Comparison of hydrodynamic models of different complexities to model floods with emergency storage areas

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 4695-4709

  Chatterjee, Chandranath ^a   Förster, Saskia ^b   Bronstert, Axel ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

1D 2D model; 1D model; Emergency storage area; Flood; Hydrodynamic models

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL TIME; DIFFERENT RESOLUTIONS; DISCHARGE REDUCTIONS; DOWNSTREAM AREAS; EMERGENCY STORAGES; EXTREME FLOOD EVENTS; HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL; HYDRODYNAMIC MODELLING;

FLOOD CONTROL; HYDRODYNAMICS; RIVERS; WATER LEVELS;

FLOODS;

EID: 66149186697     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7079     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aureli F, Maranzoni A, Mignosa P, Ziveri C. 2005. Flood hazard mapping by means of fully-2D and quasi-2D numerical modelling: a case study. In Floods, from Defence to Management, Van Alphen J, van Beek E and Taal M (eds). Taylor & Francis: London; 389-399.
2. Baptist MJ, Haasnoot M, Cornelissen P, Icke J, van der Wedden G, de Vriend H, Gugic G. 2006. Flood detention, nature development and water quality in a detention area along the lowland river Sava, Coratia. Hydrobiologia 565: 243-257.
3. Bates PD, Lane SN, Ferguson RI. 2005. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
4. Chow VT. 1959. Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill: New York.
5. DHI. 1997. MIKE11 GIS Reference and User Manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Horsholm, Denmark.
6. DHI. 2000. MIKE 21 User Guide. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Horsholm: Denmark.
7. DHI. 2004. MIKEFLOOD 1D-2D Modelling User Manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Horsholm, Denmark.
8. Dhondia Z, Stelling G. 2002. Application of one-dimensional-twodimensional integrated hydraulic model for flood simulation and damage assessment. International Conference on Hydroinformatics, UK, Vol. 5; 265-276.
9. Faganello E, Attewill L. 2005. Flood management strategy for the upper and middle Odra river basin: feasibility study of raciborz reservoir. Natural Hazards 36: 273-295.
10. Förster S, Chatterjee C, Bronstert A. 2008. Hydrodynamic simulation of the operational management of a proposed flood emergency storage area at the Middle Elbe River. River Research and Applications, (In press).
11. Fread DL, Lewis JM, Carroll TR, Rost AA, Ingram J. 1998. Improving real-time hydrologic services in USA, Part II: Inundation mapping using dynamic streamflow modelling. British Hydrological Society International Symposium on Hydrology in a Changing Environment, UK, July 6-10, 1998.
12. Hesselink AW, Stelling GS, Kwadijk JCJ, Middelkoop H. 2003. Inundation of a Dutch river polder, sensitivity analysis of a physically based inundation model using historic data. Water Resources Research 39(9): 1234, DOI:10D1029/2002WR001334.
13. Horritt MS. 2005. Parameterisation, validation and uncertainty analysis of CFD models of fluvial and flood hydraulics in the natural environment. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics, Bates PD, Lane SN, Ferguson RI (eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 193-213.
14. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2001. Predicting floodplain inundation: rasterbased modelling versus the finite-element approach. Hydrological Processes 15: 825-842.
15. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2002. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 268: 87-99.
16. Huang S, Rauberg H, Apel H, Lindenschmidt KE. 2007. The effectiveness of polder systems on peak discharge capping of floods along the middle reaches of the Elbe River in Germany. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4: 211-241.
17. Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). 2002. HEC-RAS River Analysis System, User's Manual, Version 3D1. US Army Corps of Engineers: Davis, California.
18. IWK (Institut f̈ur Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturtechnik). 2003. Untersuchung von Hochwasserretentionsmaßnahmen entlang der Elbe im Bereich der Landkreise Wittenberg und Anhalt-Zerbst (in German). Universität Karlsruhe.
19. King IP, Donnell BP, Letter JV, McAnally WH, Thomas WA, LaHatte C. 2001. User's Guide for RMA2 Version 4D5. http://chl.wes. army.mil/softwar e/tabs/docs.htp.
20. Ḱuzniar P, Popek Z, Zelazo J. 2002. The analysis of possibility of flood risk decreasing on the Middle Vistula River reach. 5th International Conference on Hydro -Science & -Engineering, Warsaw. http://kfki.baw.de/conferences/ICHE/2002-Warsaw/ARTICLES/PDF/ 185C2.pdf.
21. Minh Thu PT. 2002. A hydrodynamic-numeric model of the river Rhine. Dissertation. University of Karlsruhe.
22. O'Brien JS. 2006. FLO-2D: Users Manual Version 2006D01. http://www. flo-2d.com/v2006/Documentation/Manual Main 2006.pdf.
23. Rungo M, Olesen KW. 2003. Combined 1- and 2-dimensional flood modelling. 4th Iranian Hydraulic Conference, 21-23 Oct, Shiraz, Iran.
24. Stelling G, Duinmeijer S. 2003. A staggered conservative scheme for every froude number in rapidly varied shallow water flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 43: 1329-1354.
25. Tayefi V, Lane SN, Hardy RJ, Yu D. 2007. A comparison of oneand two-dimensional approaches to modelling flood inundation over complex upland floodplains. Hydrological Processes 21: 3190-3202.
26. Werner M. 2001. Impact of grid size in GIS based flood extent mapping using a 1-D flow model. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 26: 517-522.
27. Werner M. 2004. Spatial flood extent modelling-A performance based comparison. PhD thesis, Delft University, Netherlands.
28. Werner MGF, Hunter NM, Bates PD. 2005. Identifiability of distributed floodplain roughness values in flood extent estimation. Journal of Hydrology 314: 139-157.