A nonlethal microsampling technique to monitor the effects of mercury on wild bird eggs

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 465-470

  Stebbins, Katherine R ^a   Klimstra, Jon D ^a   Eagles Smith, Collin A ^b   Ackerman, Joshua T ^b   Heinz, Gary H ^a  

^a PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Albumen; Mercury; Nonlethal microsample; Reproductive success; Wild bird eggs

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL FORMS; EFFECTIVE TOOL; FIELD STUDIES; HATCHING SUCCESS; LIFE STAGES; MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS; METHYL MERCURY; MICROSAMPLING; NONLETHAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SENSITIVE SPECIES; SMALL SAMPLES; WILD BIRDS;

EXTRACTION; MERCURY COMPOUNDS;

MERCURY (METAL);

ALBUMIN; MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY; ALBUMINOID;

BIRD; CAPTIVE BREEDING; EGG; HATCHING; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHYLMERCURY; POLLUTION EFFECT; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIRD; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGG; EMBRYO; FOWL; HATCHING; INCUBATION TIME; MERCURIALISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; TISSUE LEVEL; WILD ANIMAL; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLUTANT;

ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; HIMANTOPUS MEXICANUS; LARUS ATRICILLA; PHASIANIDAE; PHASIANUS COLCHICUS;

ALBUMINS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; BIRDS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; MERCURY; OVUM;

EID: 66649105883     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/08-316.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wiener JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AM. 2003. Ecotoxicology of mercury. In Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr, eds, Handbook of Ecotoxicology, 2nd ed. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 409-463.
2. Scheuhammer AM, Perrault JA, Bond DE. 2001. Mercury, methylmercury, and selenium concentrations in eggs of common loons (Gavia immer) from Canada. Environ Monit Assess 72: 79-94.
3. Lewis SA, Becker PH, Furness RW. 1993. Mercury levels in eggs, tissues, and feathers of herring gulls (Larus argentatus) from the German Wadden Sea coast. Environ Fallut 80: 293-299.
4. Heinz G. 1974. Effects of low dietary levels of methylmercury on mallard reproduction. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 11: 386-392.
5. Scheuhammer AM. 1987. The chronic toxicity of aluminum, cadmium, mercury and lead in birds: A review. Environ Pollut 46: 263-295.
6. Thompson DR. 1996. Mercury in birds and terrestrial, mammals. In Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW, eds, Environmental Contaminants in Wildlife: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 341-356.
7. Tejning S. 1967. Biological effects of methyl mercury dicyandiamide-treated grain in the domestic fowl Gallus gallus L. Oikos Suppl 8: 1-116.
8. Borg K, Wanntorp H, Erne K, Hanko E. 1969. Alkyl mercury poisoning in terrestrial Swedish wildlife. Viltrevy 6: 301-379.
9. Fimreite N. 1971. Effects of dietary methylmercury on ringnecked pheasants. Occasional Paper 9. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, ON.
10. Finley MT, Stendell RC. 1978. Survival and reproductive success of black ducks fed methyl mercury. Environ Pollut 16: 51-64.
11. Heinz GH. 1979. Methylmercury: Reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks.J Wildl Manag 43: 394-401.
12. Albers PH, Koterba MT, Rossman R, Link WA, French JB, Ben-nett RS, Bauer WC. 2007. Effects of methylmercury on reproduction in American kestrels. Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 1856-1866.
13. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Klimstra JD, Stebbins KR, Konrad SL, Erwin CA. 2009. Species differences in the sensitivity of avian embryos to methylmercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56: 129-138.
14. Fimreite N. 1974. Mercury contamination of aquatic birds in northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manag 38: 120-131.
15. Schwarzbach SE, Albertson JD, Thomas CM. 2006. Effects of predation, flooding, and contamination on reproductive success of California clapper rails (Rallus longirostris obsoletas) in San Francisco Bay. Auk 123: 45-60.
16. Blus LJ. 1984. DDE in bird's eggs: Comparison of two methods for estimating critical levels. Wilson Bull 96: 268-276.
17. Henny CJ, Herron GB. 1989. DDE, selenium, mercury, and whitefaced ibis reproduction at Carson Lake, Nevada. J Wildl Manag 53: 1032-1045.
18. Henny CJ, Grove RA, Kaiser JL. 2008. Osprey distribution, abundance, reproductive success, and contamination burdens along Lower Columbia River, 1997/1998 versus 2004. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54: 525-534.
19. Evers DC, Taylor KM, Major A, Taylor RJ, Poppenga RH, Scheuhammer AM. 2003. Common loon eggs as indicators of methylmercury availability in North America. Ecotoxicology 12: 69-81.
20. Becker PH. 1992. Egg mercury levels decline with the laying sequence in charadriiformes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 48: 762-767.
21. Evers DC, Burgess NM, Champoux L, Hoskins B, Major A, Goodale WM, Taylor RJ, Poppenga R, Daigle T. 2005. Patterns and interpretations of mercury exposure in freshwater avian communities in northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14: 193-221.
22. Longcore JR, Haines TA, Halteman WA. 2007. Mercury in tree swallow food, eggs, bodies, and feathers at Acadia National Park, Maine, and an EPA superfund site, Ayer, Massachusetts. Environ Monit Assess 126: 129-143.
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Mercury in solids and. solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption, spectrophotometry: Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. Method 7473, SW 846, Update IVA. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
24. Eisler R. 2000. Handbook of Chemical Risk Assessment: Health Hazards to Humans, Plants, and Animals, Vol 1. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
25. Hays H, LeCroy H. 1971. Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the common tern. Wilson Bull 83: 425-429.
26. Dinsmore JJ, Schreiber RW. 1974. Breeding and annual cycle of laughing gulls in Tampa Bay, Florida. Wilson Bull 86: 419-427.
27. Hill WL. 1993. Importance of prenatal nutrition to the development of a precocial chick. Developmental Psychobiology 26: 237-249.
28. Finkler MS, Van Orman JB, Sutherland PR. 1998. Experimental manipulation of egg quality in chickens: Influence of albumen and yolk on the size and body composition, or near-term, embryos in a precocial bird. J Comp Physiol Behav 168: 17-24.
29. Ferrari RP, Martinelli R, Saino N. 2006. Differential effects of egg albumen content on barn swallow nestlings in relation to hatch order. J Evol Biol 19: 981-993.
30. Deeming DC. 2002. Avian Incubation. Oxford University, New York, NY, USA.
31. Romanoff AL. 1967. Biochemistry of the Avian Embryo. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
32. Sutherland PR, Rahn H. 1987. On the composition of bird eggs. Condor 89: 48-65.
33. Heinz GH. 1993. Selenium accumulation and loss in mallard eggs. Environ Toxicol Chem 12: 775-778.
34. Romanoff AL, Romanoff AJ. 1949. The Avian. Egg. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
35. Cassey P, Ewen JG, Boulton RL, Karada F, Moller AP, Blackburn TM. 2007. A. nondestructive method for extracting maternally derived, egg carotenoids. J Field Ornithol 78: 314-321.