Magnetic resonance imaging prediction of an involved surgical resection margin in low rectal cancer

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 632-639

  Salerno, Gisella V ^a   Daniels, Ian R ^a   Moran, Brendan J ^a   Heald, R J ^a   Thomas, Karen ^b   Brown, Gina ^b,c  

^a NORTH HAMPSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abdominoperineal excision surgery; Magnetic resonance imaging stage; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR REGRESSION; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ANAL CANAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RECTUM TUMOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 66849091422     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0a37e     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 2005;242:74Y82.
2. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9257Y64.
3. Faerden AE, Naimy N, Wiik P, et al. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: difference in outcome for low and high rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2224Y31.
4. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN. Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 2004;91:210Y6.
5. Dehni N, McFadden N, McNamara DA, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Oncologic results following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:867Y74.
6. Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:127Y31.
7. Nicholls RJ, Mason AY, Morson BC, Dixon AK, Fry IK. The clinical staging of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1982;69:404Y9.
8. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996Y9.
9. Durdey P, Williams NS. The effect of malignant and inflammatory fixation of rectal carcinoma on prognosis after rectal excision. Br J Surg 1984;71:787Y90.
10. MERCURY Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 2006;333:779.
11. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2003;90:355Y64.
12. Salerno G, Daniels I, Heald RJ, Brown G, Moran BJ. Management and imaging of low rectal carcinoma. Surg Oncol 2004;13:55Y61.
13. Brown G, Daniels IR. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005; 165:58Y74.
14. Vecchio FM, Valentini V, Minsky BD, et al. The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:752Y60.
15. Heald RJ. The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 1988;81:503Y8.
16. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1729Y34.
17. Boyle KMFP, Sagar PM, Burke D. The relationship between mesorectal morphology and gender in patients with primary rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Surg 2004;30:1020.
18. Chan CL, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Renwick AA, Dent OF. Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour. Br J Surg 2006;93:105Y12.
19. Daniels IR, Strassburg J, Moran BJ. The need for future surgical low rectal cancer studies. Colorectal Dis 2006;8(Suppl 3): 25Y9.
20. Vanagunas A, Lin DE, Stryker SJ. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:109Y12.