The impact of emerging geographic information technology on soil-landscape modeling

Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling: Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 127-154

  Grunwald, Sabine ^a   Lamsal, Sanjay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS;

CONE PENETROMETERS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; REMOTE SENSORS; SOIL INFORMATION SYSTEM; SOIL SPECTROSCOPIES; SOIL-LANDSCAPE MODELS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 67049118058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (113)

1. RM Lark. Variation in soil conditions and crop performance. In Precision Agri culture-'97, Proc Eur Conf Precision Agric., Warwick University Conference Center, JV Stafford, Ed. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., Oxford, 1997, pp. 127-135.
2. J Bouma, J Stoorvogel, BJ van Alphen, HWG Booltink. Pedology, precision agriculture and the changing paradigms of agricultural research. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63: 1763-1768, 1999.
3. AB McBratney, MJ Pringle. Estimating average and proportional variograms of soil properties and their potential use in precision agriculture. Precision Agric 1: 125-152, 1999.
4. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Data Rich and Information Poor, Report to the Chief of the NRCS by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Natural Resource Inventory and Performance Management. USDA, Washington, DC, 1995.
5. MR Hoosbeek, RG Amundson, RB Byrant. Pedological modeling. In Handbook of Soil Science A, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 2000, pp. 321-352.
6. PA Burrough, RA McDonnell. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
7. D Peuquet. Presentations of geographic space: towards a conceptual synthesis. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 78: 375-394, 1988.
8. M Goodchild, G Sun, S Yang. Development and test of an error model for categorical data. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 6: 87-104, 1992.
9. SW Buol, FD Hole, TJ McCracken, RJ Southard. Soil Genesis and Classification. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1997.
10. JC Bell. Assessment, Description and Delineation of Soil Spatial Variability at Hillslope to Landscape Scales. Paper presented at Proceedings of Pedometrics, Madison, WI, 1997.
11. S Nortcliff. Soil variability and reconnaissance soil mapping: a statistical study in Norfolk. J Soil Sci 29: 403-418, 1978.
12. PA Burrough. Sampling design for quantifying map unit composition. In Spatial Variabilities of Soils and Landforms, SSSA Special Publication 28, MJ Mausbach, LP Winding, Eds. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1991, pp. 89-125.
13. GBM Heuvelink, JA Huisman. Choosing between abrupt and gradual spatial variation? In Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty in Natural Resources: Theory and Applications for GIS and Remote Sensing, HT Mowrer, RG Congalton, Eds. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 2000, pp. 111-117.
14. PA Burrough, PFM van Gaans, R Hootsmans. Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 77: 115-135, 1997.
15. SW Bie, PHT Beckett. Comparison of four independent surveys by air-photo interpretation, Paphos area (Cyprus). Photogrammetria 29: 189-202, 1973.
16. EH Isaaks, RM Srivastava. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.
17. P Goovaerts. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.
18. R Webster, MA Oliver. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
19. JP Chilès, P Delfiner. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.
20. P Goovaerts. Geostatistical modeling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 103: 3-26, 2001.
21. AB McBratney, IOA Odeh, TFA Bishop, MS Dunbar, TM Shatar. An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97: 293-327, 2000.
22. LA Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338-353, 1965.
23. PA Burrough. Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J Soil Sci 40: 477-792, 1989.
24. PA Burrough, RA MacMillan, WPA van Deursen. Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography. J Soil Sci 43: 193-210, 1992.
25. AB McBratney, JJ De Gruijter. A continuum approach to soil classification using fuzzy k-means with extragrades. J Soil Sci 43: 159-176, 1992.
26. AB McBratney, IOA Odeh. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurement and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77: 85-113, 1997.
27. IOA Odeh, AB McBratney, DJ Chittleborough. Soil pattern recognition with fuzzy-c-means: application to classification and soil-landform interrelationships. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 505-516, 1992.
28. S Grunwald, K McSweeney, DJ Rooney, B Lowery. Soil layer models created with profile cone penetrometer data. Geoderma 103: 181-201, 2001.
29. A-Z Zhu. A similarity model for representing soil spatial information. Geoderma 77: 217-242, 1997.
30. H Bandemer, S Gottwald. Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Methods with Applications. John Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 1995.
31. AK Bregt, J Bouma, M Jellinek. Comparison of thematic maps derived from a soil map and from kriging of point data. Geoderma 39: 281-291, 1987.
32. D Leenhardt, M Voltx, M Bornand, R Webster. Evaluating soil maps for prediction of soil water properties. Eur J Soil Sci 45: 293-301, 1994.
33. AS Rogowski. Quantifying soil variability in GIS applications. II. Spatial distri bution of soil properties. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10: 445-475, 1996.
34. S Shekhar, S Chawla. Spatial Databases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
35. PA Burrough. The technologic paradox in soil survey: new methods and techniques of data capture and handling. Enschede ITC J 3: 15-22, 1993.
36. R Dudal. How good is our soil classification? In Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference, H Eswaran, T Rice, R Ahrens, BA Stewart, Eds. CRC Press, New York, 2003, pp. 11-18.
37. J Thurston, TK Poiker, JP Moore. Integrated Geospatial Technologies. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.
38. P Bolstad. GIS Fundamentals. Eider Press, White Bear Lake, MN, 2000.
39. LB Conyers, D Goodman. Ground-Penetrating Radar: An Introduction to Archael-ogists. AltaMara Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 1997.
40. A Tabbagh, M Dabas, A Hesse, C Panissod. Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation. Geoderma 97: 393-404, 2000.
41. CK Johnson, JW Doran, HR Duke, BJ Wienhold, KM Eskridge, JF Shanahan. Field-scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1829-1837, 2001.
42. GW Schellentrager, JA Doolittle, TE Calhoun, CA Wettstein. Using ground-penetrating radar to update soil survey information. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52: 746-752, 1988.
43. JD Rhoades, NA Manteghi, PJ Shouse, WJ Alves. Estimating soil salinity from saturated soil paste electrical conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53: 428-433, 1989.
44. J Doolittle, E Ealy, G Secrist, D Rector, M Crouch. Reconnaissance soil mapping of a small watershed using electromagnetic induction and global positioning system techniques. Soil Surv Horizons 36: 86-94, 1995.
45. NJ Hartsock, TG Mueller, GW Thomas, RJ Barnhisel, KL Wells, SA Shearer. Soil electrical conductivity variability. In Proceedings: Fifth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, ASA Miscellaneous Publication, PC Robert, RH Rust, WE Larson, Eds. ASA, Madison, WI, 2000.
46. E De Jong, AK Suddeth, NR Kitchen, SJ Indorante. Measurement of apparent electrical conductivity of soils by an electromagnetic induction probe to aid in salinity surveys. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43: 810-812, 1979.
47. CLS Morgan, JM Norman, CC Molling, K McSweeney, B Lowery. Evaluating soil data from several sources using a landscape model. In Scaling Methods in Soil Physics, Y Pachepsky, DE Radcliffe, HM Selim, Eds. CRC Press, New York, 2003, pp. 243-260.
48. RE Yoder, RS Freeland, JT Ammons, LL Leonard. Mapping agricultural fields with GPR and EMI to prevent offsite movement of agrochemicals. J Appl Geophys 47: 251-259, 2000.
49. KA Sudduth, NR Kitchen, ST Drummond. Soil conductivity sensing on clay pan soils: comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct methods. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, St. Paul, MN, 1998, pp. 979-990.
50. JA Doolittle, ME Collins. A comparison of EM induction and GPR methods in areas of karst. Geoderma 85: 83-102, 1998.
51. R Rashad, D Kawamura, H Nemoto, T Miyata, K Nakagawa. Ground penetrating radar investigations across the Uemachi fault, Osaka, Japan. J Appl Geophys 53: 63-75, 2003.
52. JL Davis, AP Annan. Applications of ground penetrating radar to mining, ground water, and geotechnical projects: selected case histories. In Ground Penetrating Radar, JA Pilon, Ed. Waterloo Center for Groundwater Research, Waterloo, Can ada, 1992, pp. 1115-1133.
53. TJ Gish, WP Dulaney, KJS Kung, CST Daughtry, JA Doolittle, PT Miller. Eval uating use of ground-penetrating radar for identifying subsurface flow pathways. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 1620-1629, 2002.
54. V Basile, MT Carrozzon, S Negri, L Nuzzo, T Quarta, AV Villani. A ground-penetrating radar survey for archaeological investigations in an urban area (Lecce, Italy). J Appl Geophys 44: 15-32, 2000.
55. S Grunwald, B Lowery, DJ Rooney, K McSweeney. Profile cone penetrometer data used to distinguish between soil materials. Soil Tillage Res 62: 27-40, 2001.
56. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM Standard D5778-95: Standard test method for performing electric friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM, West Conshocken, PA, 1995, p. 576.
57. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). ASAE Standard S313.1: Soil cone penetrometer. In Agricultural Engineers Yearbook of Standards. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, 2000, pp. 832-833.
58. DJ Rooney, B Lowery. A profile cone penetrometer for mapping soil horizons. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 2136-2139, 2000.
59. AG Kasim, MY Chu, CN Jensen. Field correlation of cone and standard penetra tion tests. J Geotech Eng 112: 368-372, 1986.
60. PU Kurup, GZ Voyiadjis, MT Tumay. Calibration chamber studies of peizocone test in cohesive soils. J Geotech Eng 120: 81-107, 1994.
61. AJ Puppala, YB Acar, MT Tumay. Cone penetration in very weakly cemented sand. J Geotech Eng 121: 589-600, 1995.
62. PD Ayers, JV Perumpral. Moisture and density effect on cone index. Trans ASAE 25: 1169-1172, 1982.
63. AR Quiroga, DE Buschiasso, N Peinemann. Soil compaction is related to manage ment practices in the semi-arid Argentine pampas. Soil Tillage Res 52: 21-28, 1999.
64. B Lowery, RT Schuler. Duration and effects of compaction on soil and plant growth in Wisconsin. Soil Tillage Res 29: 205-210, 1994.
65. S Grunwald, DJ Rooney, K McSweeney, B Lowery. Development of pedotransfer functions for a profile cone penetrometer. Geoderma 100: 25-47, 2001.
66. DG Schulze, JL Nagel, GE Van Scoyoc, TL Henderson, MF Baumgardner, DE Stott. The significance of organic matter in determining soil color. In Soil Color, Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 31, JM Bigham, EJ Ciolkosz, Eds. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1993, pp. 71-90.
67. E VanRanst, M Verloo, A Demeyer, JM Pauwels. Manual for the Soil Chemistry and Fertility Laboratory. University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium, 1999.
68. A Dent, A Young. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation. George Allen & Unwin Publication, Boston, 1981.
69. K Daniel, NK Tripathi, K Honda, E Apisit. Analysis of Spectral Reflectance and Absorption Patterns of Soil Organic Matter. Paper presented at 22nd Asian Con ference on Remote Sensing, Singapore, 2001.
70. HW Siesler, Y Ozaki, S Kawata, HM Heise. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Princi ples, Instruments, Applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
71. JB Reeves, GW McCarty, VB Reever. Mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectros copy for the quantitative analysis of agricultural soils. J Agric Food Chem 49: 766-772, 2001.
72. LJ Janik, RH Merry, JO Skjemstad. Can mid infrared diffuse reflectance analysis replace soil extractions. Aust J Exp Agric 38: 681-696, 1998.
73. KD Shephard, MG Walsh. Development of reflectance spectral libraries for char acterization of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 988-998, 2002.
74. RN Clark. Spectroscopy of rocks and minerals, and principles of spectroscopy. In Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences: Manual of Remote Sensing, Vol 3, N Rencz, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999, pp. 3-52.
75. TM Lillesand, WW Kiefer. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
76. T Udelhoven, C Emmerling, T Jarmer. Quantitative analysis of soil chemical properties with diffuse reflectance spectrometry and partial least-square regres sion: a feasibility study. Plant Soil 251: 319-329, 2003.
77. A Couillard, AJ Turgeon, MO Westerhaus, JS Shenk. Determination of soil sep arates with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 4: 201-212, 1997.
78. L Kooistra, J Wanders, GF Epema, RSEW Leuven, R Wehrens, LMC Buydens. The potential of field spectroscopy for the assessment of sediment properties in river floodplains. Anal Chem Acta 484: 189-200, 2003.
79. RJ Kauth, GS Thomas. The Tasselled Cap: A Graphic Description of Spectral-Temporal Development of Agricultural Crops as Seen by Landsat. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1976.
80. KA Sudduth, JW Hummel. Near infrared spectrophotometry for soil property sensing. In Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Optics in Agriculture and Forestry No. 1836, Bellingham, WA, 1992, pp. 14-25.
81. DR Oetter, WB Cohen, M Berterretche, TK Maiersperger, RE Kennedy. Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multi-seasonal thematic data. Remote Sensing Environ 76: 139-155, 2000.
82. MA Friedl, CE Brodley. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ 61: 399-409, 1997.
83. SA Sader, D Ahl, WS Lio. Accuracy of Landsat-TM and GIS rule-based methods for forest wetland classification in Maine. Remote Sensing Environ 53: 133-144, 1995.
84. GI Metternicht, JA Zinck. Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and con straints. Remote Sensing Environ 85: 1-20, 2003.
85. MK Ridd, J Liu. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing Environ 63: 95-100, 1998.
86. ES Kasischke, KB Smith, LL Bourgeau-Chavez, EA Romanowicz, S Brunzell, CJ Richardson. Effects of seasonal hydrologic patterns in south Florida wetlands on radar backscatter measured from ERS-2 SAR imagery. Remote Sensing Environ J 88: 423-441, 2003.
87. M Pardé, J-P Wigneron, A Chanzy, P Waldteufel, Y Kerr, S Huet. Retrieving surface soil moisture over a wheat field: comparison of different methods. Remote Sensing Environ J 87: 334-344, 2003.
88. S Chabrillat, AFH Goetz, L Krosley, HW Olsen. Use of hyperspectral images in the identification and mapping of expansive clay soils and the role of spatial resolution. Remote Sensing Environ J 82: 431-445, 2002.
89. NA Drake, S Mackin, JJ Settle. Mapping vegetation, soils, and geology in semiarid shrublands using spectral matching and mixture modeling of SWIR AVIRIS imag ery. Remote Sensing Environ J 68: 12-25, 1999.
90. RF Tomlinson. The impact of the transition from analogue to digital cartographic representation. Am Cartogr 15: 249-261, 1988.
91. PA Burrough. GIS and geostatistics: essential partners for spatial analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 8: 361-377, 2001.
92. S Grunwald, KR Reddy, S Newman, WF DeBusk. Spatial variability, distribution, and uncertainty assessment of soil phosphorus in a south FL wetland. Environ-metrics J, 15: 811-825, 2004.
93. ZR Peng. An assessment framework of the development strategies of Internet GIS. Environ Planning B Planning Design 26: 117-132, 1999.
94. S Grunwald, KR Reddy, V Mathiyalagan, SA Bloom. Florida's Wetland WebGIS. Paper presented at ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA, July 7-11, 2003.
95. B Plewe. GIS Online: Information Retrieval, Mapping, and the Internet. OnWord Press, Santa Fe, NM, 1997.
96. Z-R Peng, M-H Tsou. Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.
97. V Mathiyalagan, S Grunwald, KR Reddy, SA Bloom. A WebGIS and geodatabase for Florida's wetlands. Comput Electron Agric. 47: 69-75, 2005.
98. AA Roshannejad, W Kainz. Handling identities in spatio-temporal databases. ACSM/ASPRS Annu Convention Exposition Tech Papers 4: 119-126, 1995.
99. T Abraham, JF Roddick. Survey of spatio-temporal databases. Geoinformatica 3: 61-99, 1999.
100. IJ Koeppel, SD Ahlmer. Integrating the Dimension of Time into AM/FM Systems. Paper presented at Proceedings of the AM/FM XVI International Annual Confer ence, Aurora, CO, 1993.
101. DJ Peuquet, N Duan. An Event-Based Spatio-Temporal Data Model (ESTDM) for temporal analysis of geographical data. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9: 7-24, 1995.
102. M Yuan 1997. Modeling semantics, spatial and temporal information in a GIS. In Progress in Trans-Atlantic Geographic Information Research, M Craglia, H Couleclis, Eds. Taylor & Francis, New York, 1997, pp. 334-347.
103. V Ramasundaram, S Grunwald, A Mangeot, NB Comerford, CM Bliss. Develop ment of a virtual field laboratory. J. Comput Educ. 45: 21-34, 2005.
104. K Morris, D Hill, A Moore. Mapping the environment through three-dimensional space and time. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24: 435-450, 2000.
105. Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy, Agricultural Handbook 436. USDA Soil Con servation Service, Washington DC, 1999.
106. OC Spaargaren. Other systems of soil classification. In Handbook of Soil Science, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 2000, pp. 137-174.
107. FAO. FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend, World Soil Resources Report 84. FAO, Rome, 1988.
108. FOF Nachtergaele. The future of the FAO legend and the FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World. In Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference, H Eswaran, T Rice, R Ahrens, BA Stewart, Eds. CRC Press, New York, 2003, pp. 147-156.
109. FAO, ISRIC, ISSS. World Reference Base for Soil Resource, World Soil Resources Report 84. FAO, Rome, 1988.
110. AR Mermut, H Eswaran. Some major developments in soil science since the mid-1960s. Geoderma 100: 403-426, 2001.
111. H Eswaran, T Rice, R Ahrens, BA Stewart. Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference. CRC Press, New York, 2003.
112. JHM Wösten, A Lilly, A Names, CL Bas. Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 90: 169-185, 1999.
113. C Ditzler. Soil Survey and Soil Variability: A Literature Review and Recommen dations. Report presented to the deputy chief of the Natural Resource Conservation Service, Maury Mausbach, December 3, 2003.