A stochastic model for the evolution of metabolic networks with neighbor dependence

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1528-1535

  Mithani, Aziz ^a   Preston, Gail M ^a   Hein, Jotun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS; SAMPLING; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSEUDOMONAS;

PSEUDOMONAS;

EID: 66349136048     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp262     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baier,C. et al. (2003) Model-checking algorithms for continuous-time Markov chains. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 29, 524-541.
2. Berg,J. et al. (2004) Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: A statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. BMC Evol. Biol., 4, 51.
3. Boccaletti,S. et al. (2006) Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep., 424, 175-308.
4. Chung,F. et al. (2003) Duplication models for biological networks. J. Comput. Biol., 10, 677-687.
5. Dorogovtsev,S. and Mendes,J. (2003) Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Felsenstein,J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol., 17, 368-376.
7. Gilks,W. et al. (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
8. Jensen,J. and Pedersen,A. (2000) Probabilistic models of DNA sequence evolution with context dependent rates of substitution. Adv. Appl. Probab., 32, 499-517.
9. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2006) From genomics to chemical genomics: New developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D354-D357.
10. Koskinen,J. (2004) Bayesian inference for longitudinal social networks. Research Report, number 2004:4, Stockholm University, Department of Statistics, Sweden.
11. Koskinen,J. and Snijders,T. (2007) Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data, J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 137, 3930-3938.
12. Light,S. et al. (2005) Preferential attachment in the evolution of metabolic networks. BMC Genomics, 6, 159.
13. Liu,J. (2001) Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York.
14. Ma,H. and Zeng,A. (2003) Reconstruction of metabolic networks from genome data and analysis of their global structure for various organisms. Bioinformatics, 19, 270-277.
15. Miklos,I. et al. (2004) A "long indel" model for evolutionary sequence alignment. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21, 529-540.
16. Mithani,A. et al. (2009) Rahnuma: Hypergraph based tool for metabolic pathway prediction and network comparison. Bioinformatics [Epub ahead of print, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp269]
17. Ross,S. (2007) Introduction to Probability Models. Academic press, Amsterdam, Boston.
18. Snijders,T. (2005) Models for longitudinal network data, Ch. 11. In Carrington,P. et al. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Snijders,T. and Van Duijn,M. (1997) Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In Conte,R. et al. (eds), Simulating social phenomena, Berlin, Springer, pp. 493-512.
20. Ueda,H. and Hogenesch,J. (2005) Principles in the evolution of metabolic networks, Arxiv preprint q-bio.MN/0503038.
21. Wiuf,C. et al. (2006) A likelihood approach to analysis of network data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 7566-7570.
22. Yeung,M. et al. (2007) Estimation of the number of extreme pathways for metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 363.