THE CONTRIBUTION OF VISUAL INFORMATION TO ON-LINE SENTENCE PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FROM PHONEME MONITORING

Auditory-Visual Speech Processing 1999, AVSP 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages

  Cox, Ethan A ^a   Norrix, Linda ^a   Green, Kerry P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO-VISUAL SPEECH; AUDIOVISUAL PROCESSING; MCGURK EFFECT; SENTENCE PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 6644225926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. McGurk, H., and MacDonald, J. “Hearing lips and seeing speech,” Nature, Vol. 264, 1976, p 746-748.
2. Sumby, W.G., and Pollack, I. “Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise,” J. Acoustic. Soc. Amer., Vol. 26, 1954, p 212-215.
3. Smeele, P.M.T. (1994). “Perceiving speech: Integrating auditory and visual speech,” PhD Dissertation, Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands).
4. Green, K.P., and Gerdeman, A. “Cross-modal discrepancies in coarticulation and the integration of speech information: the McGurk effect with mismatched vowels,” J. Exp. Psy.:Hum. Percep. Perform., Vol. 21, 1995, p 1409-1426.
5. Munhall, K.G., and Tohkura, Y. “Audiovisual gating and the timecourse of speech perception,” J. Acoustic. Soc. Amer., Vol. 104, 1998, p 530-539.
6. Warren, R.M. “Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds,” Science, Vol. 167, 1970, p 392-393.
7. Samuel, A. “Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology,” J. Exp. Psy.:General, Vol. 110, 1981, p 474-494.
8. Connine, C.M., and Clifton, C. Jr.. “Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception,” J. Exp. Psy.:Hum. Percep. Perform., Vol. 13, 1987, p 291-299
9. Foss, J.D., and Blank, M.A. “Identifying the speech codes,” Cog. Psy., Vol. 12, 1980, p 1-31.
10. Segui, J., Fraunfelder, U., and Mehler, J. “Phoneme monitoring, syllable monitoring and lexical access,” Brit. J. Psy.,Vol. 72, 1981, p 471-477.
11. Foss, J.D., and Gernsbacher, M.A. “Cracking the dual code: Toward a unitary model of speech perception,” J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., Vol. 22, 1983, p 609-632.
12. Kucera, J., and Francis, W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English, Brown University Press, Providence, 1967.
13. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. “PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers,” Behav. Res. Meth., Inst., and Comp., Vol 25, 1993, p 257-271.
14. Walden, B.E., Prosek, R.A., Montgomery, A.A., Scheer, C.K., and Jones, C.J., “Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants,” J. of Sp. & H. Res., Vol. 20, 1977, p130-145,.
15. Grosjean, F. “Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm,” Percep. & Psychophys., Vol. 28, 1980, p 267-283.
16. Grosjean, F. “Gating,” Lang & Cog. Proc., Vol. 11, 1996, p 597-604.
17. Cutler, A. “Spoken word recognition and production,” in Speech, Language and Communication, J.L. Miller. and P.D. Eimas, eds., Academic, San Diego., 1995.
18. McCusker, L.X., Hillinger, M.L., and Bias, R.G., “Phonological recoding and reading,” Psy. Bul., Vol. 89, 1981, p 217-245.
19. Goldinger, S.D. “Auditory lexical decision,” Lang. & Cog. Proc., Vol. 11, 1996, p 560-567.