2002) 587-601
31. Myers R.H., and Carter W.H. Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics 15 2 (1973) 301-317
32. Nair V.N., Abraham B., MacKay J., Nelder J.A., Box G., Phadke M.S., et al. Taguchi's parameter design: A panel discussion. Technometrics 34 2 (1992) 127-161
33. Park C., and Cho B.R. Development of robust design under contaminated and non-normal data. Quality Engineering 15 3 (2003) 463-469
34. Pignatiello J.J. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Transactions 25 3 (1993) 5-15
35. Pukelsheim F. Optimal design of experiments (1993), John Wiley & Sons, New York
36. Romero C. Handbook of critical issues in goal programming (1991), Pergamon Press, Oxford
37. Shin S., and Cho B.R. Bias-specified robust design optimization and its analytical solutions. Computers and Industrial Engineering 48 1 (2005) 129-140
38. Taguchi G. Introduction to quality engineering: Designing quality into products and processes (1986), Krauss International Publications, New York
39. Taguchi G. System of experimental design: Engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs (1987), American Supplier Institute, Dearborn, MI
40. Tamiz M., Mirrazavi S.K., and Jones D.F. Extensions of pareto efficiency analysis to integer goal programming. Omega 27 2 (1999) 179-188
41. Tang L.C., and Xu K. A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 34 4 (2002) 437-447
42. Trzaskalik T., and Michnik J. Multiple objective and goal programming: Recent developments (2002), Springer-Verlag, New York
43. Vining G.C., and Myers R.H. Combining taguchi and response surface philosophies - A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 22 1 (1990) 38-45
44. White B.J. Developing products and their rhetoric from a single Hierarchical model. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society for Technical Communication 43 (1996) 223-224