Cerebral Embolization during Transcervical Carotid Stenting with Flow Reversal: A Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Study

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 429-435

  Faraglia, Vittorio ^a   Palombo, Giovanni ^a   Stella, Nazzareno ^a   Rizzo, Luigi ^a   Taurino, Maurizio ^a   Bozzao, Alessandro ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; HEPARIN;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; AORTA ARCH; AORTA PROSTHESIS; ARTERY SPASM; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL CALCIFICATION; BRADYCARDIA; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN EMBOLISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; LERICHE SYNDROME; LOADING DRUG DOSE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPROTECTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; STENT; STROKE; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CAROTID STENOSIS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERFUSION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67349120532     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hobson R.W. Carotid artery stenting. Surg Clin North Am 84 (2004) 1281-1294
2. Bush R.L., Kougias P., Guerrero M.A., et al. A comparison of carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection versus carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. Am J Surg 190 (2005) 696-700
3. Yadav J.S., Wholey M.H., Kuntz R.E., et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1493-1501
4. Bosiers M., Peeters P., Deloose K., et al. Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg 46 (2005) 241-247
5. Warach S., Gaa J., Siewert B., et al. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 37 (1995) 231-241
6. Piñero P., González A., Mayol A., et al. Silent ischemia after neuroprotected percutaneous carotid stenting: a diffusion-weighted MRI study. Am J Neuroradiol 27 (2006) 1338-1345
7. Cosottini M., Michelassi M.C., Puglioli M., et al. Silent cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients treated with protected and unprotected carotid artery stenting. Stroke 36 (2005) 2389-2393
8. Hammer F.D., Lacroix V., Duprez T., et al. Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients: results of a 2-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg 42 (2005) 847-853
9. Bendszus M., Koltzenburg M., Burger R., et al. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 354 (1999) 1594-1597
10. Setacci C., de Donato G., Chisci E., et al. Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous?. J Endovasc Ther 13 (2006) 302-309
11. Faggioli G.L., Ferri M., Freyrie A., et al. Aortic arch anomalies are associated with increased risk of neurological events in carotid stent procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33 (2007) 436-441
12. Müller-Hülsbeck S., Jahnke T., Liess C., et al. Comparison of various cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stent placement: an in vitro experiment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2003) 613-620
13. Parodi J.C., Schonholz C., Parodi F.E., et al. Initial 200 cases of carotid artery stenting using a reversal-of-flow cerebral protection device. J Cardiovasc Surg 48 (2007) 117-124
14. Chang D.W., Schubart P.J., Veith F.J., et al. A new approach to carotid angioplasty and stenting with transcervical occlusion and protective shunting: why it may be a better carotid artery intervention. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 994-1002
15. Criado E., Doblas M., Fontcuberta J., et al. Transcervical carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with carotid flow reversal: surgical technique. Ann Vasc Surg 18 (2004) 257-261
16. Criado E., Doblas M., Fontcuberta J., et al. Transcervical carotid stenting with internal carotid flow reversal: feasibility and preliminary results. J Vasc Surg 40 (2004) 476-481
17. Pipinos I.I., Johanning J.M., Pham C.N., et al. Transcervical approach with protective flow reversal for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 446-453
18. Criado E., Fontcuberta J., Orgaz A., et al. Transcervical carotid stenting with carotid artery flow reversal: 3-year follow-up of 103 stents. J Vasc Surg 46 (2007) 864-869
19. Alvarez B., Ribo M., Maeso J., et al. Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal is safe in octogenarians: a preliminary safety study. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008) 96-100
20. Geroulakos G., Ramaswami G., Nicolaides A., et al. Characterisation of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 80 (1993) 1274-1277
21. Wholey M.H., Al-Mubarek N., and Wholey M.H. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60 (2003) 259-266
22. Setacci C., Chisci E., de Donato G., et al. Carotid artery stenting in a single center: are six years of experience enough to achieve the standard of care?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34 (2007) 655-662
23. Gupta R., Abou-Chebl A., Bajzer C.T., et al. Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 1538-1543
24. Qureshi A.I., Luft A.R., Sharma M., et al. Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 30 (1999) 2086-2093
25. Faraglia V., Palombo G., Stella N., et al. Cerebral embolization in patients undergoing protected carotid-artery stenting and carotid surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 48 (2007) 683-688
26. Flach H.Z., Ouhlous M., Hendriks J.M., et al. Cerebral ischaemia after carotid intervention. J Endovasc Surg 11 (2003) 251-257
27. Schmidt A., Diedrich K.W., Scheinert S., et al. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 1966-1969
28. du Mesnil de Rochemont R., Schneider S., Yan B., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions after filter-protected stenting of high-grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27 (2006) 1321-1325
29. Schlüter M., Tübler T., Steffens J.C., et al. Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1007-1013
30. Ribo M., Molina C.A., Alvarez B., et al. Transcranial Doppler monitoring of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: a novel carotid revascularization technique. Stroke 37 (2006) 2846-2849
31. Parodi J.C., Ferreira L.M., Sicard G., et al. Cerebral protection during carotid stenting using flow reversal. J Vasc Surg 41 (2005) 416-422
32. El-Koussy M., Schroth G., Do D.D., et al. Periprocedural embolic events related to carotid artery stenting detected by diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison between proximal and distal embolus protection devices. J Endovasc Ther 14 (2007) 293-303
33. Asakura F., Kawaguchi K., Sakaida H., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in carotid angioplasty and stenting with protection by the reversed carotid arterial flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27 (2006) 753-758
34. Matas M., Alvarez B., Ribo M., et al. Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: experience in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 46 (2007) 49-54