Rapid decline of Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorusparasitism in Red-backed Shrikes Lanius collurio

Ardea

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-22

  Adamík, Peter ^a,b   Hušek, Jan ^c   Cepák, Jaroslav ^d  

^a Museum of Natural History   (Czech Republic)

^b PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bird ringing; Brood parasitism; Common Cuckoo; Long term study; Red backed Shrike

Indexed keywords

BIRD; BROOD PARASITISM; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION SIZE; SPATIAL VARIATION; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE; SLOVAKIA;

AVES; CUCULIDAE; CUCULUS; CUCULUS CANORUS; LANIIDAE; LANIUS; LANIUS COLLURIO;

EID: 66149173410     PISSN: 03732266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5253/078.097.0103     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alvarez F. 2003. Parasitism rate by the Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus increases with high density of host's breeding pairs. Ornis Fenn. 80:193-196.
2. Baillie S.R. 2001. The contribution of ringing to the conservation and management of bird populations: a review. Ardea 89: 167-184.
3. Bairlein F. 2003. The study of bird migrations -some future perspectives. Bird Study 50: 243-253.
4. Benecke H.G. 1982. Zur Bedeutung verschiedener Wirtsvogelarten für die Reproduktion des Kuckucks in der DDR. Falke 29:153-155.
5. Brooke M. de L. & Davies N.B. 1987. Recent changes in host usage by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 56:873-883.
6. Brooke M. de L. & Davies N.B. 1988. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335: 630-632.
7. Brooke M. de L., Davies N.B. & Noble D.G. 1998. Rapid decline of host defences in response to reduced cuckoo parasitism: behavioural flexibility of reed warblers in a changing world. Proc. R. Soc. London B 265:1277-1282.
8. Crick H.Q.P. & Baillie S.R. 1996. A review of the BTO's nest record scheme. Its value to the JNCC and Country Agencies, and its methodology. BTO Res. Rep. 159. BTO, Thetford.
9. Čapek V. 1896. Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsgeschichte des Kuckucks. Ornithologisches Jahrbuch 7: 41-72,147-157.
10. Čapek V. 1902. Meine Kuckucksfunde im Jahre 1902. Zeitschrift für Oologie 12: 75-76.
11. Čapek V. 1903. Meine Kuckucksfunde in der Saison 1903. Zeitschrift für Oologie 13:105-106.
12. Čapek V. 1910. Einiges über die Fortpflanzungsgeschichte des Kuckucks aus Mähren. Berichte 5 Int. Ornithol. Kongress Berlin: 579-582.
13. HoláŇ V. & Sviečka J. 1996. Proportion of occurrence of young common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) in the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) nests in the Czech Republic. Sylvia 32: 136-141. (in Czech)
14. HoláŇ V. 2004. Ten years of the Czech Shrike Working Group. Zprávy ǦSO 58: 15-18. (in Czech)
15. Honza M., Moksnes A., Røskaft E. & Stokke B.G. 2001. How are different Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg morphs maintained? An evaluation of different hypotheses. Ardea 89: 341-352.
16. Hušek J. & Adamík P. 2006. Ringing of red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) nestlings in the Czech Republic. Sylvia 42: 38-48. (in Czech)
17. Hušek J. & Adamík P. 2008. Long-term trends in the timing of breeding and brood size in the Red-backed Shrike (Lanius collurio) in the Czech Republic, 1964-2004. J. Ornithol. 149: 97-103.
18. Lindholm A.K. 1999. Brood parasitism by the cuckoo on patchy reed warbler populations in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 293-309.
19. Lovászi P. & Moskát C. 2004. Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour 141: 245-262.
20. Makatsch W. 1955. Der Brutparasitismus in der Vogelwelt. Neumann Verlag, Radebeul & Berlin.
21. Moksnes A. & Røskaft E. 1995. Egg morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J. Zool. 236: 625-648.
22. Moskát C. & Fuisz T.I. 1999. Reactions of red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio to artificial cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs. J. Avian Biol. 30: 175-181.
23. Moskát C. 2005. Common Cuckoo parasitism in Europe: behavioural adaptations, arms race and the role of metapopulations. Ornithol. Sci. 4: 3-15.
24. Reif J.,Voříšek P., št'astný K. & Bejček V. 2006. Population trends of birds in the Czech Republic during 1982-2005. Sylvia 42: 22-37. (in Czech)
25. Rey E. 1897. Beobachtungen über den Kuckuck bei Leipzig in den Jahren 1895 bis 1896. J. Ornithol. 45: 349-359.
26. Soler M., Soler J.J., Martinez J.G., Pérez-Contreras T. & Møller A.P. 1998. Micro-evolutionary change and population dynamics of a brood parasite and its primary host: the intermittent arms race hypothesis. Oecologia 117: 381-390.
27. Soler J.J., Møller A.E & Soler M. 1999. A comparative study of host selection in the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Oecologia 118: 265-276.
28. Stokke B.G., Hafstad I., Rudolfsen G., Bargain B., Beier J., Campàs D.B., Dyrcz A., Honza M., Leisler B., Pap P.L., Patapavicius R., Procházka P., Schulze-Hagen K., Thomas R., Moksnes A., Møller A.P., Røskaft E. & Soler M. 2007. Host density predicts presence of cuckoo parasitism in reed warblers. Oikos 116: 913-922.
29. Štand F. & Štanclová H. 1987. Ptactvo Pardubicka-Bohdanečsko. Krajské muzeum východních Čecil, Pardubice.
30. Takasu E, Kawasaki K., Nakamura H., Cohen J. & Shigesada N. 1993. Modeling the population dynamics of a cuckoo-host association and the evolution of host defenses. Am. Nat. 142: 819-839.
31. Wenzel K. 1908. Zur Naturgeschichte des Kuckucks und seiner Brutpfleger. Ornithol. Monatsschr. 33: 462-475, 494-501.