Prospective randomised multi-centre trial comparing the clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of circular stapled anopexy with closed diathermy haemorrhoidectomy

Gut

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 668-678

  Thaha, M A ^a,f   Campbell, K L ^a   Kazmi, S A ^a   Irvine, L A ^a   Khalil, A ^a   Binnie, N R ^b   Hendry, W S ^c   Walker, A ^d   Staines, H J ^e   Steele, R J C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c Stirling Royal Infirmary   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CIRCULAR STAPLED ANOPEXY HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLOSED DIATHERMY HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIATHERMY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TISSUE INJURY; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ANAL CANAL; HEMORRHOID; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANAL CANAL; DIATHERMY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 66349104044     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.151266     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995:38:687-94.
2. Eu KW, Teoh TA, Seow-Choen F, et al. Anal stricture following haemorrhoidectomy: early diagnosis and treatment. Aust N Z J Surg 1995:65:101-3.
3. Johannsson HO, Graf W, Pahlman L. Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Em J Surg 2002:168:485-9.
4. Bennett RC, Friedman MH, Goligher JC. Late results of haemorrhoidectomy by ligature and excision. Br Med J 1963:5351: 216-9.
5. Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975:62:542-52.
6. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Montori A, Lirichi MM, Montori J, eds. 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery 1998, Rome, Italy. Monduzzi editore, 1998:777-84.
7. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000:355:779-81.
8. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000:355:782-5.
9. Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan- Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005:242:29-35.
10. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002:89:1376-81.
11. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001:88:1049-53.
12. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004:47:1837- 45.
13. Hunt L, Luck AJ, Rudkin G, et al. Day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1999:86:255-8.
14. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:(4):CD005393.
15. Morgado PJ, Suarez JA, Gomez LG, et al. Histoclinical basis for a new classification of hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1988:31:474-80.
16. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001:88:669-74.
17. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004:47:1824-36.
18. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000:356:730-3.
19. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000:355:810.
20. Bonner C, Prohm P, Storkel S. Fournier gangrene as a rare complication after stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Case report and review of the literature. Chirurg 2001:72:1464-6.
21. Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schumann D, et al. Early rectal stenosis following stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. BMC Surg 2004:4:6.
22. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002:45:268-70.
23. McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CR. Rectovaginal fstula after stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 2004:6:64-5.
24. Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, et al. Postdefaecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 2005:92:208-10.