Sensitivity of feedback-enhanced mri contrast to macroscopic and microscopic field variations

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 925-936

  Huang, Susie Y ^a,b   Yang, Sophia S ^a   Lin, Yung Ya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback enhanced magnetic resonance; Radiation damping; Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; Susceptibility contrast

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; DAMPING; IRON METALLOGRAPHY; IRON OXIDES; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; RADIATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPERPARAMAGNETISM; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION;

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEEDBACK INTERACTION; FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS; FREQUENCY VARIATION; MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC; RADIATION DAMPING; RESONANCE FREQUENCIES; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLES;

NONLINEAR FEEDBACK;

ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MICROSCOPE IMAGE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 66249101953     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21584     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, Kennedy DN, Hoppel BE, Cohen MS, Turner R. Cheng HM, Brady TJ, Rosen BR. Dynamic magnetic-resonance-imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:5675-5679.
2. Ogawa S. Tank DW, Menon R. Ellermann JM, Kim SG, Merkle H. Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation - functional brain mapping with magnetic-resonance-imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:5951-5955.
3. Bulte JWM, Kraitchman DL. Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed 2004;17:484-499.
4. Haacke EM, Xu YB, Cheng YCN, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612-618.
5. Scheffler K. Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2409-2418.
6. Ernst RR, Anderson WA. Application of Fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance. Rev Sci Instrum 1966;37:93-102.
7. Kennan RP, Zhong JH, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:9-21.
8. Boxerman JL, Bandettini PA, Kwong KK, Baker JR, Davis TL, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. The intravascular contribution to FMRI signal change - Monte-Carlo modeling and diffusion-weighted studies in-vivo. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:4-10.
9. Zhong JH, Kennan RP, Fulbright RK, Gore JC. Quantification of intravascular and extravascular contributions to BOLD effects induced by alteration in oxygenation or intravascular contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:526-536.
10. Faber C. Heil C. Zahneisen B. Balla DZ, Bowtell R. Sensitivity to local dipole fields in the CRAZED experiment: an approach to bright spot MRI. J Magn Reson 2006;182:315-324.
11. Sorensen AG. Magnetic resonance as a cancer imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3274-3281.
12. Huang SY, Wolahan SM, Mathern GM, Chute DJ, Akhtari M. Nguyen ST, Huynh MN, Salamon N. Lin YY. Improving MRI differentiation of gray and white matter in epileptogenic lesions based on nonlinear feedback. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:776-786.
13. Datta S. Huang SY, Lin YY. Contrast enhancement by feedback fields in magnetic resonance imaging. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:22071-22078.
14. Bloembergen N. Pound RV. Radiation damping in magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954;95:8-12.
15. Warren WS, Hammes SL, Bates JL. Dynamics of radiation damping in nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 1989;91:5895-5904.
16. Augustine MP. Transient properties of radiation damping. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2002;40:111-150.
17. Chen JH, Jerschow A. Bodenhausen G. Compensation of radiation damping during selective pulses in NMR spectroscopy. Compensation of radiation damping during selective pulses in NMR spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett 1999;308:397-402.
18. Vlassenbroek A. Jeener J. Broekaert P. Radiation damping in high resolution liquid NMR: a simulation study. J Chem Phys 1995;103: 5886-5897.
19. Huang SY, Anklin C. Walls JD, Lin YY. Sizable concentration-dependent frequency shifts in solution NMR using sensitive probes. J Am Chem Soc 2004; 126:15936-15937.
20. Black RD, Early TA, Roemer PB, Mueller OM, Mogrocampero A. Turner LG, Johnson GA. A high-temperature superconducting receiver for nuclear-magnetic- resonance microscopy. Science 1993;259:793-795.
21. Broekaert P. Jeener J. Suppression of radiation damping in NMR in liquids by active electronic feedback, J Magn Reson A 1995;113:60-64.
22. Abergel D. Louis-Joseph A. Lallemand J.-Y. Amplification of radiation damping in a 600-MHz NMR spectrometer: application to the study of water-protein interactions. J Biomol NMR 1996;8:15-22.
23. 2† measurement in the human occipital lobe at 4T and 7T by Carr-Purcell MRI: detection of microscopic susceptibility contrast. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:742-750.
24. Huang SY, Anklin C. Walls JD, Lin YY. Sizable concentration-dependent frequency shifts in solution NMR using sensitive probes. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:15936-15937.
25. Warren WS, Richter W. Andreotti AH, Farmer BT. Generation of impossible cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in solution NMR. Science 1993;262:2005-2009.
26. Warren WS, Ahn S. Mescher M. Garwood M. Ugurbil K. Richter W. Rizi RR, Hopkins J. Leigh JS. MR imaging contrast enhancement based on intermolecular zero quantum coherences. Science 1998;281:247-251.
27. Lin YY, Lisitza N. Ahn S. Warren WS. Resurrection of crushed magnetization and chaotic dynamics in solution NMR spectroscopy. Science 2000;290:118-121.
28. Huang SY, Furuyama JK, Lin YY. Designing feedback-based contrast enhancement for in vivo imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phys 2006;19: 333-346.
29. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1999.
30. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:749-763.