Value-based arguments in the dictator game

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-08-09, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-6

  Atkinson, Katie ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPECTED UTILITY; EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS; FRAMING EFFECTS; GAIN INSIGHT; SOCIAL VALUES; VALUE-BASED;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 66149188257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Atkinson, K., and Bench-Capon, T. 2007. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15):855-874.
2. Atkinson, K. 2005. What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK.
3. Bardsley, N. 2007. Dictator game giving: Altruism or artefact. Experimental Economics. In press. Available through Online First.
4. Bearden, J. N. 2001. Ultimatum bargaining experiments: The state of the art. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=626183.
5. Bench-Capon, T.; Doutre, S.; and Dunne, P. 2006. Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Aritificial Intelligence 171:42-71.
6. Bench-Capon, T. 2003. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3):429-448.
7. Bolton, G. E.; Katok, E.; and Zwick, R. 1998. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. International Journal of Game Theory 27:226-299.
8. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77:321-357.
9. Forsythe, R.; Horowitz, J. L.; Savin, N. E.; and Sefton, M. 1994. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6(3):347-369.
10. Searle, J. R. 2001. Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
11. Walton, D. N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Wooldridge, M., and van der Hoek, W. 2005. On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. Journal of Applied Logic 3:396-420.