Ease of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion and its fibreoptic view after placement using Gum Elastic Bougie: A comparison with conventional techniques

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 435-440

  Taneja, S ^b   Agarwal, M ^a   Dali, J S ^b   Agrawal, G ^b  

^a LOK NAYAK HOSPITAL   (India)

^b V 230 ^*

Author keywords

Gum Elastic Bougie; Insertion; ProSeal LMA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BOUGIE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; HUMAN; INJURY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 66249101619     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0903700306     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C, judd DV. Gum Elastic Bougie guided insertion of Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004;100:25-29.
2. Howarth A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum Elastic Bougie guided insertion of Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30:624-627. (Pubitemid 35189864)
3. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61:211-216. (Pubitemid 18186054)
4. Brimacombe JR. Placement Phase. In: Brimacombe JR, Laryngeal mask anesthesia: principles and practice, 2nd ed. London: Saunders Elsevier. 2005. p. 206.
5. Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:457. (Pubitemid 23085774)
6. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1269-1277. (Pubitemid 36520216)
7. Brimacombe JR. Proseal LMA for ventilation and airway protection. In: Brimacombe jR, Laryngeal mask anesthesia: principles and practice, 2nd ed. London: Saunders Elsevier 2005. p. 505.
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A. Gastric insufflation with the Proseal laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:1614-1615. (Pubitemid 32493194)
9. Kadry M, Popat M. Pharyngeal wall perforation: An unusual complication of blind intubation with a gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:404-405. (Pubitemid 29155028)
10. Brimacombe J, Howarth A, Keller C. A more "failsafe" approach to difficult intubation with a gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:292.
11. Brimacombe j, Keller C. The proseal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:104-109.
12. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:824-827. (Pubitemid 34618960)
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20:65-69. (Pubitemid 36077105)
14. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, King JA, Roux P, Bennett P et al. The proseal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:534-539. (Pubitemid 34285204)
15. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:527-533. (Pubitemid 34285203)
16. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:527-533. (Pubitemid 34285203)