Intended changes are not always good, and unintended changes are not always bad-why?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 39-40

  Baertschi, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN TRANSPLANTATION; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; NOTE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BRAIN TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL VALUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 66949170298     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902788710     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ackerman, S. 2006. Hard Science, Hard Choices. New York,NY: Dana Press.
2. Baertschi, B. 2009. La Neuroéthique. Ce Que les Neurosciences Font à Nos Conceptions Morales. Paris, France: La Découverte
3. Coccaro, E. 2004. Session 2: Neuroscience, brain, and behavior VII: Understanding aggressive behavior through neuroscience. Thursday, September 9. In The President's Council on Bioethics. Available at: http://www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/sep04/session2.html (accessed March 14, 2009).
4. Dennett, D. 2003. Freedom Evolves. London, UK: Allen Lane.
5. Engelhardt, H. T. 1986. The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Duggan, P. S., Siegel, A. W., Blass, D. M., et al. 2009. Unintended changes in cognition, mood, and behavior arising from cellbased interventions for neurological conditions: Ethical challenges. American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB Neuroscience) 9(5): 31-36.
7. Parens, E. 2006. Creativity, gratitude, and the enhancement debate. In Neuroethics, ed. J. Illes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.