Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: Some systematic uses of the split-screen technique

Human Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 67-99

  Mondada, Lorenza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Disagreement; Ethnomethodology; Overlap; Participation; Sequentiality; Social interaction; Turn taking; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349129799     PISSN: 01638548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-009-9110-8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. P Auer 2002 Projection in interaction and projection in grammar Interaction and Linguistic Structures 33 39
2. Ball, M. (2000). The visual availability and local organization of public surveillance systems: The promotion of social order in public space. Sociological Research Online, 5(1) ( www.socresonline.org.uk ).
3. J Bavelas J Gerwing C Sutton D Prevost 2008 Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility Journal of Memory and Language 58 495 520
4. Broth, M. (2004). The production of a live TV-interview through mediated interaction. In C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius, H. Kleijer, B. van Hilten (Eds.), Recent developments and applications in social research methodology (Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Logic and Methodology, August 17-20, 2004, Amsterdam). Amsterdam: SISWO ( http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/RC33Broth.pdf ).
5. M Broth 2008 The studio interaction as a contextual resource for TV-production Journal of Pragmatics 40 5 904 926
6. Buscher, M. (2005). Social life under the microscope? Sociological Research Online, 10 (1) ( http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/1.html ).
7. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
8. H Garfinkel M Lynch E Livingston 1981 The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 131 158
9. C Goodwin 1994 Professional vision American Anthropologist 96 3 606 633 (Pubitemid 24821425)
10. C Goodwin 1995 Seeing in depth Social Studies of Science 25 2 237 274
11. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 157-182). London: Sage.
12. C Heath 2002 Configuring awareness CSCW 11 3-4 317 347
13. H Heritage 2002 The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content Journal of Pragmatics 34 1427 1446
14. Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington: University Press of America.
15. T Koschmann C Le Baron C Goodwin A Zemel G Dunnington 2007 Formulating the triangle of doom Gesture 7 1 97 118
16. Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis methodology and methods (pp. 183-192). Bern: Lang.
17. Laurier, E., Strebel, I., Brown, B. (2008). Video analysis: Lessons from professional video editing practice. FQS (Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research), 9 (3) ( www.qualitative-research.net/ ).
18. Lomax, H., & Casey, N. (1998). Recording social life: Reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online, 3(2) ( www.socresonline.org.uk ).
19. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20. M Lynch 1988 The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences Human Studies 11 201 234
21. M Lynch 2006 Cognitive activities without cognition? Ethnomethodological investigations of selected 'cognitive' topics Discourse Studies 8 1 95 104
22. Macbeth, D. (1999). Glances, trances, and their relevance for a visual sociology. In P. L. Jalbert (Ed.), Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches (pp. 135-170). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
23. L Mondada 2003 Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions Visual Studies 18 1 58 72
24. Mondada, L. (2005). Visions controversées de la carte: Construire le visible par les gestes et la parole en interaction. In C. D'Alessandro, et al. (Eds.), Espaces, savoirs et incertitudes (pp. 15-31). Paris: Belin.
25. Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation- configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, et al. (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51-68). Bern: Lang.
26. L Mondada 2007 Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers Discourse Studies 9 2 195 226
27. L Mondada 2007 Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices Discourse Studies 9 6 809 821
28. Mondada, L. (2007c). Operating together through videoconference: Members' procedures for accomplishing a common space of action. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Orders of ordinary action (pp. 51-67). Aldershot: Ashgate.
29. Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics (in press).
30. Perakyla, A., & Ruusuvuori, A. (2006). Facial expression in an assessment. In H. J. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 127-142). Bern: Lang.
31. Relieu, M. (1999). La réalisation et la réception du produit télévisuel comme accomplissements. In J.-P. Desgoutte (Ed.), La mise en scène du discours audiovisuel (pp. 35-65). Paris: L'Harmattan.
32. Sacks, H. (1972a). Notes on police assessment of moral character. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 280-293). New York: Free Press.
33. Sacks, H. (1972b). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational materials for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31-74). New York: Free Press.
34. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to tersons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.
36. EA Schegloff 1980 Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?" Sociological Inquiry 50 104 152
37. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437-485). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
38. D vom Lehn C Heath J Hindmarsh 2001 Exhibiting interaction: Conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries Symbolic Interaction 24 89 216 (Pubitemid 33571392)
39. Whalen, M., & Whalen, J. (2004). Studying workspaces. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 208-229). Georgetown University Press: Washington.
40. Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M. (1971). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 80-104). Chicago: Aldine.