Evaluation of the accuracy of self-reported smoking in pregnancy when the biomarker level in an active smoker is uncertain

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 670-678

  Burstyn, Igor ^a   Kapur, Nitin ^a   Shalapay, Carol ^a   Bamforth, Fiona ^a   Wild, Cameron T ^a   Liu, Juxin ^a   Legatt, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COTININE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BLOOD LEVEL; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL SMOKING; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CANADA; COHORT STUDIES; COTININE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MATERNAL EXPOSURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING;

EID: 67049143522     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp048     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bardy, A. H., Seppala, T., Lillsunde, P., Kataja, J. M., Koskela, P., Pikkarainen, J., et al. (1993). Objectively measured tobacco exposure during pregnancy: Neonatal effects and relation to maternal smoking. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 100, 721-726.
2. Benowitz, N. L. (1996). Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Epidemiologic Reviews, 18, 188-204.
3. Benowitz, N. L. J. P., Ahijevych, K., Jarvis, M. J., Hall, S., LeHouezec, J., Hansson, A., et al. (2002). Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 4, 149-159.
4. Boyd, N. R., Windsor, R. A., Perkins, L. L., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2 77-83.
5. Britton, G. R., Brinthaupt, J., Stehle, J. M., & James, G. D. (2004). Comparison of self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels in a rural pregnant population. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing, 33, 306-311.
6. Day, N. L., & Robles, N. (1989). Methodological issues in the measurement of substance use. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 562, 8-13.
7. Dempsey, D., Jacob, P., III, & Benowitz, N. L. (2002). Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in pregnant smokers. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy, 301, 594-598.
8. Eskenazi, B., Bradman, A., & Castorina, R. (1999). Exposures of children to organophosphate pesticides and their potential adverse health effects. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107, 409-419.
9. Ford, R. P., Tappin, D. M., Schluter, P. J., & Wild, C. J. (1997). Smoking during pregnancy: How reliable are maternal self reports in New Zealand? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 51, 246-251.
10. Foss, O. P., Haug, K., Hesla, P. E., Lund-Larsen, P. G., & Vasli, L. R. (1998). Can we rely on self-reported smoking habits? Tidsskrift for den Norske lægeforening, 118, 2165-2168.
11. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
12. Gustafson, P. (2004). Measurement error and misclassification in statistics and epidemiology. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
13. Lindqvist, R., Lendahls, L., Tollbom, O., Aberg, H., & Hakansson, A. (2002). Smoking during pregnancy: Comparison of selfreports and cotinine levels in 496 women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 81, 240-244.
14. McDonald, S. D., Perkins, S. L., & Walker, M. C. (2005). Correlation between self-reported smoking status and serum cotinine during pregnancy. A ddictive Behaviors, 30, 853-857.
15. Mullen, P. D., Carbonari, J. P., Tabak, E. R., & Glenday, M. C. (1991). Improving disclosure of smoking by pregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165, 409-413.
16. Pley, E. A., Wouters, E. J., Voorhorst, F. J., Stolte, S. B., Kurver, P. H., & de Jong, P. A. (1991). Assessment of tobacco-exposure during pregnancy; behavioural and biochemical changes. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 40, 197-201.
17. R Development Core Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
18. Reproductive Health Report Working Group. (2004). Alberta reproductive health: Pregnancies and births 2004. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Health and Wellness.
19. Rogers, J. M.(2008). Tobacco and pregnancy: Overview of exposures and effects. Birth Defects Research. Part C, Embryo Today: Reviews, 84 1-15.
20. Walsh, R. A., Redman, S., & Adamson, L. (1996). The accuracy of self-report of smoking status in pregnant women. Addictive Behaviors, 21, 675-679.
21. Windsor, R., Morris, J., Cutter, G., Lowe, J., Higginbotham, J., Perkins, L., et al. (1989). Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of saliva thiocyanate among pregnant women. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 447-452.