Communicating domain knowledge in executable acceptance test driven development

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 31 LNBIP, Issue , 2009, Pages 23-32

  Park, Shelly ^a   Maurer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

domain knowledge; Executable acceptance test driven development; knowledge management; requirements; ubiquitous language

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LINGUISTICS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TESTING;

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EXECUTABLE ACCEPTANCE TEST DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; EXECUTABLE ACCEPTANCE TESTING; HUMAN ASPECTS; QUALITATIVE DATA; REQUIREMENTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION; UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 66749112887     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01853-4_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
2. Jeffries, R.: What is XP?, http://xprogramming.com/xpmag/ acsFirstAcceptanceTest.htm
3. Fowler, M.: Specification by Example
4. http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/SpecificationByExample.html
5. Kaner, C.: Cem Kaner on Scenario Testing: The Power of 'What-If' and Nine Ways to Fuel Your Imagination. Better Software 5(5), 16-22 (2003)
6. Evans, E.: Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addi-son-Wesley, Reading (2003)
7. CGI, http://www.cgi.com
8. Fit, http://fit.c2.com
9. FitLibrary, http://sourceforge.net/projects/fitlibrary
10. Fitnesse, http://fitnesse.org
11. Greenpepper, http://www.greenpeppersoftware.com/
12. Melnik, G., Maurer, F.: The Practice of Specifying Requirements Using Executable Acceptance Tests in Computer Science Courses. In: Proc. of 20th OOPSLA 2005, San Diego, USA, October 16-20, 2008 (2005)
13. Read, K., Melnik, G., Maurer, F.: Student Experiences with Executable Acceptance Testing. In: Proc. of Agile Conference 2005, July 24-29, pp. 312-317. IEEE Press, Los Alami-tos (2005)
14. Sauvé, J.P., Neto, O.L.: Teaching software development with ATDD and EasyAccept. In: Proc. of SIGCSE tech. symp. on CPSC Education, Portland, USA, pp. 542-546 (2008)
15. Ricca, F., Penta, M., Torchiano, M., Tonella, P., Ceccato, M., Visaggio, C.: Are Fit tables really talking?: A series of experiments to understand whether fit tables are useful during evolution tasks. In: Proc. of the 30th ICSE 2008, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 361-370 (2008)
16. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)
17. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.: Software Metrics: A rigorous and practical approach, 2nd edn. PWS Publishing Company (1996)
18. Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Metrics. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)
19. Grewal, H., Maurer, F.: Scaling Agile Methodologies for Developing a Production Accounting System for the Oil & Gas Industry. In: Proc. of Agile (2007)
20. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)
21. Jira, http://www.jira.com/
22. Energy Resources Conservation Board, http://www.ercb.ca/
23. Melnik, G.: Empirical Analysis of Executable Acceptance Test Driven Development, Ph.D Thesis, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science (August 2007)
24. Melnik, G., Maurer, F., Chiasson, M.: Executable acceptance tests for communicating business requirements: customer perspective. In: Agile 2006, Minneapolis, MN (2006)