The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Guldberg, Trine Lignell ^a   Lauritzen, Torsten ^a   Kristensen, Jette Kolding ^a   Vedsted, Peter ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; CHOLESTEROL; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INFLUENZA VACCINE; PNEUMOCOCCUS VACCINE;

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA BASE; DIABETES CONTROL; EMBASE; EYE EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; FOOT; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; MEDLINE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMOCOCCAL INFECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 66749169295     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-30     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. H Heathfield D Pitty R Hanka, BMJ 1998 316 1959 1961 9641938 (Pubitemid 28287147)
2. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. K Thiru A Hassey F Sullivan, BMJ 2003 326 1070 12750210 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070
3. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. G Jamtvedt JM Young DT Kristoffersen MA Thomson O'Brien AD Oxman, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 2 CD000259 12917891
4. Diabetes prevalence and quality of diabetes care among Lebanese or Turkish immigrants compared to a native Danish population. JK Kristensen JF Bak I Wittrup T Lauritzen, Primary Care Diabetes 2007 1 159 165 10.1016/j.pcd.2007. 07.007 18632038
5. Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. JW Dexheimer TR Talbot DL Sanders ST Rosenbloom D Aronsky, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008 15 311 320 18308989 10.1197/jamia.M2555
6. DIRAC Course of Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis. PC Götzsche, 2007 http://www.diracforsk.dk
7. An Endocrinologist-Supported Intervention Aimed at Providers Improves Diabetes Management in a Primary Care Site: Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) 7. LS Phillips DC Ziemer JP Doyle CS Barnes P Kolm WT Branch JM Caudle CB Cook VG Dunbar IM El-Kebbi, Diabetes Care 2005 28 2352 2360 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2352 16186262
8. Multifaceted support to improve clinical decision making in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial in general practice. BD Frijling CM Lobo ME Hulscher RP Akkermans JC Braspenning A Prins JC van der Wouden RP Grol, Diabet Med 2002 19 836 842 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00810.x 12358871
9. Development and evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus. DF Lobach WE Hammond, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994 787 791 7950032
10. A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines. DS Nilasena MJ Lincoln, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995 640 645 8563365
11. Patients and Computers as Reminders to Screen for Diabetes in Family Practice. Randomized-Controlled Trial. T Kenealy B Arroll KJ Petrie, Journal of General Internal Medicine 2005 20 916 921 16191138 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005. 0197.x
12. Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. NF Olivarius H Beck-Nielsen AH Andreasen M Horder PA Pedersen, BMJ 2001 323 970 975 11679387 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.970 (Pubitemid 33016046)
13. A Practical Randomized Trial to Improve Diabetes Care. RE Glasgow PA Nutting DK King CC Nelson G Cutter B Gaglio AK Rahm H Whitesides H Amthauer, Journal of General Internal Medicine 2004 19 1167 1174 15610326 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30425.x
14. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. TD Sequist TK Gandhi AS Karson JM Fiskio D Bugbee M Sperling EF Cook EJ Orav DG Fairchild DW Bates, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005 12 431 437 15802479 10.1197/jamia.M1788
15. Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of diabetes mellitus in general practice. Evaluation of effort, process, and patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based decision support system. I Hetlevik J Holmen O Kruger P Kristensen H Iversen K Furuseth, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000 16 210 227 10.1017/S0266462300161185 10815366
16. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. CI Kiefe JJ Allison OD Williams SD Person MT Weaver NW Weissman, JAMA 2001 285 2871 2879 10.1001/jama.285.22.2871 11401608 (Pubitemid 32537351)
17. Computerized Decision Support Based on a Clinical Practice Guideline Improves Compliance with Care Standards. MPMD Lobach P Hammond, The American Journal of Medicine 1997 102 89 98 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00382-8 9209205
18. The dilemma of patient responsibility for lifestyle change: Perceptions among primary care physicians and nurses. P Jallinoja P Absetz R Kuronen A Nissinen M Talja A Uutela K Patja, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2007 25 244 249 10.1080/02813430701691778 17934984
19. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. D Moher P Fortin A Jadad P Jüni T Klassen J Le Lorier A Liberati K Linde A Penna, Lancet 1996 347 8998 363 6 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90538-3 8598702
20. Use of guidelines in primary care practitioners' perspectives. C Langley A Faulkner C Watkins S Gray I Harvey, Fam Pract 1998 15 105 111 10.1093/fampra/15.2.105 9613476
21. Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. TK Gandhi TD Sequist EG Poon AS Karson H Murff DG Fairchild GJ Kuperman DW Bates, AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003 848 14728353
22. Designing medical informatics research and library resource projects to increase what is learned. WW Stead RB Haynes S Fuller CP Friedman LE Travis JR Beck CH Fenichel B Chandrasekaran BG Buchanan EE Abola, J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994 1 28 33 7719785
23. [Quality indicators of type 2-diabetes monitoring during 20002005]. JK Kristensen T Lauritzen, Ugeskr Laeger 2009 171 130 134 19174023
24. Outcomes of audit-enhanced monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes. WJ de Grauw WH van Gerwen EH van de Lisdonk HJ van den Hoogen WJ van den Bosch WC van, J Fam Pract 2002 51 459 464 12019056 (Pubitemid 34493476)
25. Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands and the United States: a comparison of two quality improvement programs. GD Valk CM Renders DM Kriegsman KM Newton JW Twisk JT van Eijk WG van der EH Wagner, Health Serv Res 2004 39 709 725 15230924 10.1111/j.1475-6773. 2004.00254.x (Pubitemid 38924675)