Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 599-608

  Torloni, M R ^a   Vedmedovska, N ^b   Merialdi, M ^c   Betran A P ^c   Allen, T ^d   Gonzalez R ^e   Platt, L D ^f  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b RIGA STRADINS UNIVERSITY   (Latvia)

^c Department of Reproductive Health and Research ^*

^d WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^e Ministerio de Salud de Chile   (Chile)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adverse effects; Diagnostic imaging; Diagnostic techniques; Fetus; Obstetric and gynecological; Pregnancy; Prenatal; Prenatal injuries; Safety; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD GROWTH; CHILDHOOD; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTRONICS; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; INTELLECT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL DISEASE; META ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL PERIOD; PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SAFETY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 66249123607     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.6328     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Stratmeyer ME. Effects on animals. In An Overview of Ultrasound: Theory, Measurement, Medical Applications, and Biological Effects, Stewart HF, Stratmeyer ME (eds). HHS Publication: Rockville, MD, 1982; 77-102.
2. Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin MA, Mugford M, Nielson J, Roberts T. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth 2002; 29: 225-250.
3. Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: i-vi, 1-193.
4. Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Is ultrasound unsound? A review of epidemiological studies of human exposure to ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 293-298.
5. Salvesen KA. Epidemiological prenatal ultrasound studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93: 295-300.
6. World Health Organization. WHO Multicentre Study for the Development of Growth Standards from Fetal Life to Childhood: the Fetal Component. Geneva: WHO, 2009 (HRP Project No. A65097).
7. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews for Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester.
8. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Metaanalysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012.
9. Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 32.
10. Gülmezoglu AM, Say L, Betrán AP, Villar J, Piaggio G. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 16.
11. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412.
12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e296.
13. Normand SL. Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med 1999; 18: 321-359.
14. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188.
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG.Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558.
16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560.
17. Stark CR, Orleans M, Haverkamp AD, Murphy J. Short- and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 194-200.
18. Moore RM Jr, Diamond EL, Cavalieri RL. The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 513-517.
19. Grisso JA, Strom BL, Cosmatos I, Tolosa J, Main D, Carson J. Diagnostic ultrasound in pregnancy and low birthweight. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 297-301.
20. Tikkanen J, Heinonen OP. Congenital heart disease in the offspring and maternal habits and home exposures during pregnancy. Teratology 1992; 46: 447-454.
21. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, cNellis D. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 821-827.
22. Fu S, Bao Y, Zhang J, Hu Y, Wang X, Zhang F. [Effects of B-ultrasonic radiation during pregnancy on reproductive outcome]. [Chinese]. Chung-Hua Yu Fang i Hsueh Tsa Chih [Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine] 2000; 34: 86-88.
23. Hellman LM, Duffus GM, Donald I, Sunden B. Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics. Lancet 1970; 1: 1133-1134.
24. Macdonald W, Newnham J, Gurrin L, Evans S. Effect of frequent prenatal ultrasound on birthweight: follow up at 1 year of age. Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Working Group. Lancet 1996; 348: 482.
25. Evans S, Newnham J, Macdonald W, Hall C. Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations. Early Hum Dev 1996; 45: 203-214.
26. Newnham JP, Evans SF, Michael CA, Stanley FJ, Landau LI. Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1993; 342: 887-891.
27. Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, Zubrick SR, Landau LL, Stanley FJ. Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 2038-2044.
28. Salvesen KA, Jacobsen G, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Bakketeig LS. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent growth during childhood. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 6-10.
29. Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M, Cheang M. In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up. Radiology 1988; 166: 687-690.
30. Salvesen KA, Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Undheim JO, Okland O. Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8-9 years. Lancet 1992; 339: 85-89.
31. Kieler H, Ahlsten G, Haglund B, Salvesen K, Axelsson O. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent neurologic development. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91(5 Pt 1): 750-756.
32. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH. Routine ultrasonography in utero and speech development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 101-103.
33. Campbell JD, Elford RW, Brant RF. Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal 1993; 149: 1435-1440.
34. Bunin GR, Buckley JD, Boesel CP, Rorke LB, Meadows AT. Risk factors for astrocytic glioma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the brain in young children: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994; 3: 197-204.
35. Cartwright RA, McKinney PA, Hopton PA, Birch JM, Hartley AL, Mann JR, Waterhouse JA, Johnston HE, Draper GJ, Stiller C. Ultrasound examinations in pregnancy and childhood cancer. Lancet 1984; 2: 999-1000.
36. Kinnier Wilson LM, Waterhouse JA. Obstetric ultrasound and childhood malignancies. Lancet 1984; 2: 997-999.
37. Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnattingius S, Hall P, Ekbom A. Prenatal ultrasound examinations and risk of childhood leukaemia: case-control study. BMJ 2000; 320: 282-283.
38. Shu XO, Jin F, Linet MS, Zheng W, Clemens J, Mills J, Gao YT. Diagnostic X-ray and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer 1994; 70: 531-536.
39. Shu XO, Potter JD, Linet MS, Severson RK, Han D, Kersey JH, Neglia JP, Trigg ME, Robison LL. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 177-185.
40. Sorahan T, Lancashire R, Stewart A, Peck I. Pregnancy ultrasound and childhood cancer: a second report from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 831-832.
41. Stålberg K, Haglund B, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Pfeifer S, Kieler H. Prenatal ultrasound and the risk of childhood brain tumour and its subtypes. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 1285-1287.
42. Kieler H, Haglund B, Cnattingius S, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Does prenatal sonography affect intellectual performance? Epidemiology 2005; 16: 304-310.
43. Stålberg K, Haglund B, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Hultman CM, Kieler H. Prenatal ultrasound scanning and the risk of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 577-582.
44. Davies JA, Gallivan S, Spencer JA. Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Lancet 1992; 340: 1299-1303.
45. A randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound velocimetry of the umbilical artery in low risk pregnancies. Doppler rench Study Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 419-424.
46. Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S. Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 130-133.
47. Omtzigt AM, Reuwer PJ, Bruinse HW. A randomized controlled trial on the clinical value of umbilical Doppler velocimetry in antenatal care.AmJObstetGynecol 1994; 170: 625-634.
48. Wladimiroff JW, Laar J. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal body size. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1980; 59: 177-179.
49. Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Ultrasound during pregnancy and subsequent childhood non-right handedness: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 241-246.
50. Kieler H, Axelsson O, Haglund B, Nilsson S, Salvesen KA. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent handedness. Early Hum Dev 1998; 50: 233-245.
51. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Hugdahl K, Bakketeig LS. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ 1993; 307: 159-164.
52. Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Ultrasound during pregnancy and birthweight, childhood malignancies and neurological development. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1025-1031.
53. Crowther CA, Kornman L, O'Callaghan S, George K, Furness M, Willson K. Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 1273-1279.
54. Geerts LT, Brand EJ, Theron GB. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome - a prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 501-507.
55. Secher NJ, Hansen PK, Lenstrup C, Eriksen PS. Controlled trial of ultrasound screening for light for gestational age (LGA) infants in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 23: 307-313.
56. Smith CB. Birth weights of fetuses exposed to diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 395-396.
57. Pizzarello DJ. Teratogenic effects of ionizing radiations and ultrasound. Prog Clin Biol Res 1980; 44: 67-76.
58. Henderson J, Willson K, Jago JR, Whittingham TA. A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 699-705.
59. Miller MW, Brayman AA, Abramowicz JS. Obstetric ultrasonography: a biophysical consideration of patient safety - the "rules" have changed. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 241-254.
60. Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Ultrasound and adverse effects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 102-103.
61. Ziskin MC. Intrauterine effects of ultrasound: human epidemiology. Teratology 1999; 59: 252-260.
62. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging in Pregnancy. In: Public Health Service NIH (ed.). NIH Publication: Washington, 1984; 12-13.
63. Ziskin MC. Update on the safety of ultrasound in obstetrics. Semin Roentgenol 1990; 25: 294-298.
64. Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G, Ulstein MK, Brodtkorb CJ, Balstad P, Eriksen BC, Jörgensen NP. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 207-211.
65. Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Aure JC, Ulstein M. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1984; 1: 1347.
66. Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA, Okland O, Vatten LJ. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 473-478.
67. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Jacobsen G, Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Molne K. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent vision and hearing at primary school age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 243-247.
68. Kieler H, Haglund B, Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent growth, vision and hearing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1267-1272.
69. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Eklund G, Fall O, Lindeberg S, Sjödin Y. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2: 585-588.
70. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S. Ultrasonic dating of pregnancies: effect on incidence of SGA diagnoses. A randomised controlled trial. Early Hum Dev 1992; 30: 75-79.
71. Kieler H, Hellberg D, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O. Pregnancy outcome among non-participants in a trial on ultrasound screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 104-109.
72. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. [See comment]. Lancet 1990; 336: 387-391.
73. Saari-Kemppainen A. Use of antenatal care services in a controlled ultrasound screening trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 12-14.
74. LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Ewigman BG, Frigoletto FD, Crane JP, McNellis D. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on maternal management and outcome. RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) Study Group. [See comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 483-489.
75. Duff GB. A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population f ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 374-378.
76. Ewigman B, LeFevre M, Hesser J. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 189-194.
77. McKenna D, Tharmaratnam S, Mahsud S, Bailie C, Harper A, Dornan J. A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 626-632.
78. Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Sinistrality- a side-effect of prenatal sonography: a comparative study of young men. Epidemiology 2001; 12: 618-623.
79. Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Palmgren J, Haglund B, Axelsson O. First trimester ultrasound scans and left-handedness. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 370.
80. Bellieni CV, Buonocore G, Bagnoli F, Cordelli DM, Gasparre O, Calonaci F, Filardi G, Merola A, Petraglia F. Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth? Early Hum Dev 2005; 81: 689-693.
81. Sylvan K, Ryding EL, Rydhstroem H. Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 1154-1158.
82. Belfrage P, Fernstrom I, Hallenberg G. Routine or selective ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 747-750.
83. Geerts L, Theron AM, Grove D, Theron GB, Odendaal HJ. A community-based obstetric ultrasound service. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 23-31.
84. Cochlin DL. Effects of two ultrasound scanning regimens on he management of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 885-890.
85. Pastore LM, Hertz-Picciotto I, Beaumont JJ. Risk of stillbirth from medications, illnesses and medical procedures. [See comment]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999; 13: 421-430.
86. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr 1967; 71: 181-191.