Fasting plasma glucose reference values among young Japanese women requiring 75g oral tolerance tests

Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 15-20

  Koike, Yoko ^a   Ogushi, Yoichi ^a   Jin, Dacheng ^a   Sato, Haruhiro ^a   Yamada, Toshio ^b  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b The Health Promotion Foundation of Koriyama   (Japan)

Author keywords

75g oral glucose tolerance tests; Fasting plasma glucose; ROC curve; Young Japanese women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; HUMAN; INSULIN RESISTANCE; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; JAPANESE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FASTING; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66949146226     PISSN: 03850005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. The Commission Report on the Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus 1991; 42: 385-401.
2. The Expert Committee on The Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3160-3167.
3. Forouhi NG, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Dekker J, Glumer C, Qiao Q, et al. The threshold for diagnosing impaired fasting glucose: a position statement by the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 822-827.
4. Edward A, Sasse BT, Doumas PD, Eckfeldt SA, Evans GA, Graham GL, et al. How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline-Second Edition. Wayne: NCCLS, 2000; 20: C28-A2.
5. Ogushi Y, Shibata T, Kanno T, Ogawa T. The Reference Interval of Examination Items by Gender and Age-Japanese Gender Differences Clarified through 700,000 People's Health Examination Checkup Data; How are the Examination Items Selected. Gender Differences and Medicine, 2004; 1: 63-66.
6. Japan Diabetes Society Incorporated Association. Guide to Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus 2006-2007. Tokyo: Bunkodo Company, Inc, 2006.
7. National diabetes data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-1057.
8. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus: Second Report. Geneva: World Health Org, 1980.
9. Australian Centre for Diabetes Strategies. National evidence based guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. [article online] 2001. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp86syn.htm Accessed 12 September 2006.
10. Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Alberti KG. Point: Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Case for the new American Diabetes Association Criteria. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1170-1172.
11. American Diabetes Association. Screening for Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 11-14.
12. Borch-Johnsen K, Colagiuri S, Balkau B, Glumer C, Carstensen B, Ramachandran A, et al. Creating a pandemic of prediabetes the proposed new diagnostic criteria for impaired fasting glycemia. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 1396-1402.