Phenolic resin binder for the production of metallurgical quality briquettes from coke breeze: Part III the effect of the type of acidic hardeners on the quality of the formed coke and the possibility to avoid the curing stage to produce metallurgical briquettes with enough strength

Fuel Processing Technology

Volumn 90, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 971-979

  Benk, Ayse ^a   Talu, Muzaffer ^b   Coban, Abdullah ^a  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coke breeze; Cured briquettes; Formed coke; Hardener; Latent curing agent; Resole

Indexed keywords

COKE BREEZE; CURED BRIQUETTES; FORMED COKE; HARDENER; LATENT CURING AGENT; RESOLE;

BINDERS; BLENDING; CURING; HARDENING; METALLURGICAL COKE; METALLURGY; PHENOLIC RESINS; PHENOLS; RESINS; SECURITY SYSTEMS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BRIQUETS;

EID: 67349113775     PISSN: 03783820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Benk A., Talu M., and Coban A. Phenolic resin binder for the production of metallurgical quality briquettes from coke breeze: part I. Fuel Processing Technology 89 (2008) 28-37
2. Benk A., Talu M., and Coban A. Phenolic resin binder fort he production of metallurgical quality briquettes from coke breeze: part II the effect of the type of the basic catalyst used in the resol production on the tensile strength of the formed coke briquettes. Fuel Processing Technology 89 (2008) 38-46
3. Graf R., Kaiser M.E., Lehr K., and Six W. US Patent (2005) (US6967223 B1)
4. Nakai S., Kato M., and Sawa M. US Patent (2001) (US 6326418 B1)
5. Qureshi S.P., and Chan C. US Patent (1999) (US5864003)
6. Astaloa-Aierbe G., Echeverria J.M., Martin M.D., Exteberria A.M., and Mondragon I. Influence of the initial formaldehyde to phenol molar ratio (F/P) on the formation of a phenolic resole resin catalyzed with amine. Polymer 41 (2000) 6797-6802
7. Astaloa-Aierbe G., Echeverria J.M., Vazquez A., and Mondragon I. Influence of the amount of catalyst and initial pH on the phenolic resol resin formation. Polymer 41 (2000) 3311-3315
8. A. Benk, PhD. Thesis, Fenolik reçineleri baǧlayi{dotless}ci{dotless} olarak kullanarak kok tozundan döküm koku ve metalürjik kok üretimi, Gazi Üniversitesi, (Ankara) 2001.
9. Thibaut Ch.G. Solid products of carbonization. In: Lowry H.H. (Ed). Chemistry of Coal Utilization, Supplementary Volume (1963), Wiley, New York-London 494-538
10. ASTM Standard D3402-81. Standard Method of Tumbler Test for Coke. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.
11. H.E. Blayden, Yb. Coke Oven Mgrs' Ass. (1966) 197.
12. Patrick J.W., and Stacey A.E. The strength of industrial cokes: part 1. Variability of tensile strength in relation to fissure formation. Fuel 51 (1972) 81-87
13. Patrick J.W., Stacey A.E., and Wilkinson H.C. The strength of industrial cokes: part 2. Tensile strength of foundry cokes. Fuel 51 (1972) 174-179
14. A. Coban, PhD. Thesis, Production of a metallurgical quality formed coke from Turkish lignite, University of Leeds, (England) 1980.
15. Taylor J.W., and Coban A. Factors affecting the tensile strength of formed coke made from lignite char. Fuel 66 (1987) 1274-1280
16. Sato H., Patrick J.W., and Walker A. Effect of coal properties and porous structure on tensile strength of metallurgical coke. Fuel 77 (1998) 1203-1208
17. Sharma A.K., Das B.P., and Tripathi S.M. Influence of properties of bituminous binders on the strength of formed coke. Fuel Processing Technology 75 (2002) 201-214