Appearence of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas

European Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1337-1346

  Fleury, Eduardo F C ^a,b,c   Rinaldi, Jose F ^a,b   Piato, Sebastiao ^a,b   Fleury, Jose Carlos V ^a,b   Junior, Decio Roveda ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b IRMANDADE DA SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c Alameda Ministro Rocha Azevedo   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast; Elastography; Fibroadenoma; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDULLARY CARCINOMA; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FIBROADENOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67349114869     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1285-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196(1):14-15
2. Sickles EA (1994) Management of probably benign lesions of the breast. Radiology 193(2):582-583
3. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207(1):191-199
4. Norton LW, Zeligman BE, Pearlman NW (1988) Accuracy and cost of needle localization breast biopsy. Arch Surg 123(8):947-950
5. Brenner RJ, Sickles EA (1989) Acceptability of periodic follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign. Radiology 171(3):645-646
6. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1):165-175
7. Gordon PB, Gagnon FA, Lanzkowsky L (2003) Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: Acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up. Radiology 229(1):233-238
8. Rubin E (1999) Six-month follow-up: An alternative view. Radiology 213:15-18
9. Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244(1):87-93
10. Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, Franceschini G, Mulè A, Bonomo L (2006) Characterization of solid breast masses: Use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. J Ultrasound Med 25(5):649-659
11. Zonderland HM, Pope TL Jr, Nieborg AJ (2004) The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol 14(10):1743-1750
12. Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, Kwak JY, You JK, Kim MJ, Park BW (2008) Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assesment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1209-1215
13. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1260-1265
14. Tohno E, Ueno E (2008) Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer 15(3):200-204
15. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, Mariani L, Marchesini M, Suman L, Folini C, Bergonzi S (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18(11):2831-2839
16. Goel NB, Knight TE, Pandey S, Riddick-Young M, Paredes ES, Trivedi A (2005) Fibrous lesions of the breast: Imaging-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 25(6):1547-1559
17. Gokalp G, Topal U, Kizilkaya E (2008) Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses? Eur J Radiol. doi: 10.1016/ j.ejrad.2007.12.007
18. Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H (1999) Breast fibroadenoma: Mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced mr imaging - pilot study. Radiology 210(1):233-240
19. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E (1989) Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology 172(3):671-675
20. Fleury EFC, Rinaldi JFR, Piato S, Fleury JCV, Roveda JRD (2008) Features of cystic breast lesions at ultrasound elastography. Radiol Bras 41(3):167-172
21. Youden D (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32-35
22. Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast us in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221(3):641-649
23. Roveda Junior D, Piato S, Oliveira VM, Ferreira CAP, Fleury ECF (2007) Valores preditivos das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do sistema BI-RADS em lesões mamárias nodulares não-palpáveis avaliadas por mamografia, ultra-sonografia e ressonância magnâtica. Radiol Bras 40(2):93-98
24. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: Interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239(2):385-391
25. Sickles EA (1999) Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 213(1):11-14
26. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196(1):123-134 1995
27. Mainiero MB, Goldkamp A, Lazarus E, Livingston L, Koelliker SL, Schepps B, Mayo-Smith WW (2005) Characterization of breast masses with sonography: Can biopsy of some solid masses be deferred? J Ultrasound Med 24(2):161-167
28. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13(2):111-134
29. Hoyt K, Forsberg F, Ophir J (2006) Analysis of a hybrid spectral strain estimation technique in elastography. Phys Med Biol 51(2):197-209
30. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T (2006) Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 238(2):341-350