Myocardial perfusion after one year of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 104-109

  Fricke, Eva ^a   Eckert, S ^a   Dongas, A ^a   Fricke, H ^a   Preuss, R ^a   Lindner, O ^a   Horstkotte, D ^a   Burchert, W ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angina pectoris; Coronary artery disease; Myocardial blood flow; Palliative care; Positron emission tomography; Spinal cord stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; AMMONIA N 13; ANGIOTENSIN II ANTAGONIST; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; ANTIVITAMIN K; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; DIURETIC AGENT; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GALLIUM 68; GERMANIUM; GLUCOSE; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; INSULIN; NITRATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG UPTAKE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; IMPLANTATION; MALE; OBESITY; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67049113804     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0210     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrell P, Ekre O, Eliasson T et al. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris--long-term results from the ESBY study. Cardiology 2003; 99: 20-24. (Pubitemid 36206631)
2. Ansari S, Chaudhri K, Moutaery K. Neurostimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97: 283-288.
3. Buchser E, Durrer A, Albrecht E. Spinal cord stimulation for the management of refractory angina pectoris. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006; 31: S36-S42.
4. Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54: 522-523.
5. De Landsheere C, Mannheimer C, Habets A et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial perfusion assessed by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1143-1149.
6. Diedrichs H, Zobel C, Theissen P et al. Symptomatic relief precedes improvement of myocardial blood flow in patients under spinal cord stimulation. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6: 7. (Pubitemid 41535316)
7. Dyer MT, Goldsmith KA, Khan SN et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Percutaneous Myocardial Laser Revascularisation in patients with Refractory Angina Pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Trials 2008; 9: 40.
8. Eddicks S, Maier-Hauff K, Schenk M et al. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study. Heart 2007; 93: 585-590. (Pubitemid 46707110)
9. Ekre O, Eliasson T, Norrsell H et al.. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation and coronary artery bypass grafting on quality of life and survival in the ESBY study. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1938-1945. (Pubitemid 35448552)
10. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Punukollu G et al. Treatment of refractory angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol 2005; 101: 1-7. (Pubitemid 40614729)
11. Hautvast RW, Blanksma PK, DeJongste MJ et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 462-467. (Pubitemid 26086633)
12. Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenspire KC et al. Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using 13N-ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 1032-1042. (Pubitemid 20104558)
13. Kendziorra K, Walther C, Foerster M et al. Changes in myocardial perfusion due to physical exercise in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005; 32: 813-819. (Pubitemid 41125424)
14. Kronhaus KD, Lawson WE. Enhanced external counterpulsation is an effective treatment for Syndrome X. Int J Cardiol 2008; DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard. 2008.03.022.
15. Latif OA, Nedeljkovic SS, Stevenson LW. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 533-541. (Pubitemid 32726970)
16. Latif OA, Raj PP. Spinal cord stimulation: a comparison of efficacy versus other novel treatments for refractory angina pectoris. Pain Pract 2001; 1: 36-45.
17. Loh PH, Cleland JG, Louis AA et al. Enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of chronic refractory angina: a long-term follow-up outcome from the International Enhanced External Counterpulsation Patient Registry. Clin Cardiol 2008; 31: 159-164. (Pubitemid 351556481)
18. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson LE et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study. Circulation 1998; 97: 1157-1163. (Pubitemid 28152889)
19. McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD et al. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1048-1053. (Pubitemid 43954933)
20. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-979.
21. Murphy DF, Giles KE. Intractable angina pectoris: management with dorsal column stimulation. Med J Aust 1987; 146: 260. (Pubitemid 17117306)
22. Murphy DF, Giles KE. Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris. Pain 1987; 28: 365-368. (Pubitemid 17025976)
23. Rosenspire KC, Schwaiger M, Mangner TJ et al. Metabolic fate of (13N)ammonia in human and canine blood. J Nucl Med 1990; 31: 163-167. (Pubitemid 20059217)
24. 11C)Acetate as a quantitative perfusion tracer in myocardial PET. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 1174-1182.
25. Yu W, Maru F, Edner M et al. Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit. Coron Artery Dis 2004; 15: 31-37. (Pubitemid 39117997)