Potential of bioactive glass particles of different size ranges to affect bone formation in interproximal periodontal defects in dogs

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 808-815

  Felipe, Maria Emília M C ^a   Andrade, Patrícia F ^a   Novaes Jr , A B ^a   Grisi, Márcio F M ^a   Souza, Sérgio L S ^a   Taba, Mário ^a   Palioto, Daniela B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone regeneration; Case comparison studies; Glass; Grafts; Guided tissue regeneration; Membranes

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; DRUG EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIODONTICS; RANDOMIZATION;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; DOGS; GLASS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; PARTICLE SIZE; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 66649086267     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080583     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gottlow J, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennström J. New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:604-616.
2. Caffesse RG, Nasjleti CE, Morrison EC, Sanchez R. Guided tissue regeneration: Comparison of bioabsorb-able and non-bioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 1994; 65:583-591.
3. Sculean A, Donos N, Chiantella GC, Windisch P, Reich E, Brecx M. GTR with bioresorbable membranes in the treatment of intrabony defects: A clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19:501-509.
4. Sculean A, Donos N, Windisch P, et al. Healing of human intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontal Res 1999;34:310-322.
5. Andrade PF, Souza SL, Macedo GO, et al. Acellular dermal matrix as a membrane for guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of Class II furcation lesions: A histometric and clinical study in dogs. J Periodontol 2007;78:1288-1299.
6. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: Scientific evidence and clinical experience. J Periodontol 2005; 76:341-350.
7. American Academy of Periodontology. Periodontal regeneration (position paper). J Periodontol 2005;76: 1601-1622.
8. Sculean A, Barbé U, Chiantella GC, Arweiler NB, Berakdar M, Brecx M. Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol 2002;73: 401-408.
9. Hench LL, West JK. Biological application of bioactive glasses. Life Chem Rep 1996;13:187-241.
10. Schepers EJ, Ducheyne P. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range for the treatment of oral bone defects: A 1-24 month experiment with several materials and particle sizes and size ranges. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24:171-181.
11. Shapoff CA, Bowers GM, Levy B, Mellonig JT, Yukna RA. The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogeneic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. J Periodontol 1980;51: 625-630.
12. Zaner DJ, Yukna RA. Particle size of periodontal bone grafting materials. J Periodontol 1984;55:406-409.
13. Yukna RA. Synthetic bone grafts in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 1993;1:92-99.
14. Wheeler DL, Stokes KE, Hoellrich RG, Chamberland DL, McLoughlin SW. Effect of bioactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:527-533.
15. Mengel R, Schreiber D, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Bioab-sorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: Results of a 5-year clinical and radiological study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1781-1787.
16. Mengel R, Soffner M, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Bioabsorb-able membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: Results of a 12-month clinical and radiological study. J Periodontol 2003;74:899-908.
17. Yukna RA, Evans GH, Aichelmann-Reidy MB, Mayer ET. Clinical comparison of bioactive glass bone replacement graft material and expanded polytetra-fluoroethylene barrier membrane in treating human mandibular molar class 11 furcations. J Periodontol 2001;72:125-133.
18. Anderegg CR, Alexander DC, Freidman M. A bioactive glass particulate in the treatment of molar furcation invasions. J Periodontol 1999;70:384-387.
19. Park JS, Suh JJ, Choi SH, et al. Effects of pretreat-ment clinical parameters on bioactive glass implantation in intrabony periodontal defects. J Periodontol 2001;72:730-740.
20. Novaes AB Jr., Vidigal Júnior GM, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Polloni S, Rosa A. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:422-427.
21. Macedo GO, Souza SL, Novaes AB Jr., Grisi MF, Taba M Jr., Palioto DB. Effect of early membrane removal on regeneration of Class II furcation defects in dogs. J Periodontol 2006;77:46-53.
22. Simion M, Maglione M, Iamoni F, Scarano A, Piattelli A, Salvato A. Bacterial penetration through Resolut resorbable membrane in vitro. An histological and scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:23-31.
23. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Alveolar ridge augmentation using a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts. An experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:203-213.
24. Nowzari H, Matian F, Slots J. Periodontal pathogens on polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:469-474.
25. Yoshinari N, Tohya T, Mori A, et al. Inflammatory cell population and bacterial contamination of membranes used for guided tissue regenerative procedures. J Periodontol 1998;69:460-469.
26. Hung SL, Lin YW, Wang YH, Chen YT, Su CY, Ling LJ. Permeability of Streptococcus mutans and Actino-bacillus actinomycetemcomitans through guided tissue regeneration membranes and their effects on attachment of periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontol 2002;73:843-851.
27. Blumenthal N, Sabe T, Barrington E. Healing responses to grafting of combined collagen-decalcified bone in periodontal defects in dogs. J Periodontol 1986;57:84-90.
28. Clergeau LP, Danan M, Clergeau-Guérithault S, Brion M. Healing response to anorganic bone implantation in periodontal intrabony defects in dogs. Part I. Bone regeneration. A microradiographic study. J Periodontol 1996;67:140-149.
29. Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, et al. Periodontal repair in surgically created intrabony defects in dogs: Influence of the number of bone walls on healing response. J Periodontol 2004;75:229-235.
30. Hall EE, Meffert RM, Hermann JS, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL. Comparison of bioactive glass to demin-eralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects around implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1999;70:526-535.
31. Macedo NL, Matuda FS, Macedo L, Gonzalez MB, Ouchi SM, Carvalho YR. Bone defect regeneration with bioactive glass implantation in rats. JAppl Oral Sci 2004;12:137-143.
32. Villaça JH, Novaes AB Jr., Souza SL, Taba M Jr., Molina GO, Carvalho TL. Bioactive glass efficacy in the periodontal healing of intrabony defects in monkeys. Braz Dent J 2005;16:67-74.