Corrective processes in grasping after perturbations of object size

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253-273

  Hesse, Constanze ^a,b   Franz, Volker ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feedback; Feedforward; Grasping; Kinematics; Online control; Perturbation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE HAND COORDINATION; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66749092110     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.41.3.253-273     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Beggs, W. D., & Howarth, C. I. (1972). The accuracy of aiming at a target. Some further evidence for a theory of intermittent control. Acta Psychologica, 36, 171-177.
2. Bennett, K. M., & Castiello, U. (1995). Reorganization of prehension components following perturbation of object size. Psychology and Aging, 10, 204-214.
3. Berthier, N. E., Clifton, R. K., Gullapalli, V. , McCall, D. D., & Robin, D. J. (1996). Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 187-197.
4. Bock, O., & Jüngling, S. (1999). Reprogramming of grip aperture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 61-66.
5. Brainard, D. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
6. Carlton, L. (1981). Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1019-1030.
7. Castiello, U., Bennett, K., & Chambers, H. (1998). Reach to grasp: The response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 31-40.
8. Castiello, U., Bennett, K., & Stelmach, G. (1993). Reach to grasp: The natural response to perturbation of object size. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 163-178.
9. Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365-401.
10. Churchill, A., Hopkins, B., Ronnqvist, L., & Vogt, S. (2000). Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 81-89.
11. Connolly, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 281-286.
12. Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 563-567.
13. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows
14. feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
15. Desmurget, M., Gréa, H., Grethe, J., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G., & Grafton, S. T. (2001). Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2919-2928.
16. Dubrowski, A., Bock, O., Carnahan, H., & Jüngling, S. (2002). The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 365-371.
17. Franz, V. H., (2004). The OptotrakToolbox [Computer software]. Ontario, Canada: Northern Digital Inc. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www.allpsych. uni-giessen.de/vf/Optotrak-Toolbox
18. Franz, V. H., Scharnowski, F., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2005). Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant, not dynamic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1359-1378.
19. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Scarpa, M., & Castiello, U. (1992). Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: Effects of visual perturbation. Behavioural Brain Research, 47(1), 71-82.
20. Georgopoulos, A. P., Kalaska, J. F., & Massey, J. T. (1981). Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: Effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 725-743.
21. Glover, S., Miall, R. C., & Rushworth, M. F. (2005). Parietal rTMS disrupts the initiation but not the execution of on-line adjustments to a perturbation of object size. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 124-136.
22. Goodale, M. A., Pélisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986, April 24). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
23. Gréa, H., Pisella, L., Rossetti, Y. , Desmurget, M., Tilikete, C., Grafton, S., et al. (2002). A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2471-2480.
24. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95-112.
25. Heath, M., Hodges, N. J., Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1998). On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale, 52, 163-173.
26. Hesse, C., & Franz, V. H. (in press). Memory mechanisms in grasping. Neuropsychologia.
27. Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
28. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 153-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
30. Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion In Neurobiology, 9, 718-727.
31. Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155-158.
32. Komilis, E., Pélisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1993). Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 299-308.
33. Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Athenes, S. (1990). Functional relationships between grasp and transport component in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149-176.
34. Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., MacKenzie, C. L., & Marteniuk, R. G. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: Part 2. The effects of changing object size. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 407-420.
35. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Jeannerod, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: Part 1. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
36. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psy-chophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
37. Pisella, L., Gréa, H., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., Desmurget, M., Rode, G., et al. (2000). An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 729-736.
38. Plamondon, R. (1995a). A kinematic theory of rapid human movements. Part II: Movement time and control. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 309-320.
39. Plamondon, R. (1995b). A kinematic theory of rapid human movements. Part I: Movement representation and generation. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 295-307.
40. Prablanc, C., & Martin, O. (1992). Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 455-469.
41. Prablanc, C., Pélisson, D., & Goodale, M. A. (1986). Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 293-302.
42. Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Meunier, M., & Boussaoud, D. (2006). Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: Effects of perturbation of object size and location. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 182-193.
43. Santello, M., Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F. (2002). Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1426-1435.
44. Saunders, J., & Knill, D. (2003). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 341-352.
45. Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S. V., & Poizner, H. (2003). Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 151, 158-166.
46. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (1999). A new view on grasping. Motor Control, 3, 237-271.
47. Smeets, J. B. J., Glover, S., & Brenner, E. (2003). Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping. Spatial Vision, 16, 311-324.
48. Soechting, J. F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 548-564.
49. Tunik, E., Frey, S. H., & Grafton, S. T. (2005). Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 505-511.
50. Tunik, E., Rice, N. J., Hamilton, A., & Grafton, S. T. (2007). Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage, 36, 77-86.
51. Wing, A. M., Turton, A., & Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 245-260.
52. Winges, S. A., Weber, D. J., & Santello, M. (2003). The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 489-498.
53. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. (1995, September 29). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880-1882.
54. Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 2, 338-347.
55. Woodworth, R. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monograph, 3(2), 1-114.