Review of adverse health effects of odours in field studies

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1281-1289

  Sucker, K ^a   Both, R ^b   Winneke, G ^c  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b North Rhine Westphalia State Agency for Nature   (Germany)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal production; Annoyance; Environmental odours; Health complaints; Somatic symptoms

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS; ANIMAL PRODUCTION; ANNOYANCE; COVARIATES; DATA ANALYSIS; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DOSE RESPONSE; DOSE-DEPENDENT MANNER; ENVIRONMENTAL ODOURS; EXPOSURE CONDITIONS; FIELD INSPECTION; FIELD STUDIES; HEDONIC TONE; IN-FIELD; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; LIVESTOCK OPERATIONS; MULTIPLE LOGISTIC REGRESSION; PREDICTIVE VALUES; REGRESSION MODEL; SOMATIC SYMPTOMS;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; CAST IRON; HEALTH; ODORS; PIG IRON; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

INDUSTRIAL PLANTS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; HEALTH IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; ODOR; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANNOYANCE; ANOREXIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DYSPNEA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EYE IRRITATION; FEMALE; FEVER; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INDUSTRY AND INDUSTRIAL PHENOMENA; INSOMNIA; MALE; NAUSEA; NOSE IRRITATION; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; POLLUTION; STOMACH DISEASE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; VOMITING;

AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; AIR POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GERMANY; HUMANS; ODORS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; BOS; SUIDAE;

EID: 66649101332     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.113     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cavalini, P. M., Koeter-Kemmerling, L. G. & Pulles, M. P. J. 1991 Coping with odor annoyance and odor concentration: three field studies. J. Environ. Psychol. 11, 123-142.
2. Herr, C. E. W., zur Nieden, A., Rethage, T., Stilianakis, N., Eikmann, T. F. 2004 Health parameters as risk factors for the perception of annoying environmental odours in residential areas. Paper presented at the European conference on Environmental Odour Management, Cologne, Germany.
3. Luginaah, I. N., Taylor, S. M., Elliott, S. J. & Eyles, J. S. 2002 Community reappraisal of the perceived health effects of al petroleum refinery. Soc. Sci. Med. 55(1), 47-61. (Pubitemid 34606923)
4. Miedema, H. M. E., Walpot, J. I., Vos, H. & Steunenberg, C. F. 2000 Exposure-annoyance relationships for odour from industrial sources. Atmos. Environ. 34(18), 2927-2936. (Pubitemid 30256037)
5. Neutra, R., Lipscomb, J., Satin, K. & Shusterman, D. 1991 Hypotheses to explain the higher symptom rates observed around hazardous waste sites. Environ. Health Perspect. 94, 31-34.
6. Nimmermark, S. 2004 Odour influence on well-being and health with specific focus on animal production emissions. Annu. Agric. Environ. Med. 11, 163-173. (Pubitemid 40065242)
7. Radon, K., Peters, A., Praml, G., Ehrenstein, V., Schulze, A., Hehl, O. & Nowak, D. 2004 Livestock odours and quality of life of neighbouring residents. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 11, 59-62. (Pubitemid 38868634)
8. Rief, W., Hessel, A. & Braehler, E. 2001 Somatization symptoms and hypochondrical features in the general population. Psychosom. Med. 63, 595-602. (Pubitemid 32695140)
9. Shusterman, D. 1992 Critical review: the health significance of environmental odor pollution. Arch. Environ. Health 47(1), 76-87.
10. Shusterman, D., Lipscomb, J., Satin, K. & Neutra, R. 1991 Symptom prevalence and odor-worry interaction near hazardous waste sites. Environ. Health Perspect. 94, 25-30.
11. Steinheider, B. & Winneke, G. 1993 Industrial odours as environmental stressors: exposure-annoyance associations and their modification by coping, age and perceived health. J. Environ. Psychol. 13, 353-363.
12. Steinheider, B., Both, R. & Winneke, G. 1998 Field studies on environmental odors inducing annoyance as well as gastric and general health-related symptoms. J. Psychophysiol. (Suppl. 1), 64-79. (Pubitemid 28386591)
13. Sucker, K., Both, R., Bischoff, M., Guski, R. & Winneke, G. 2008a Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 81(6), 671-682.
14. Sucker, K., Both, R., Bischoff, M., Guski, R., Krämer, U. & Winneke, G. 2008b Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part II: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 81(6), 683-694.
15. Thu, K., Donham, K., Ziegenhorn, R., Reynolds, S., Thorne, P. S., Subramanian, P., Whiten, P. & Stookesberry, J. 1997 A control study of physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. J. Agric. Saf. Health 3, 13-26.
16. Wing, S. & Wolf, S. 2000 Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among Eastern North Carolina residents. Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 233-238. (Pubitemid 30195581)
17. Winneke, G. & Kastka, J. 1987 Comparison of odor-annoyance data from different industrial sources: problems and implications. In: Koelega, H. S. (ed.) Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement, and Control. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 129-137.
18. Winneke, G., Frechen, F.-B., Both, R. & Steinheider, B. 1997 Psychology of odour annoyance: linear and non-linear dose-effect relationships, memory effects and psychosomatic complaints. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference on Environmental Psychology, Düsseldorf, Germany.