Numerical and dietary responses of a predator community in a temperate zone of Europe

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 277-290

  Dupuy, Gilles ^a   Giraudoux, Patrick ^b   Delattre, Pierre ^c  

^a Office National des Forets   (France)

^b université Bourgogne Franche Comté   (France)

^c CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CARNIVORE; DIET; DOMINANCE; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; NUMERICAL METHOD; POPULATION CYCLE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; RODENT; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; WOODLAND;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

APODEMUS; FELIS CATUS; LAGOMORPHA; LEPUS; MAMMALIA; MARTES; MICROTUS ARVALIS; MURIDAE; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; RODENTIA; VULPES VULPES;

EID: 66149167605     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.04930.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersson, M. Erlinge, S. 1977. Influence of predation on rodent population Oikos 29 : 591 597.
2. Ashby, K. R. 1967. Studies on ecology of field mice and voles (Apodemus sylvaticus, Clethrionomys glareolus and Microtus agrestis) in Houghland Wood, Durham J. Zool. Lond. 152 : 389 513.
3. Banach, A. 1987. Small rodent communities in a complex of forest biotopes Acta Theriol. 32 : 229 244.
4. Bergerud, A. 1984. Changement de proie dans un écosystème simple Pour la Science. 76 : 76 85.
5. Burnham, K. P. Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer.
6. Day, M. G. 1966. Identification of hair and feather remains in the gut and faeces of stoats and weasels J. Zool. Lond. 148 : 201 217.
7. Debrot, S. et al. 1982. Atlas des poils de mammifères d'Europe. Inst. de Zoologie de l'Université de Neuchâtel.
8. Delattre, P. 1983. Analyse d'une relation proie-prédateur pour le modèle micromammifères-petits mustélidés en milieu de type agroécosystème. Méthode d'évaluation de la pression de prédation exercée Acta Oecol. Oecol. Gen. 4 : 179 191.
9. Delattre, P. 1984. Influence de la pression de prédation exercée par une population de belettes (Mustela nivalis L.) sur un peuplement de microtidé Acta Oecol. Oecol. Gen. 5 : 285 300.
10. Delattre, P. et al. 1990. Recherche d'un indicateur de la cinétique démographique des populations du campagnol des champs (Microtus arvalis) Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 45 : 375 384.
11. Delattre, P. et al. 1992. Land use patterns and types of common vole (Microtus arvalis) population kinetics Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 39 : 153 169. (Pubitemid 23398929)
12. Delattre, P. et al. 1999. Vole outbreaks in a landscape context: evidence from a six year study of Microtus arvalis Landscape Ecol. 14 : 401 412. (Pubitemid 29365587)
13. Erlinge, S. et al. 1983. Predation as a regulating factor on small rodent populations in southern Sweden Oikos 40 : 36 52. (Pubitemid 13287030)
14. Erlinge, S. et al. 1984. Can vertebrate predators regulate their prey? Am. Nat. 123 : 125 133. (Pubitemid 15272163)
15. Faliu, L. et al. 1979. Etude en microscopie optique des poils (pili) de la faune pyrénéenne sauvage en vue de leur détermination Anat. Histol. Embryol. 8 : 307 317. (Pubitemid 10187828)
16. Giraudoux, P. 2006. pgirmess: data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.3.4 .
17. Hanski, I. Tiainen, J. 1988. Populations and communities in changing agro-ecosystems in Finland Ecol. Bull. 39 : 159 168.
18. Hanski, I. et al. 1991. Specialist predators, generalist predators and the microtine rodent cycle J. Anim. Ecol. 60 : 353 367.
19. Hanski, I. et al. 2001. Small-rodent dynamics and predation Ecology 82 : 1505 1520. (Pubitemid 32614626)
20. Hansson, L. 1993. Spatial dynamics in relation to density variations of rodents in a forest landscape Mammalia 57 : 632.
21. Hansson, L. 1995. Development and application of landscape approaches in mammalian ecology Lidicker, W. Z. J. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. Univ. of Minnesota Press 20 39.
22. Hansson, L. 2002. Rodent dynamics, population regulation and predation in changeable landscapes: importance for Echinococcus transmission Craig, P. Pawlowski, Z. Cestode zoonoses: echinococcosis and cysticercosis. IOS Press 267 285.
23. Hansson, L. Henttonen, H. 1985. Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover Oecologia 67 : 394 402. (Pubitemid 17246201)
24. Hansson, L. Henttonen, H. 1988. Rodent dynamics as community processes Trends Ecol. Evol. 3 : 195 200.
25. Henttonen, H. 1986. Causes and geographic patterns of microtine cycles Ph.D. thesis, Dept of Zoology, Univ. of Helsinki.
26. Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly Can. Entomol. 21 : 293 320.
27. Keller, A. 1981. Détermination des mammifères de la Suisse par leur pelage. Lagomorpha, Rodentia Rev. Suisse Zool. 85 : 758 761.
28. Klemola, T. T. et al. 2002. Specialist and generalist natural enemies as an explanation for geographical gradients in population cycles of northern herbivores Oikos 99 : 83 94.
29. Korpimäki, E. et al. 2002. Dynamic effects of predators on cyclic voles: field experimentation and model extrapolation Proc. R. Soc. B 269 : 991 997. (Pubitemid 34553539)
30. Korpimäki, E. et al. 2003. Vole cycles and predation Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 494 495.
31. Korpimäki, E. et al. 2005a. Vole cycles and predation in temperate and boreal zones of Europe J. Anim. Ecol. 74 : 1150 1159.
32. Korpimäki, E. et al. 2005b. Predator-induced synchrony in population oscillations of coexisting small mammal species Proc. R. Soc. B 272 : 193 202.
33. Lambin, X. 1998. Gradients in cyclicity, predation and microtine life history Res. Popul. Ecol. 40 : 137 139. (Pubitemid 128449435)
34. Lambin, X. et al. 2000. Cyclic dynamics in field vole populations and generalist predation J. Anim. Ecol. 69 : 106 118. (Pubitemid 30065228)
35. Lambin, X. et al. 2006. Vole population cycles in northern and southern Europe: is there a need for different explanations for single pattern? J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 340 349.
36. Le Louarn, H. Schmitt, A. 1973. Relations entre la production de faines et la dynamique des populations du mulot (Apodemus sylvaticus) en forêt de Fontainebleau Ann. Sci. For. 30 : 205 214.
37. Le Louarn, H. Quéré, J. P. 2003. Les rongeurs de France. Faunistique et biologie. INRA Editions.
38. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 1988. Solving the enigma of microtine cycles J. Mammal. 69 : 225 235.
39. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 1994. A spatially explicit approach to vole population processes Polish Ecol. Stud. 20 : 215 225.
40. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 1995. The landscape concept: something old, something new Lidicker, W. Z. J. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. Minnesota Press 3 19.
41. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 1999. Responses of mammals to habitat edges: a landscape perspective Landscape Ecol. 14 : 331 412.
42. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 2000. A food web/landscape interaction model for microtine rodent density cycles Oikos 91 : 435 445.
43. Lidicker, W. Z. J. 2002. From dispersal to landscapes: progress in the understanding of population dynamics Acta Theriol. 47 : 23 37.
44. Lindén, H. 1988. Latitudinal gradients in predator-prey interactions, cyclicity and synchronism in voles and small game populations in Finland Oikos 52 : 341 349. (Pubitemid 19320959)
45. May, R. 1999. Crash tests for real Nature 398 : 371 372.
46. Norrdahl, K. Korpimäki, E. 2000. The impact of predation risk from small mustelids on prey populations Mammal. Rev. 30 : 147 156. (Pubitemid 32100950)
47. Petty, S. J. et al. 1999. Diet of the tawny owl Strix aluco in relation to field vole Microtus agrestis abundance in a conifer forest in northern England J. Zool. Lond. 248 : 451 465. (Pubitemid 29365570)
48. Quéré, J. P. et al. 2000. An index method of estimating relative population densities of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) at landscape scale Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 55 : 25 32.
49. Raoul, F. et al. 2003. Echinococcus multilocularis: secondary poisoning of fox population during a vole outbreak reduces environmental contamination in a high endemicity area Int. J. Parasitol. 33 : 945 954. (Pubitemid 37297461)
50. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria .
51. Reid, D. et al. 1997. Patterns of predation on noncyclic lemmings Ecol. Monogr. 67 : 89 108.
52. Spitz, F. et al. 1974. Standardisation des piégeages en ligne pour quelques espèces de rongeurs Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 24 : 564 578.
53. Strann, K. et al. 2002. Is the heart of Fennoscandian rodent cycle still beating? A 14-year study of small mammals and tengmalm's owls in northern Norway Ecography 25 : 81 87. (Pubitemid 36154255)
54. Sundell, J. et al. 2004. Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 167 178. (Pubitemid 38106598)
55. Tkadlek, E. S. Stenseth, N. C. 2001. A new geographical gradient in vole population dynamics Proc. R. Soc. B 268 : 1547 1552. (Pubitemid 32730409)
56. Williams, C. et al. 2004. The collapse of cycles in the dynamics of North American grouse populations Ecol. Lett. 7 : 1135 1142. (Pubitemid 39588345)