Applying multi-criteria decision methods and SWOT factors to analyze the role of information technology in industry development in Iran

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 2983-2990

  Mahdavi, Iraj ^a   Fazlollahtabar, Hamed ^b   Paydar, Mohammad Mahdi ^b   Heidarzade, Armaghan ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c PAYAME NOOR UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

AHP; Industrial development; Information technology; SWOT analysis; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

AHP; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHIES; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION METHODS; QUALITATIVE PARAMETERS; SWOT (STRENGTHS , WEAKNESSES , OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS) ANALYSIS; SWOT ANALYSIS; TOPSIS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDUSTRY;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 67149111745     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.2983.2990     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bernroider, E.W.N., 2007. IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone-McLean model of information systems success. Inform. Manage., 45: 257-269.
2. Djamasbi, S. and D.M. Stronga, 2007. The effect of positive mood on intention to use computerized decision aids. Inform. Manage., 45: 43-51.
3. Grovera, V. and A.H. Segars, 2004. An empirical evaluation of stages of strategic information systems planning: Patterns of process design and effectiveness. Inform. Manage., 42: 761-779.
4. Hainesa, R. and L.N.K. Leonard, 2007. Situational influences on ethical decision-making in an IT context. Inform. Manage., 44: 313-320.
5. Hasemana, W.D., D.L. Nazaretha and S. Paul, 2004. Implementation of a group decision support system utilizing collective memory. Inform. Manage., 42: 591-605.
6. Heo, J. and I. Han, 2003. Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation. Inform. Manage., 40: 243-256.
7. Hsu, M. and C. Chiu, 2004. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Syst.,38: 369-381.
8. Landrum, H. and V.R. Prybutok, 2004. A service quality and success model for the information service industry. Eur. J. Operat. Res., 156: 628-642.
9. Melville, N., V. Gurbaxani and K. Kraemer, 2007. The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Syst., 43: 229-242.
10. Negash, S., T. Ryan and M. Igbaria, 2003. Quality and effectiveness in Webbased customer support systems. Inform. Manage., 40: 757-768.
11. Newkirka, H.E. and A.L. Ledererb, 2005. The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Inform. Manage., 43: 481-501.
12. Nguyen, T.N., 2005. A decision model for managing software development projects. Inform. Manage., 43: 63-75.
13. Shih, H., 2004. Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Inform. Manage., 41: 719-729.
14. Stewart, R., 2007. A framework for the life cycle management of information technology projects: Project IT. Int. J. Project Manage., 26: 203-212.
15. Yu, H.C., Z.Y. Lee and S.C. Chang, 2002. Using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate alternative licensing mechanisms. Inform. Manage., 43: 517-531.