In-field and soil-related factors that affect the presence and prediction of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations collected from indiana soybean fields

Weed Science

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 281-289

  Davis, Vince M ^a   Gibson, Kevin D ^a   Mock, Valerie A ^a   Johnson, William G ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CART; Decision trees; Herbicide resistance; Weed survey

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SURVEY; CLASSIFICATION; GLYPHOSATE; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOYBEAN; WEED;

INDIANA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CONYZA; CONYZA CANADENSIS; GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 66949156774     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-08-131.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnes, J., B. Johnson, K. Gibson, and S. Weller. 2004. Crop rotation and tillage system influence late-season incidence of giant ragweed and horseweed in Indiana soybean. Crop Manag. doi:10.1094/CM-2004-0923-02-BR. Published online: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org. Accessed: February, 2008.
2. Beckie, H. J., L. M. Hall, S. Meers, J. J. Laslo, and F. C. Stevenson. 2004. Management practices influencing herbicide resistance in wild oat. Weed Technol. 18:853-859.
3. Beckie, H. J., I. M. Heap, R. J. Smeda, and L. M. Hall. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technol. 14:428-445.
4. Bhowmik, P. C. and M. M. Bekech. 1993. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed production, emergence and distribution in no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays). Agronomy (Trends in Agric. Sci.) 1:67-71.
5. Bradley, K. W., B. Johnson, R. Smeda, and C. Boerboom. 2007. Integrated Pest Management: Practical Weed Science for the Field Scout, Corn and Soybean. Univ. MO Extension IPM1007. Webpage: http://extension.missouri.edu/ explore/agguides/pests/ipm1007.htm. Accessed: May, 2008.
6. Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. The Wadsworth Statistics/Probability Series. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7. Brown, S. M. and T. Whitwell. 1988. Influence of tillage on horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol. 2:269-270.
8. Bruce, J. A. and J. J. Kells. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in notillage soybean (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:642-547.
9. Buhler, D. D. and M.D.K. Owen. 1997. Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 45:98-101.
10. Dauer, J. T., D. A. Mortensen, and R. Humston. 2006. Controlled experiments to predict horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dispersal distances. Weed Sci. 54:484-489.
11. Davis, V. M., K. D. Gibson, T. T. Bauman, S. C. Weller, and W. G. Johnson. 2007. Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed population dynamics and crop yield. Weed Sci. 55:508-516.
12. Davis, V. M., K. D. Gibson, and W. G. Johnson. 2008. A field survey to determine distribution and frequency of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Indiana. Weed Technol. 22:331-338.
13. Davis, V. M. and W. G. Johnson. 2008. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity in no-till soybean. Weed Sci. 56:231-236.
14. De'ath, G. and K. E. Fabricius. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178-3192.
15. Dinelli, G., I. Marotti, A. Bonetti, M. Minelli, P. Catizone, and J. Barnes. 2006. Physiological and molecular insight on the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in Conyza canadensis (L.) Croq. biotypes. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 86:30-41.
16. Franzmeier, D. P., G. C. Steinhardt, and B. D. Lee. 2001. Indiana Soils: Evaluation and Conservation. Purdue Cooperative Extension Service ID-72. Gibson, K. D., W. G. Johnson, and D. E. Hillger. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:1065-1070.
17. Harrison, S. K., E. E. Regnier, J. T. Schmoll, and J. M. Harrison. 2007. Seed size and burial effects on giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) emergence and seed demise. Weed Sci. 55:16-22.
18. Heap, I. M. 2008. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Web Page: http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: March 2008.
19. Johnson, B., J. Barnes, K. Gibson, and S. Weller. 2004. Late-season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Crop Manag. doi:10.1094/CM-2004-0923-01-BR. Published online: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org. Accessed: February, 2008.
20. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520-526.
21. Main, C. L., L. E. Steckel, R. M. Hayes, and T. C. Mueller. 2006. Biotic and abiotic factors influence horseweed emergence. Weed Sci. 54:1101-1105.
22. Moseley, C. M. and E. S. Hagood, Jr. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in full-season no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:814-818.
23. Nandula, V. K., T. W. Eubank, D. H. Poston, C. H. Koger, and K. N. Reddy. 2006. Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 54:898-902.
24. Owen, M.D.K. and I. A. Zelaya. 2005. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manage. Sci. 61:301-311.
25. Powles, S. B. and C. Preston. 2006. Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: biochemical and genetic basis of resistance. Weed Technol. 20:282-289.
26. Regehr, D. L. and F. A. Bazzaz. 1979. The population dynamics of Erigeron canadensis, a successional winter annual. J. Ecol. 67:923-933.
27. Sankula, S. 2006.Quantification of the impacts on U.S. agriculture of biotechnologyderived crops planted in 2005. National Center for Food and Agriculture Policy, www.ncfap.org/whatwedo/pdf/2005biotecimpacts-finalversion. pdf. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy.
28. Shields, E. J., J. T. Dauer, M. J. VanGessel, and G. Neumann. 2006. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci. 54:1063-1067.
29. Smeda, R. J. and J. M. Pollard. 2005. Documenting the extent of glyphosateresistant common ragweed. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:152.
30. USDA-ERS. 2008. Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the US: Soybean varieties. Published online. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/biotechcrops/. Washington, DC: USDA-ERS, Accessed: March, 2008.
31. VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703-705.
32. VanGessel, M. J., A. O. Ayeni, and B. A. Majek. 2001. Glyphosate in full season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:714-724.
33. Vayssie'res, M. P., R. E. Plant, and B. H. Allen-Diaz. 2000. Classification trees: an alternative non-parametic approach for predicting species distributions. J. Veg. Sci. 11:679-694.
34. Weaver, S. E. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:867-875.
35. Westhoven, A. M., V. M. Davis, K. D. Gibson, S. C. Weller, and W. G. Johnson. 2008. Field presence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) biotypes with elevated tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Technol. 22:544-548.
36. Wiles, L. and M. Brodahl. 2004. Exploratory data analysis to identify factors influencing spatial distributions of weed seed banks. Weed Sci. 52:936-947.
37. Zelaya, I. A., M.D.K. Owen, and M. J. VanGessel. 2004. Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:58-70.
38. Zhang, J., M. L. Salas, N. R. Jordan, and S. C. Weller. 1999. Biorational approaches to managing Datura stramonium. Weed Sci. 47:750-756.