Testing marginal homogeneity against stochastic order in multivariate ordinal data

Biometrics

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 452-462

  Klingenberg, B ^a   Solari, A ^b   Salmaso, L ^b   Pesarin, F ^b  

^a WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Correlated ordinal observations; Drug safety; Multiple endpoints; Stochastic order

Indexed keywords

SAFETY TESTING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

ADVERSE EVENTS; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; CORRELATED ORDINAL OBSERVATION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DRUG SAFETY; MULTIPLE ENDPOINT; ORDINAL DATA; SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS; STOCHASTIC ORDERINGS; TREATMENT EFFECTS;

TOXICITY;

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; HOMOGENEITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; TESTING METHOD;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EID: 66949168034     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01067.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agresti, A. and Klingenberg, B. (2005). Multivariate tests comparing binomial probabilities, with application to safety studies for drugs. Applied Statistics 54, 691 706. (Pubitemid 41328330)
2. Baird, S. J., Catalano, P. J., Ryan, L. M., and Evans, J. S. (1997). Evaluation of effect profiles: Functional observational battery outcomes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 40, 37 51.
3. Cohen, A. and Sackrowitz, H. (2000). Testing whether treatment is "better" than control with ordered categorical data: Definitions and complete class theorems. Statistics & Decisions 18, 1 25.
4. Cohen, A., Madigan, D., and Sackrowitz, H. (2003). Effective directed tests for models with ordered categorical data. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 45, 285 300. (Pubitemid 37023229)
5. Deming, W. E. and Stephan, E. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected margins are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11, 427 444.
6. Han, K. E., Catalano, P. J., Senchaudhuri, P., and Mehta, C. (2004). Exact analysis of dose response for multiple correlated binary outcomes. Biometrics 87, 241 247.
7. Hirji, K. F. (2006). Exact Analysis of Discrete Data. London : Chapman & Hall/CRC.
8. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65 70.
9. Huang, Y., Xu, H., Calian, V., and Hsu, J. C. (2006). To permute or not to permute. Bioinformatics 22, 2244 2248. (Pubitemid 44390879)
10. Kimeldorf, G., Sampson, A. R., and Whitaker, L. R. (1992). Min and max scoring for two-sample ordinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 60, 216 224.
11. Klingenberg, B. and Agresti, A. (2006). Multivariate extensions of McNemar's test. Biometrics 62, 921 928.
12. Lagakos, S. W., Wessen, B. J., and Zelen, M. (1986). An analysis of contaminated well water and health effects in Woburn, Massachusetts. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 583 596.
13. Lancaster, H. O. (1961). The combination of probabilities: An application to orthonormal functions. Australian Journal of Statistics 3, 20 33.
14. Logan, B. R. and Tamhane, A. C. (2004). On O'Brien's OLS and GLS tests for multiple endpoints. In Recent Developments in Multiple Comparison Procedures, Y. Benjamini, F. Bretz, and S. Sarkar (eds Vol. 47, 76 88. IMS Lecture Notes, Monograph Series. Beachwood, Ohio : IMS.
15. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63, 655 660.
16. Marshall, A. and Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. New York : Academic Press.
17. Molenberghs, G. and Ryan, L. M. (1999). An exponential family model for clustered multivariate binary data. Environmetrics 10, 279 300. (Pubitemid 29319458)
18. Moser, V. C. (1989). Screening approaches to a neurotoxicity: A functional observational battery. Journal of the American College of Toxicology 8, 85 93.
19. Moser, V. C., Cheek, B. M., and MacPhail, R. C. (1995). A multidisciplinary approach to toxicological screening. III. Neurobehavioral toxicity. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 45, 173 210.
20. Müller, A. (2001). Stochastic ordering of multivariate normal distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 53, 567 575. (Pubitemid 33617903)
21. O'Brien, P. C. (1984). Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics 40, 1079 1087.
22. Pocock, S. J., Geller, N. L., and Tsiatis, A. A. (1987). The analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials. Biometrics 43, 487 498. (Pubitemid 18045135)
23. Pollard, K. S. and van der Laan, M. J. (2004). Choice of a null distribution in resampling-based multiple testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 125, 85 100. (Pubitemid 39072455)
24. Silvapulle, J. S. and Sen, P. K. (2005). Constrained Statistical Inference. Inequality, Order, and Shape Restictions. Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons.
25. Troendle, J. F. (2005). Multiple comparisons between two groups on multiple Bernoulli outcomes while accounting for covariates. Statistics in Medicine 24, 3581 3591. (Pubitemid 41700844)
26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1985). Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines. Final Rules. 40 CFR Part 798, Subpart 798.6050. FR 50(188):39458-39460.
27. Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. (1989). P value adjustments for multiple tests in multivariate binomial models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 780 786.
28. Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-Based Multiple Testing. New York : John Wiley & Sons.