The influence of visual and auditory information on the perception of speech and non-speech oral movements in patients with left hemisphere lesions

Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 208-221

  Schmid, Gabriele ^a   Thielmann, Anke ^a   Ziegler, Wolfram ^a  

^a Munich Municipal Hospitals   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Apraxia of speech; Audiovisual; McGurk effect; Orofacial apraxia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; IMITATION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL SYSTEM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FACE; HEARING; LINGUISTICS; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APHASIA; APRAXIAS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 66549083860     PISSN: 02699206     EISSN: 14645076     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699200802399913     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Argall, B. D. and Martin, A. (2004) Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41, pp. 809-823.
2. Best, C. T. and Avery, R. A. (1999) Left-hemisphere advantage for click consonants is determined by linguistic significance and experience. Psychological Science, 10, pp. 65-70.
3. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. and Sithole, N. M. (1988) Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, pp. 345-360.
4. Bizzozero, I., Costato, D., Della Sala, S., Papagno, C., Spinnler, H. and Venneri, A. (2000) Upper and lower face apraxia: Role of the right hemisphere. Brain, 123, pp. 2213-2230.
5. Calvert, G. A., Brammer, M. J. and Iversen, S. D. (1998) Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, pp. 247-253.
6. Campbell, R. (1996) Seeing brains reading speech: A review and speculations. Speechreading by Humans and Machines, pp. 115-133. Springer, Berlin
7. De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N. and Tabatabaie, S. (2004) LEMO-Lexikon modellorientiert, Elsevier, Stuttgart
8. Easton, R. D. and Basala, M. (1982) Perceptual dominance during lipreading. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, pp. 562-570.
9. Erber, N. (1969) Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, pp. 423-426.
10. Green, K. P. (1996) The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic perception. Speechreading by humans and machines, pp. 55-77. Springer, Berlin
11. Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D. and Willmes, K. (1983) Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT), Hogrefe, Gottingen
12. Kim, J., Davis, C. and Krins, P. (2004) Amodal processing of visual speech as revealed by priming. Cognition, 93, pp. B39-B47.
13. Kuhl, P. K. and Meltzoff, A. (1982) The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, pp. 1138-1141.
14. Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. (1985) The motor theory of speech perception. Cognition, 21, pp. 1-36.
15. Liepold, M., Ziegler, W. and Brendel, B. (2003) Hierarchische Wortlisten - Ein Nachsprechtest fur die Sprechapraxiediagnostik, Borgmann-Verlag, Dortmund
16. Massaro, D. W. (1987) Speechperception by ear and eye, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
17. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, pp. 746-748.
18. Saldana, H. M. and Rosenblum, L. D. (1993) Visual influence on auditory pluck and bow judgements. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, pp. 406-416.
19. Schmid, G. and Ziegler, W. (2006) Audio-visual matching of speech and non-speech oral gestures in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Neuropsychologia, 44, pp. 546-555.
20. Sumby, W. and Pollack, I. (1954) Visual contribution to speech intelligbility in noise. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 26, pp. 212-215.
21. Summerfield, A. Q. (1979) Use of visual information for phonetic perception. Phonetica, 36, pp. 314-331.
22. Summerfield, Q. (1987) Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. Hearing by eye: The psychology of lipreading, pp. 3-52. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
23. Ziegler, W. (2003) Speech motor control is task-specific: Evidence from dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 17, pp. 3-36.
24. Ziegler, W. (2003) To speak or not to speak: Distinctions between speech and nonspeech motor control. A reply to Ballard, Robin and Folkins. Aphasiology, 17, pp. 99-105.
25. Zierdt, A. (2005) Universal data acquisition program - UDAP 3.41 [software]. http://lrz-muenchen.de/~UDAP/