Cooperative active perception using POMDPs

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-08-01, Issue , 2008, Pages 49-54

  Spaan, Matthijs T I ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SENSOR; DECISION-THEORETIC; FIXED CAMERAS; INTEGRATED DECISION; LOCAL SENSORS; PARTIALLY OBSERVABLE MARKOV DECISION PROCESS; SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS;

CAMERAS; MARKOV PROCESSES; ROBOTS; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SENSORS;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 66149173546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bernstein, D. S.; Givan, R.; Immerman, N.; and Zilber-stein, S. 2002. The complexity of decentralized control of Markov decision processes. Mathematics of Operations Research 27(4):819-840.
2. Boger, J.; Poupart, P.; Hoey, J.; Boutilier, C.; Fernie, G.; and Mihailidis, A. 2005. A decision-theoretic approach to task assistance for persons with dementia. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
3. Darrell, T., and Pentland, A. 1996. Active gesture recognition using partially observable Markov decision processes. In Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition.
4. Emery-Montemerlo, R.; Gordon, G.; Schneider, J.; and Thran, S. 2005. Game theoretic control for robot teams. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
5. Fern, A.; Natarajan, S.; Judah, K.; and Tadepalli, P. 2007. A decision-theoretic model of assistance. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
6. Guo, A. 2003. Decision-theoretic active sensing for autonomous agents. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems.
7. Hauskrecht, M. 2000. Value function approximations for partially observable Markov decision processes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 13:33-95.
8. Ji, S., and Carin, L. 2007. Cost-sensitive feature acquisition and classification. Pattern Recognition 40(5): 1474-1485.
9. Ji, S.; Parr, R.; and Carin, L. 2007. Non-myopic multi-aspect sensing with partially observable Markov decision processes. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 55(6):2720-2730.
10. Kaelbling, L. P.; Littman, M. L.; and Cassandra, A. R. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101:99-134.
11. Littman, M. L.; Cassandra, A. R.; and Kaelbling, L. P. 1995. Learning policies for partially observable environments: Scaling up. In International Conference on Machine Learning.
12. Oliehoek, F. A.; Spaan, M. T. J.; Whiteson, S.; and Vlassis, N. 2008. Exploiting locality of interaction in factored Dec-POMDPs. In Proc. of Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems.
13. Oliehoek, F. A.; Spaan, M. T. J.; and Vlassis, N. 2008. Optimal and approximate Q-value functions for decentralized POMDPs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.
14. Pineau, J.; Montemerlo, M.; Pollack, M.; Roy, N.; and Thrun, S. 2003. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4):271-281.
15. Porta, J. M.; Vlassis, N.; Spaan, M. T. J.; and Poupart, P. 2006. Point-based value iteration for continuous POMDPs. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7:2329-2367.
16. Ross, S., and Chaib-draa, B. 2007. AEMS: An anytime online search algorithm for approximate policy refinement in large POMDPs. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
17. Roth, M.; Simmons, R.; and Veloso, M. 2007. Exploiting factored representations for decentralized execution in multi-agent teams. In Proc. of Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems.
18. Roy, N.; Gordon, G.; and Thrun, S. 2003. Planning under uncertainty for reliable health care robotics. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Field and Service Robotics.
19. Roy, N.; Gordon, G.; and Thran, S. 2005. Finding approximate POMDP solutions through belief compression. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 23:1-40.
20. Sanfeliu, A., and Andrade-Cetto, J. 2006. Ubiquitous networking robotics in urban settings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ IROS Workshop on Network Robot Systems.
21. Satia, J. K., and Lave, R. E. 1973. Markovian decision processes with probabilistic observation of states. Management Science 20(1):1-13.
22. Seuken, S., and Zilberstein, S. 2008. Formal models and algorithms for decentralized decision making under uncertainty. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.
23. Simmons, R., and Koenig, S. 1995. Probabilistic robot navigation in partially observable environments. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
24. Spaan, M. T. J., and Melo, F. S. 2008. Interaction-driven Markov games for decentralized multiagent planning under uncertainty. In Proc. of Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems.
25. Spaan, M. T. J., and Vlassis, N. 2005. Perseus: Randomized point-based value iteration for POMDPs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24:195-220.
26. Stone, P.; Sridharan, M.; Stronger, D.; Kuhlmann, G.; Kohl, N.; Fidelman, P.; and Jong, N. K. 2006. From pixels to multi-robot decision-making: A study in uncertainty. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54(11):933-943.
27. Varakantham, P.; Marecki, J.; Yabu, Y.; Tambe, M.; and Yokoo, M. 2007. Letting loose a SPIDER on a network of POMDPs: Generating quality guaranteed policies. In Proc. of Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems.
28. Vlassis, N.; Gordon, G.; and Pineau, J. 2006. Planning under uncertainty in robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54(11). Special issue.
29. Vogel, J., and Murphy, K. 2007. A non-myopic approach to visual search. In Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision.