Building company health promotion capacity: A unique collaboration between cargill and the centers for disease control and prevention

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Lang, Jason E ^a   Hersey, James C ^b   Isenberg, Karen L ^b   Lynch, Christina M ^b   Majestic, Elizabeth ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES;

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; PUBLIC-PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 66449128217     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 1999 National worksite health promotion survey. Washington (DC): Association for Worksite Health Promotion, William M Mercer Inc, US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1999.
2. Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting US employers. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(4):398-412.
3. Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ. The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:303-23.
4. Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VI 2000-2004. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47(10):1051-8.
5. Aldana S. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 2001;15(5):296-320.
6. Fronstin P. Sources of health insurance and characteristics of the uninsured: analysis of the March 2005 current population survey. EBRI Issue Brief 2005;287:1-31. http://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_11-20051.pdf
7. Health, United States, 2007 with chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.
8. 2007 Kaiser/HRET employer health benefits survey. Menlo Park (CA): Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust; 2007. http://www.kff.org/insurance/7672/index.cfm.
9. Leading by example: CEOs on the business case for worksite health promotion. Washington (DC): Partnership for Prevention; 2005.
10. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D. Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the United States: results from the American Productivity Audit. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(12):1234-46.
11. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The guide to community preventive services: what works to promote health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
12. Linnan L, Bowling M, Childress J, Lindsay G, Blakey C, Pronk S, et al. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey. Am J Public Health 2008;98(8):1503-9.
13. Wilson MG, DeJoy DM, Jorgensen CM, Crump CJ. Health promotion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey. Am J Health Promot 1999;13(6):358-65.
14. Dunet DO, Sparling PB, Hersey J, Williams-Piehota P, Hill MD, Hanssen C, et al. A new evaluation tool to obtain practice-based evidence of worksite health promotion programs. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(4). http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/oct/07_0173.htm.