Out-of-network events can be of great importance for improving results of local earthquake tomography

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 2556-2563

  Koulakov, Ivan ^a  

^a TROFIMUK INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1-D MODELS; DATA SETS; EVENT SELECTION; INVERSION RESULTS; REAL SITUATION; STATION LOCATION; STATION NETWORK; THREE MODELS; TOMOGRAPHIC INVERSION;

EARTHQUAKES; LIGHTING FIXTURES; TOMOGRAPHY;

EXPERIMENTS;

DATA INVERSION; DATA SET; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; SOURCE PARAMETERS;

ASIA; CENTRAL JAVA; EURASIA; INDONESIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 66549089918     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120080365     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aki, K., A. Christofferson, and E. S. Husebye (1977). Determination of the three dimensional structure of the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 277-296.
2. Barberi, G., M. T. Cosentino, A. Gervasi, I. Guerra, G. Neri, and B. Orecchio (2004). Crustal seismic tomography in the Calabrian Arc region, south Italy, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 147, 297-314.
3. w 6.0 Colfiorito fault region (central Italy): A contribution to the understanding of seismotectonic and seismogenic processes, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B5, 2248, doi 10.1029/2001JB001665.
4. Daly, E., D. Keir, C. J. Ebinger, G. W. Stuart, I. D. Bastow, and A. Ayele (2008). Crustal tomographic imaging of a transitional continental rift: The Ethiopian rift, Geophys. J. Int. 172, 1033-1048.
5. Dias, N. A., L. Matias, N. Lourenço, J. Madeira, F. Carrilho, and J. L. Gaspar (2007). Crustal seismic velocity structure near Faial and Pico Islands (AZORES), from local earthquake tomography, Tectonophysics 445, 301-317.
6. Eberhart-Phillips, D., and S. Bannister (2002). Three-dimensional crustal structure in the Southern Alps region of New Zealand from inversion of local earthquake and active source data, J. Geophys. Res. 107, no. B10, 2262, doi 10.1029/2001JB000567.
7. Evans, J., and U. Achauer (1993). Teleseismic velocity tomography using the ACH method: theory and application to continental scale studies, in Seismic tomography: Theory and Practice, H. Iyer and K. Hirahara (Editors), Chapman and Hall, London, 319-360.
8. Husen, S., and R. B. Smith (2004). Probabilistic earthquake relocation in three-dimensional velocity models for the Yellowstone National Park region, Wyoming, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 880-896.
9. Husen, S., E. Kissling, and E. R. Flueh (2000). Local earthquake tomogra-phy of shallow subduction in north Chile: A combined onshore and offshore study, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 28,183-28,198.
10. Husen, S., R. Quintero, E. Kissling, and B. Hacker (2003). Subduction-zone structure and magmatic processes beneath Costa Rica constrained by local earthquake tomography and petrological modeling, Geophys. J. Int. 155, 11-32.
11. Husen, S., R. B. Smith, and G. P. Waite (2004). Evidence for gas and magmatic sources beneath the Yellowstone volcanic field from seismic tomographic imaging, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 131, 397-410.
12. International Seismological Centre (2001). Bulletin Disks 1-9 [CD-ROM], Internatl. Seis. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom.
13. Kato, A., T. Iidaka, E. Kurashimo, S. Nakagawa, N. Hirata, and T. Iwasaki (2007). Delineation of probable asperities on the Atotsugawa fault, central Japan, using a dense temporary seismic network, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L09318, doi 10.1029/2007GL029604.
14. Koulakov, I. (2009). LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inver-sion. Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99, no. 1, doi 10.1785/0120080013.
15. Koulakov, I., M. Bohm, G. Asch, B.-G. Lühr, A. Manzanares, K. S. Brotopuspito, P. Fauzi, M. A. Purbawinata, N. T. Puspito, A. Ratdomopurbo, H. Kopp, W. Rabbel, and E. Shevkunova (2007). P and S velocity structure of the crust and the upper mantle beneath central Java from local tomography inversion, J. Geophys. Res. 112, B08310, doi 10.1029/2006JB004712.
16. Lippitsch, R., E. Kissling, and J. Ansorge (2003). Upper-mantle structure beneath the Alpine orogen from high-resolution teleseismic tomography, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B8, 2376-2390.
17. Paul, A., M. Cattaneo, F. Thouvenot, D. Spallarossa, N. Bethoux, and J. Frechet (2001). A three-dimensional crustal velocity model of the south-western Alps from local earthquake tomography, J. Geophys. Res. 106, no. B9 19367-19389.
18. s, J. Geophys. Res. 87, no. B5, 4073-4088.
19. Sandoval, S., E. Kissling, and J. Ansorge The SVEKALAPKO STWG(2004). High-resolution body wave tomography beneath the SVEKA-LAPKO array: II. Anomalous upper mantle structure beneath the central Baltic Shield, Geophys. J. Int. 157, 200-214.
20. s structure at Loma Prieta, California, from local earthquake tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, no. 22, 3079-3082.
21. s ratios in the New Madrid seismic zone, J. Geophys. Res. 106, no. B7, 13,501-13,514.