Comparison of three methods of testing hearing in mice

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 318-322

  Quddusi, Taeed ^a   Blakley, Brian W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Electrocochleography; Hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING TEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

ANIMALS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 67049162104     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2009.080084     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Galambos R, Hecox KE. Clinical applications of the auditory brain stem response. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978;11:709-722 (Pubitemid 9119115)
2. Ingham NJ, Thornton SK, Comis SD, et al. The auditory brainstem response of aged guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118:673-680 (Pubitemid 28505600)
3. Campbell KC, Faloon KM, Rybak LP. Noninvasive electrodes for electrocochleography in the chinchilla. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:767-771 (Pubitemid 23198697)
4. Harrison RV. Objective measures of cochlear frequency selectivity in animals and in man. A review. Acta Neurol Belg 1984;84:213-232 (Pubitemid 15194391)
5. Thornton AR. Electrophysiological studies of the auditory system. Audiology 1976;15:23-38.
6. Hochman J, Blakley BW, Wellman M, et al. Prevention of aminoglycoside-induced sensorineural hearing loss. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:153-156 (Pubitemid 43910762)