Graduates' Work: Implications of Organizational Change for the Development of Student Attributes

Industry and Higher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 287-296

  Harvey, Lee ^a   Geall, Vicki ^a   Moon, Sue ^a  

^a BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66749124766     PISSN: 09504222     EISSN: 20436858     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/095042229701100504     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. The research involved 258 in-depth interviews with respondents in 91 organizations, both large and small, public and private sector. 84 respondents were strategic managers, 55 line managers, 84 recent graduates, and 35 non-graduates doing similar jobs to the graduates. See Harvey L., Moon S., Geall V., with Bower R., Graduates' Work: Organizational Change and Students' Attributes, Centre for Research into Quality, University of Central England and Association of Graduate Recruiters, Birmingham, 1997.
2. Even where programmes of study provide students with opportunities for teamworking, assessment regimes frequently encourage the identification of individual contribution. The culture in higher education is one of individual success and failure, reflected in degree classification, and teamworking in an academic context often exhibits an element of artificiality. There is a need to explore more meaningful ways of encouraging and rewarding group working as a process. For most students, a placement experience provides the only real opportunity to develop meaningful teamworking skills.
3. Are Managers Under Stress?, Institute of Management, London, 1996.
4. Classics in the Market Place: An Independent Research Study on Attitudes to the Employment of Classics Graduates, Council of University Classical Departments, Department of Classics, University of Exeter, 1990.
5. Harvey L., with Green D., Employer Satisfaction, QHE, Birmingham, 1994.
6. For example: Greenwood R.G., Edge A.G., Hodgetts M., ‘How managers rank the characteristics expected of business graduates’, Business Education, Vol 8, No 3 1987, pp 30–34; Allen M.J., Scrams D.J., ‘Careers of undergraduate psychology alumni’, paper presented to the 99th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, 16–20 August 1991; Banta T., ‘Critique of a method for surveying employers', paper presented to the 31 st Association for Institutional Research (AIR) Annual Forum, San Francisco, CA, 26–29 May 1991; National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET), Skills Required of Graduates: One Test of Quality in Australian Higher Education, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1992 (also referred to as Skills Sought by Employers of Graduates on front cover of published report); Binks M., Grant A., Exley K., ‘Assessing the output of institutions of higher education: A pilot study’, in Harvey L., ed, Proceedings of the Second QHE Quality Assessment Seminar, 16–17 December, 1993, Birmingham, QHE, Birmingham, 1994, pp 18–28; Educating for Excellence: Business—Higher Education Round Table 1992 Education Surveys, Business—Higher Education Round Table, Camberwell, Victoria, 1992.
7. Quibble Z.K., ‘Writing competences needed by business employees’, Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, Vol 33, No 1, 1991 pp 35–51; James M.L., ‘Essential topics and subtopics of business communication: Are we teaching what employers want?’, Business Education Forum, Vol 46, No 4 1992, pp 8–10; Harvey with Green, , Ref 5.
8. Harvey L, Knight P.T., Transforming Higher Education, Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) and Open University Press, Buckingham, 1996.
9. Graduate Standards Programme, Higher Education Quality Council, London, 1996.