When vaccine injury claims go to court

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 360, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 2498-2500

  Stewart, Alexandra M ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEASLES MUMPS RUBELLA VACCINE; THIOMERSAL;

ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK; ANAPHYLAXIS; AUTISM; BRAIN DISEASE; COURT; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEASLES; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MUMPS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUBELLA; SHORT SURVEY; VACCINATION; VACCINE PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPENSATION; DRUG INDUSTRY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; UNITED STATES;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; CHILD; COMPENSATION AND REDRESS; DRUG INDUSTRY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE; STATE GOVERNMENT; THIMEROSAL; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION;

EID: 67149146692     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0902316     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Snyder v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Case No. 01-162V.
2. Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Case No. 98-916V.
3. Hazlehurst v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Case No. 03-654V.