Pay-for-performance in nursing homes

Health Care Financing Review

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1-13

  Briesacher, Becky A ^a,b   Field, Terry S ^a   Baril, Joann ^a   Gurwitz, Jerry H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL FEE; NURSING HOME; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; REIMBURSEMENT;

NURSING HOMES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 66849119099     PISSN: 01958631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agency for Health Care Administration: Title XIX Long-Term Care Reimbursement Plan, Version XXX, Effective Date: July 1, 2006. 2006. Internet address: http://www.fdhc.state.fl.us/medicaid/cost-reim/pdf/long-term- care-v33.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
2. Carter, B. J.: Characteristics Associated with Performance in Texas Medicaid Nursing Facilities: Findings from the FY2001 Performance-based Add-On (PBAO) Payment Program. 2002. Internet address: http://qmweb.dads.state.tx. us/Reports/PBAO-2002.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid: Nursing Home Value-Based Purchasing Demonstration. 2008. Internet address: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ Demo-ProjectsEvalRpts/downloads/NHP4P-Summary.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: 2007 Action Plan for (Further Improvement of) Nursing Home Quality. 2006. Internet address: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/2007ActionPlan.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
5. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press. Washington, DC. 2001.
6. Doshi, J. A., Shaffer, T., and Briesacher, B.: National Estimates of Medication Use in Nursing Homes: Findings from the 1997 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and the 1996 Medical Expenditure Survey. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 53(3): 438-443, March 2005.
7. Felt-Lisk, S., Gimm, G., and Peterson, S.: Making Pay-For-Performance Work In Medicaid. Web Exclusive. Health Affairs w516-w527, June 26, 2007. Internet address: http://www.healthaffairs.org(Accessed 2009.)
8. Georgia Department of Community Health: Department of Community Health/Georgia Nursing Home Incentive Model. 2007a. Internet address: http://www.ghca.info/DCH.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
9. Georgia Department of Community Health: Georgia Medicaid Takes Next Step In Nursing Home Quality Initiative. 2007b. Internet address: http://dch.georgia.gov/vgn/images/portal/cit-1210/52/28/80446139Press-Release- Nursing-Home-Quality-Initiative.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
10. Georgia Department of Community Health: A Snapshot of Georgia Medicaid: Nursing Home Quality Initiative. 2007c. Internet address: http://dch.georgia.gov/vgn/images/portal/cit-1210/60/52/70650176Medicaid-Fact- FYfin08Sheet.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
11. Geron, S. M.: Regulating the Behavior of Nursing Homes Through Positive Incentives: An Analysis of Illinois' Quality Incentive Program (QUIP). The Gerontologist 31(3): 292-301, June 1991.
12. Gilmore, A. S., Zhao, Y., Kang, N., et al.: Patient Outcomes and Evidence-Based Medicine in a Preferred Provider Organization Setting: A Six-Year Evaluation of a Physician Pay-for-Performance Program. Health Services Research 42(6 Pt 1): 2140-2159, December 2007.
13. Glickman, S., Ou, F.-S., Delong, E.R., et al: Pay for Performance, Quality of Care, and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction. JAMA 297(21): 2373-2380, 2007.
14. Held, R.: Rural Health Advisory Committee, Nursing Facility Pay for Performance. 2007. Internet address: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/ orhpc/rhac/minutes/2007/032007.html (Accessed 2009.)
15. Intrator, O., Grabowski, D.C., and Zinn, J.: Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents: The Effects of States' Medicaid Payment and Bed-Hold Policies. Health Services Research 42(4): 1651-1671, 2007.
16. Jones, B. J. and Meiners, M.R.: Nursing Home Discharges: The Results of an Incentive Reimbursement Experiment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment. DHSS Publication No. (PHS) 86-3399. Washington, DC. 1986.
17. Kane, R., Arling, G. A., and Mueller, C: A Quality-Based Payment Strategy for Nursing Home Care in Minnesota. The Gerontologist 47(1): 108-115, February 2007.
18. Kansas Department on Aging: A Kansas Case Study: Culture Change and the Nursing Facility Quality and Efficiency Outcomes Incentive Factor. 2007. Internet address: http://www.agingkansas.org/CultureChange/PEAK/peakStudyhtm (Accessed 2009.)
19. Kuhmerker, K and Hartman, T: Pay-for-Performance in State Medicaid Programs: A Survey of State Medicaid Directors and Programs. 2007. Internet address: http://commonwealthfund.org/publications/publi-cations.-showhtm?doc-id= 472891 (Accessed 2009.)
20. Minnesota Department of Human Services: Nursing Facility Rates and Policy Division, Provider Information, Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payments. 2006. Internet address: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/ idcplg?IdcService=GET-DYNAMIC-CONVERSION&RevisionSel ectionMethod= LatestReleased&dDocName=dhsl6-136314 (Accessed 2009.)
21. Norton, E. C.: Incentive Regulation of Nursing Homes. Journal of Health Economics 11(2): 105-128, 1992.
22. Nursing Facility Rates and Policy Division: Value-Based Reimbursement: A Proposal for a New Nursing Facility Reimbursement System. 2004. Internet address: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/aging/documents/pub/dhs-id- 020477.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
23. Nursing Facility Rates and Policy Division: New Rate Setting System for Nursing Facilities: Recommendations to the Minnesota Legislature. 2006. Internet address: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET- FILE&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&Rendition= Primary&allowInterrupt=l&noSaveAs=1&dDocName=dhs-id-057157 (Accessed 2009.)
24. Office of Policy and Research: 1999 Sunset Review: Quality of Care Incentive Payment Program Advisory Committee. 1999. Internet address: http://www.dora.state.co.us/opr/archive/99advisorycommitteereport.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
25. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services: Application to Participate in the Center For Health Care Strategies, Inc. Pay-For-Performance Purchasing Institute Initiative. 2006. Internet address: http://jfs.ohio.gov/ohp/bcps/ OhMedAdvComm/2006/MCAC-WEB-Ohio-P4P-Proposal081406.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
26. Oklahoma Health Care Authority: Focuson Excellence' to Base Nursing Home Pay on Performance. News Release. 2007. Internet address: http://www.ohca.state.ok.us/about.aspx?id=2947 (Accessed 2009.)
27. Petersen, L., Woodard, L.D., Urech, T., et al.: Does Pay-For-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care? Annals of Internal Medicine 145(4): 265-272, 2006.
28. Rosenthal, M. B. and Camillus, J.: How Four Purchasers Designed and Implemented Quality-Based Purchasing Activities - Lessons From the Field. 2007. Internet address: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/qbp-lessons.htm (Accessed 2009.)
29. Rosenthal, M. B. and Frank, R.G.:What is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care? Medical Care Research and Review 63 (2): 135-154, 2005.
30. Rosenthal, M. B. and Frank, R.G.: What is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care? Medical Care Research and Review 63(2): 135-157, 2006.
31. Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R.G., Zhonge, L., et al.: Early Experience with Pay-for-Performance: From Concept to Practice. JAMA 294(14):1788-1793, 2005.
32. Trisolini, M., Pope, G., Kautter, J., et al.: Medicare Physician Group Practices: Innovations in Quality and Efficiency. December 2006. Internet address: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr-doc/971-Trisolini-Medicare- physician-group-practices-i.pdf (Accessed 2009.)
33. U. S. Government Accountability Office: Nursing Home Reform: Continued Attention Is Needed to Improve Quality of Care in Small but Significant Share of Homes. Testimony Before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC. 2007.
34. Weissert, W G., Scanlon, WJ., Wan, T., et al: Care for the Chronically 111: Nursing Home Incentive Payment Experience. Health Care Financing Review 5(2): 41-49,1983.
35. White, A., Hurd, D. Moore, T., et al.: Quality Monitoring for Medicare Global Payment Demonstrations: Nursing Home Quality-Based Purchasing Demonstration. Abt Associates Inc. Cambridge, MA. 2006.
36. Willemain, T. R.: Survey-Based Indices for Nursing Home Quality Incentive Reimbursement. Health Care Financing Review 4(3): 83-90,1983.