Online model-based redesign of experiments for parameter estimation in dynamic systems

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 4415-4427

  Galvanin, Federico ^a   Barolo, Massimiliano ^a   Bezzo, Fabrizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL EFFORT; DYNAMIC EXPERIMENT; DYNAMIC PROCESS; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; FIRST-PRINCIPLES; MODEL PARAMETERS; NUMBER OF SAMPLES; OFFLINE; ONLINE MODELS; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN; OPTIMAL MODEL; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; PROCESS DATA; PROCESS MEASUREMENTS; SEQUENTIAL MODEL;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; METAL ANALYSIS; MOLAR MASS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 67049087140     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie8018356     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brendel, M.; Bonvin, D.; Marquardt, W. Incremental identification of kinetic models for homogeneous reaction systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 5404-5420.
2. Atkinson, A. C; Donev, A. N. Optimum Experiment Designs; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992.
3. Krishnan, S.; Barton, G. W.; Perkins, J. D. Robust parameter estimation in on-line optimization-part I. Methodology and simulated case study. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1992, 16, 545-562.
4. Lazic, Z. R. Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering: Wiley- VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
5. Box, G. E. P.; Lucas, H. L. Design of experiments in non-linear situations. Biometrika. 1959, 46, 77-90.
6. Asprey, S. P.; Macchietto, S. Statistical tools for optimal dynamic model building. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1261-1267.
7. Bauer, I.; Bock, H. G.; Körkel, S.; Schlöder, J. P. Numerical methods for optimum experimental design in DAE systems. J. Comput. Appl. Mathem. 2000, 120, 1-25.
8. Zullo, L., Computer Aided Design of Experiments. An Engineering Approach; The University of London: UK, 1991.
9. Franceschini, G.; Macchietto, S. Validation of a model for biodiesel production through model-based experiment design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 220-232.
10. Reverte, C; Dirion, J. L.; Cabassud, M. Kinetic model identification and parameters estimation from TGA experiments. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2007, 79, 297-305.
11. Galvanin, F.; Barolo, M.; Macchietto, S.; Bezzo, F. Optimal design of clinical tests for the identification of physiological models of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 1989-2002.
12. Joshi, M.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Kremling, A. Exploiting the bootstrap method for quantifying parameter confidence intervals in dynamical systems. Metab. Eng. 2006, 8, 447-553.
13. Mehra, R. K. Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems-Survey and new results. IEEE T. Automat. Cont. 1974, 19, 753-768.
14. Keviczky, L. Design of Experiments for the identification of linear dynamic systems. Technometrics. 1975, 17, 303-8.
15. Lindqvist, K.; Hjalmarsson, H. Identification for control: adaptive input design using convex optimisation. In: Proc. 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Orlando, Florida, USA, 2001.
16. Hjalmarsson, H. Adaptive input design in system identification. In Proc. 44 th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Seville, Spain, 2005.
17. Stigter, J. D.; Vries, D.; Keesman, K. J. On adaptive optimal input design: a bioreactor case study. AIChE J. 2006, 52, 3290-3296.
18. Franceschini, G.; Macchietto, S. Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: State of the art. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 4846-4872.
19. Galvanin, F.; Macchietto, S.; Bezzo, F. Model-based design of parallel experiments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 871-882.
20. Pistikopoulous, E. N. Uncertainty in process design and operations. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19 (S), 553-563.
21. Pukelsheim, F. Optimal Design of Experiments; J. Wiley and Sons: New York, U. S. A., 1993.
22. Zhang, Y.; Edgar, T. F. PCA combined model-based design of experiments (DOE) criteria for differential and algebraic system parameter identification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 7772-7783.
23. Pritchard, D.; Bacon, D. W. Prospects for reducing correlations among parameter estimates in kinetic models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1978, 33, 1539-1543.
24. Franceschini, G.; Macchietto, S. Novel anticorrelation criteria for model based experiment design: Theory and formulations. AIChE J. 2008, 54, 1009-1024.
25. Bard, Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation; Academic Press Inc.: New York, U. S. A., 1974.
26. Körkel, S.; Kostina, E.; Bock, H. G.; Schlöder, J. P. Numerical methods for optimal control problems in design of robust optimal experiments for nonlinear dynamic processes. Opt. Methods Software. 2004, 19, 327-338.
27. Emery, A. F. Using the concept of information to optimally design experiments with uncertain parameters. ASME J. Heat Transfer 2001, 123, 593-600.
28. Panjapornpon, C.; Soroush, M. On-line parameter estimation through dynamic inversion: a real time study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 39, 2503-2507.
29. Ray, W. H. Advanced Process Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, U. S. A., 1980.
30. Camacho, E. F.; Bordons, C., Model PredictiVe Control; Springer- Verlag: London, U. K., 2004.
31. Vassiliadis, V. S.; Sargent, R. W. H.; Pantelides, C. C. Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimizations problems. 1-Problems without path constraints. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2111-2122.
32. Galvanin, F., PhD Project. Progress report; DIPIC, University of Padova: Italy, 2007.
33. Espie, D.; Macchietto, S. The optimal design of dynamic experiments. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 223-229.
34. gPROMS AdVanced User Guide-Rel. 2.3, Process Systems Enterprise Ltd.: London, UK, 2004.
35. Bock, H.; Kostina, E.; Phu, H. X.; Rannacher, R. Modeling, Simulation and optimization of complex processes; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003.
36. Körkel, S.; Bauer, I.; Bock, H. G.; Schlöder, J. P. A sequential approach for nonlinear optimum experimental design in DAE systems. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering, May 26-28, 1999, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Germany, 1999.