A WebGis tool for seismic hazard scenarios and risk analysis

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1274-1281

  Pessina, Vera ^a   Meroni, Fabrizio ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

ALOV; Earthquake scenario; Risk assessment; Seismic hazard; WebGis

Indexed keywords

ALOV; EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; GROUND-SHAKING; HANDLING TOOLS; NATURAL HAZARD; NORTHERN ITALY; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SEISMIC RISK; SPATIAL DATA; WEB TECHNOLOGIES; WEBGIS; WEBGIS SYSTEM;

DATA HANDLING; EARTHQUAKES; HAZARDS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SAFETY FACTOR; SEISMIC DESIGN;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EARTHQUAKE EVENT; GIS; GROUND MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC HAZARD; SHAKING TABLE TEST; SPATIAL DATA;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; LAKE GARDA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 67349103391     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sui D.Z., and Goodchild M.F. GIS as media?. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15 5 (2001) 387-390
2. Yang C., Wong D.W., Yang R., Kafatos M., and Li Q. Performance-improving techniques in web-based GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19 3 (2005) 319-342
3. Martinelli F., and Meletti C. A WebGIS application for rendering seismic hazard data in Italy. Seismological Res Lett 79 1 (2008) 68-78
4. Qu C., Ye H., and Liu Z. Application of WebGis in seismological study. Acta Seismological Sinica 15 1 (2002) 99-106
5. Hara S, Ishikawa M, Koyama M, Satake K, Tsuji Y, Hayakawa Y, et al. Application of GIS to historical earthquakes documents in Japan. In: PNC 2005 Annual Conference in conjunction with PRDLA, ECAI. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii at Manoa; 2005. 5p.
6. UNDRO (United Nations Disater Relief Coordinator). Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. Report of Expert Group Meeting 9-12 July 1979, Geneva. Office of United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator; 1979. 53p.
7. Grandori G., Drei A., Perotti F., and Tagliani A. Macroseismic intensity versus epicentral distance: the case of central Italy. Tectonophysics 193 (1991) 165-171
8. Faccioli E, Cauzzi C. Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland; 2006. Paper number 569.
9. Sabetta F., and Pugliese A. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismological Soc Am 86 2 (1996) 337-352
10. Pacor F., Cultrera G., Mendez A., and Cocco M. Finite fault modeling of strong motion using a hybrid deterministic-stochastic approach. Bull Seismological Soc Am 95 1 (2005) 225-240
11. Bernard P., and Madariaga R. A new asymptotic method for the modeling of near field accelerograms. Bull Seismological Soc Am 74 2 (1984) 539-557
12. Spudich P., and Frazer N.L. Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull Seismological Soc Am 74 6 (1984) 2061-2082
13. Boore D.M. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160 (2003) 635-676
14. Pessina V, Franceschina G, Vannoli P, Luzi L, Pacor F. Damage distribution and seismological model of the November 2004, Salò (Northen Italy) earthquake. In: Proceeding of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switerland, 2006; Paper number 1371.
15. QUEST (Quick Earthquake Survey Team). Rilievo macrosismico del terremoto del Garda del 24 novembre 2004. Ingegneria Sismica 2005;Anno XXII(2):44-59.
16. L=5.2). Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, in press.
17. Zonno G., García-Fernández M., Jiménez M.J., Menoni S., Meroni F., and Petrini V. The SERGISAI procedure for seismic risk assessment. J Seismology 7 2 (2003) 255-277
18. Lagomarsino S. Il progetto GNDT-Liguria Occidentale: obiettivi, risultati e prodotti. In: Proceeding of the Convegno Nazionale Rischio sismico, territorio e centri storici, Sanremo, Imperia, 2004. p. 289-99.
19. Pessina V, Balbi A. Il Gis a supporto della valutazione di rischio sismico: un approccio integrato a diversa scala territoriale ed ampio campo di indagine. In: Proceeding of the Convegno Nazionale Rischio sismico, territorio e centri storici, Sanremo, Imperia, 2004. p. 349-56.
20. Hisada Y., and Bielak J. A theoretical method for computing near fault ground motion in a layered half-spaces considering static offset due to surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity. Bull Seismological Soc Am 93 3 (2003) 1154-1168
21. Istat. XIII Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Roma; 1991.
22. Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S. A methodology for the vulnerability analysis of built-up areas. In: Proceedings of the international conference on earthquake loss estimation and risk reduction, Bucharest, Romania, October 2002.
23. Agenzia Regionale di Protezione Civile, Direzione Ambiente. Terremoto emiliano del 23 dicembre 2008 ore 16:24. Relazione, 2009. p. 8 〈http://www.protezionecivile.emilia-romagna.it/news/2008/news37/relazione_commissione_1.pdf〉.
24. Faccioli E, Vanini M, Frassine L. Complex site effects in earthquake ground motion, including topography. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London, 2002. Paper number 844.