Reverse fingerprinting and mutual information-based activity labeling and scoring (MIBALS)

Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 424-439

  Williams, Chris ^a   Schreyer, Suzanne K ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY AND CANCER   (Canada)

^b Polychromix   (United States)

Author keywords

Fingerprints; Fragment scoring; Pharmacophores; Similarity searching; Virtual screening

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; PHARMACOPHORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REVERSE FINGERPRINTING AND MUTUAL INFORMATION BASED ACTIVITY LABELING AND SCORING; SCORING SYSTEM; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DISCOVERY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 66249142715     PISSN: 13862073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138620709788167953     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 1Brown, R.; Martin, Y.C. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 572-584.
2. Durant, J. L.; Leland, B. A.; Henry, D. R.; Nourse, J.G. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2002, 42, 1273-1280.
3. */FCFP*, Extended Connectivity Rings, Scitegic In c., San Diego CA: USA 92123 www.scitegic.com
4. Bender, A.; Glen, R.C. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 2002, 44, 1708-1718.
5. Xue, L.; Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1999, 39, 881-886.
6. BCI - Barnard Chemical Information Lt d., Sheffield: UK, www.bci.gb.com
7. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D.; Underwood, D. J.; Kearsley, S.K. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 128-135.
8. Clark, R. D.; Fox, P. C.; Abrahamian, E.J. In Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery; Alvarez, J.; Shoichet, B.; Eds. Taylor and Francis, New York, 2005.
9. Schneider, G.; Neidhart, W.; Giller, T.; Schmid, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2894-2896.
10. Willett, P. J. Med. Chem., 2005, 38, 4183-4199.
11. Stahl, M.; Mauser, H. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2005, 45, 542-548.
12. Pozzan, A. Curr. Pharm. Des., 2006, 12, 2099-2110.
13. Shemetulskis, N. E.; Weininger, D.; Blankley, C. J.; Yang, J. J.; Humblet, C. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 862-871.
14. Xue, L.; Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 2003, 43, 1151-1157.
15. Schneider, G.; Byvatove, E. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 2004, 44, 993-999.
16. Thomsen, M.; Dobel, S.; Lassen, P.; Carlsen, L.; Mogensen, B. B.; Hansen, P.E. Chemosphere, 2002, 49, 1317-1325.
17. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc. Mission Viejo: CA USA, www.daylight.com
18. Cover, T. M.; Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1991.
19. Kullbeck, S.; Leibler, R.A. Ann. Math. Stat., 1951, 22, 79-86.
20. Shannon, C. E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Commu- nication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, Il, 1949.
21. Venkatraman, V.; Dalby, A. R.; Yang, Z.R. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 1686-1692.
22. Bonchev, D. Information Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structures; Research Studies Press: Chichester: UK 1983.
23. Maggiora, G. M.; Shanmugasundaram, V. J. Math. Chem., 2005, 38, 1-20.
24. Rossi, F.; Lendasse, A.; Francois, D.; Wertz, V.; Verlaysen, M.; Chemom. Intell. Lab Syst., 2006, 80, 215-226.
25. Yockey, H.P. Information Theory and Molecular Biology, Cam- bridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.
26. Sun, H. J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 4031-4039.
27. Sun, H. Chem. Med. Chem., 2006, 1, 315-322.
28. Klon, A. E.; Glick, M.; Davies, J.W. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 2216-2224.
29. Ginn, C.M. R.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des., 2000, 20, 1-16.
30. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P. A.; Azzaoui, K.; Ja- coby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 3256-3266.
31. Ginn, C.M.R. The Application of Data Fusion Methods to Similar- ity Searching of Chemical Databases; Ph. D. thesis: University of Sheffield: Sheffield, 1998.
32. Jubilant Biosys Ltd., 6, Second Stage Industrial Area, Yesh- wanthpur, Bangalore 560 022 India.
33. MOE (The Molecular Operating Environment) Version 2006.08, software available from Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1010 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 910, Montreal: Canada H3A 2R7, http://www.chemcomp.com
34. MDL Information Systems, Inc. www.mdli.com
35. Williams, C. Mol. Div., 2006, 10, 311-332.
36. Henderson, A.R. Ann. Clin. Biochem., 1993, 30, 521-539.
37. Hanley, J. A.; McNeil, B.J. Radiology, 1982, 143, 29-36.