Confinement-induced Efimov resonances in Fermi-Fermi mixtures

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Nishida, Yusuke ^a   Tan, Shina ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY PARAMETERS; DILUTE LIMIT; EFIMOV EFFECTS; FREE SPACE; IDENTICAL BOSONS; ONE DIMENSION; SCALING FACTORS; SCATTERING LENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONS; THREE-BODY RECOMBINATION; ULTRA-COLD;

MIXTURES;

FERMIONS;

EID: 66249131697     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.060701     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. M. Taglieber, A.-C. Voigt, T. Aoki, T. W. Hänsch, and K. Dieckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 010401 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.010401
2. E. Wille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 053201 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 053201
3. A.-C. Voigt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020405 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.020405
4. Y. Nishida and S. Tan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170401 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.170401
5. Y. Nishida, Ann. Phys. 324, 897 (2009). 10.1016/j.aop.2008.10.011
6. D. S. Petrov, G. E. Astrakharchik, D. J. Papoular, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130407 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130407
7. T. Kraemer, Nature (London) 440, 315 (2006). 10.1038/nature04626
8. S. Knoop, Nat. Phys. 5, 227 (2009). 10.1038/nphys1203
9. G. Barontini, e-print arXiv:0901.4584.
10. T. B. Ottenstein, T. Lompe, M. Kohnen, A. N. Wenz, and S. Jochim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 203202 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.203202
11. J. H. Huckans, J. R. Williams, E. L. Hazlett, R. W. Stites, and K. M. O'Hara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 165302 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.165302
12. D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. A 67, 010703 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67. 010703
13. The Born-Oppenheimer approximation gives 0.907 for s0, while the exact value is 1.02. Therefore the error of the Efimov parameter computed here is expected to be of the order of 10%.
14. P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 463 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.463
15. P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Nucl. Phys. A 646, 444 (1999). 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00650-2
16. However, in the low-energy limit, the odd-parity channel is subleading in the atom-dimer scattering and the even-parity channel exhibiting no Efimov effect is dominant.
17. P. F. Bedaque, E. Braaten, and H. W. Hammer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 908 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.908
18. E. Braaten and H. W. Hammer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 160407 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160407
19. E. Nielsen and J. H. Macek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1566 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1566
20. B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1751 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1751
21. E. Braaten and H. W. Hammer, Phys. Rep. 428, 259 (2006) 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.001
22. E. Braaten and H. W. Hammer, Ann. Phys. 322, 120 (2007). 10.1016/j.aop.2006.10.011
23. This exponent is given by 6+2γ, where γ=-0.804 is the scaling exponent of three-body wave function in the p -wave channel found, for example, in Ref.