Frustrated nonsequential double ionization: A classical model

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Shomsky, K N ^a   Smith, Z S ^a   Haan, S L ^a  

^a CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL MODEL; DRIFT VELOCITIES; ELECTRON BOUND; LASER FIELDS; NONSEQUENTIAL DOUBLE IONIZATIONS; RECOLLISION;

IONIZATION OF GASES; LASER EXCITATION; LASERS;

PULSED LASER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 66649107241     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.061402     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. T. Nubbemeyer, K. Gorling, A. Saenz, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233001 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233001
2. G. L. Yudin and M. Y. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A 63, 033404 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.033404
3. see also T. Brabec, M. Y. Ivanov, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 54, R2551 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R2551
4. S. L. Haan, L. Breen, A. Karim, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 103008 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.103008
5. S. L. Haan, L. Breen, A. Karim, and J. H. Eberly, Opt. Express 15, 767 (2007). 10.1364/OE.15.000767
6. For reviews of NSDI, see R. Dörner, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys., 48, 1 (2002)
7. A. Becker, R. Dörner, and R. Moshammer, J. Phys. B 38, S753 (2005) 10.1088/0953-4075/38/9/021
8. A. Becker and F. H. M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 38, R1 (2005). 10.1088/0953-4075/38/3/R01
9. Effective energy diagrams were introduced in Ref.. Here, as in the second part of Ref., we plot the effective potential-energy curves in terms of only the z coordinate. The shape changes due to parametric dependence on x and y. Thus, for example, the nuclear well is evident only if x and y are small.
10. R. Panfili, S. L. Haan, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113001 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.113001
11. P. J. Ho, R. Panfili, S. L. Haan, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 093002 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.093002
12. P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71. 1994
13. K. J. Schafer, B. Yang, L. F. Di Mauro, and K. C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1599
14. E. Eremina, J. Phys. B 36, 3269 (2003). 10.1088/0953-4075/36/15/308
15. S. L. Haan, Z. S. Smith, K. N. Shomsky, and P. W. Plantinga, J. Phys. B (in press), e-print arXiv:0901.2554.
16. R. Grobe and M. V. Fedorov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2592 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2592
17. F. Mauger, C. Chandre, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173002 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173002
18. A similar plot appears in Fig. 2 of Ref. but for a 5 cycle laser pulse. The primary effect of increasing the pulse length is to favor RESI from recollisions occurring at about the time of a laser zero.
19. J. Javanainen, J. H. Eberly, and Q. Su, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3430 (1988) 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3430
20. J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5750 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.5750
21. J. I. Gersten and M. H. Mittleman, J. Phys. B 9, 2561 (1976) 10.1088/0022-3700/9/15/008
22. M. Gavrila and J. Z. Kaminski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 613 (1984) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.613
23. Q. Su, J. H. Eberly, and J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 862 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.862
24. R. Grobe and C. K. Law, Phys. Rev. A 44, R4114 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R4114