Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 499-504

  Puri, Rajesh ^a,b   Vilmann, Peter ^a   Sǎftoiu, Adrian ^c   Skov, Birgit Guldhammer ^a   Linnemann, Dorte ^a   Hassan, Hazem ^b   Garcia, Elymir Soraya Galvis ^d   Gorunescu, Florin ^c  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY OF CRAIOVA   (Romania)

^d Endoscopic Technical Center (CITE)   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA)

Indexed keywords

ADRENAL TUMOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BENIGN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGUS CARCINOMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIVER TUMOR; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDIASTINUM LYMPH NODE; MEDIASTINUM TUMOR; MUCOSA CELL; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; SUCTION; SYRINGE; TARGET CELL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM TUMOR; ECHOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM NEOPLASMS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 67049142370     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: 15027708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365520802647392     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lever JV, Trott PA, Webb AJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology. J Clin Pathol 1985;38:1-11.
2. Mair S, Dunbar F, Becker PJ, Du Plessis W. Fine needle cytology: is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol 1989;33:809-13.
3. Kumarasinghe MP, Sheriffdeen AH. Fine needle sampling without aspiration. Pathology 1995;27:330-2.
4. Bhutani MS, Suryaprasad S, Moezzi J, Seabrook D. Improved technique for performing endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. Endoscopy 1999;31:550-3.
5. Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V, Eloubeidi MA, Etamad R, Matsuda K, et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:441-7.
6. Larghi A, Noffsinger A, Dye CE, Hart J, Waxman I. EUSguided fine needle tissue acquisition by using high negative pressure suction for the evaluation of solid masses: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:768-74.
7. Knuth DE. The art of computer programming volume 2: seminumerical algorithms, 3rd ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional; 1997.
8. Cohen J. Power primer. Psychol Bull 1992;112:155-9.
9. Kate MS, Kamal MM, Bobhate SK, Kher AV. Evaluation of fine needle capillary sampling in superficial and deep-seated lesions. An analysis of 670 cases. Acta Cytol 1998;42:679-84.
10. Kinney TB, Lee MJ, Filomena CA, Krebs TL, Dawson SL, Smith PL, et al. Fine-needle biopsy: prospective comparison of aspiration versus nonaspiration techniques in the abdomen. Radiology 1993;186:549-52.
11. Dey P, Ray R. Comparison of fine needle sampling by capillary action and fine needle aspiration. Cytopathology 1993;4:299-303.
12. Akhtar SS, Imran-Ul-Huq S, Faiz-U-Din M, Reyes LM. Efficacy of fine-needle capillary biopsy in the assessment of patients with superficial lymphadenopathy. Cancer 1997;81: 277-80.
13. Vetrani A, Fulciniti F, Di Benedetto G, Zeppa P, Troncone G, Boscaino A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses. An additional experience with 1153 cases (1985 to 1988) and a meta-analysis. Cancer 1992;69:736-40.
14. Pothier DD, Narula AA. Should we apply suction during fine needle cytology of thyroid lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:643-5.
15. Vilmann P, Hancke S, Henriksen FW, Jacobsen GK. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. A new diagnostic procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:172-3.
16. Mortensen MB, Pless T, Durup J, Ainsworth AP, Plagborg GJ, Hovendal C. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy 2001;33:537-40.
17. Shah JN, Ahmad NA, Beilstein MC, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the management of malignancies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:1069-73.
18. Chang KJ. Maximizing the yield of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S28-34.
19. Vilmann P, Saftoiu A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: equipment and technique. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;21:1646-55.
20. Storch IM, Sussman DA, Jorda M, Ribeiro A. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration vs. fine needle capillary sampling on specimen quality and diagnostic accuracy in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy. Acta Cytol 2007;51:837-42.
21. Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:184-90.
22. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, McGrath K, Imperiale T, Tao LC, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:475-81.